had the post all the way through Rhinox, then the Internet here reset because of some stupid problem we're still having I guess.Prologue
Anyway, lost it all super pissed and super tired. Going to bed will do this Sunday maybe. Ugh.
Epilogue
had the post all the way through Rhinox, then the Internet here reset because of some stupid problem we're still having I guess.Prologue
Epilogue
Nachomamma8 wrote:Zodiark wrote:Wow, epic buddying right out of the gate.
Pulindar tried to convince you to replace out so I could replace in.
Obviously there's some history between us, and obviously there's going to be friendliness.
Is there any scum motivation? No. You painting it as such is reaching.
Zodiark wrote:Care to actually explain?
Is there a need?
Zodiark wrote:This reads like scum replacing in and, after having looked at the scum QT and seen that scum decided to push a lynch against me, jumps onto me on almost nothing.
It's highly unlikely that scum have daytalk based on Hayl's rules.
And the theory that the scumteam would plan to push your lynch pregame smells a little bit like aluminum.
Re: Changing reads: I was reading through the game. Thus, my reads changes as people acted townier/scummier.
Zodiark wrote:Nice misrep, but no. I'm pushing tans here for trying to break the game in an, if not scum then certainly anti-town way.
Break the game? How?
Zodiark wrote:Scumhunting is not all there is to the game.
For town, there is nothing else.
Zodiark wrote:In what dimension is this market you speak of? Is it the dimension where everything tans has done this game is seen as pro-town, where jesters and cults are universally liked, and where Chesskid is considered as good a poster as Vi is in this one? And if its such a strong scumtell, how come you didn't realise it when you mentioned it a few posts ago?
The second quoted bit was from my catchup, which was mostly little notes to myself.
The first quoted bit was from the case on you, which purposely used stronger language so it would be able to convince.
Are you seriously reading anything I'm posting? Twice I've pointed to my reasons for thinking that Hiraki is town, which is more than you've done for your reasons of thinking that Pul is town, and yet you still think I think Hiraki is town 'because he is'? Did RC do this bit for you?Zod wrote:Again, nice misrep, but no. I'll explain in small words, just for you. I'm not trying to buddy up with Hiraki because I don't wont to be lynched. I'm saying Hiraki is most likely town because he isn't. Also, note that by claiming I'm buddying up to my lover, you accept my lover claim, and can now call backpeddeling if you try to BS the claim. Nice one.
I'm guessing you mean Hiraki is most likely town because he is. But that still doesn't make sense because you don't give reasoning.
And I've always accepted your lover claim...?
Zod wrote:Claim means nothing. Until the flip at least. Inside knowledge that tans is a VT? Lolscum.
He claimed VT. I had a town read on him. Naturally, logic points to him being VT.
I mean, I can slow down for you if you want but this is pretty elementary.
Zod wrote:So its not rolefishing, or reaching, at all to say theres a protective role, but it is to state the obvious and say that you can't know that unless you are a backup protector?
The Rules wrote:1: Expect the Unexpected.
Things aren't always so obvious.
But, no, it isn't rolefishing because I'm not telling him/her to come on out.
No, it's not reaching because there's usually protective roles in mafia games.
It is rolefishing if you say "YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THAT UNLESS YOU ARE ROLE XXX". Because then I either claim Role xxx, or I'm scum and I get lynched. Mull about that one for a while.
Zodiark wrote:And the purpose of these posts is what again? A vote and then some BS speculation about who the scumteam is? Yeah, scratch that post about me being worried about the flip after this, we got scum here.
Oh god.
This is terrible.
Nachomamma8 wrote:Umbrage is spoutin crap again. Scum scum scum.
What happened to
YES I DON'T HAVE TO BE DROWNED SCUMUMBRAGE BULLSHIT.
YES
YES
YESSSSS
Tans is smoking some serious, serious crack. He's probably town because of it. TANS CUT THE SHIT AND GET ON ZOD. <3, Nacho.
Hiraki is town for lazy SERIOUS MODE. I like it, even if his heart's in the wrong place.
Stefunnny... Calling scum lovers? My god, that's so ridiculous it has to be coming from town.
So, a VI is town for being a VI, a lurker is town for being a lurker, and someone who puts forward a stupid idea is town for the sheer stupidity of the idea(no offence Steff). BULL FUCKING SHIT.
Zodiark wrote:On closer examination, I think I will keep my vote on tans. His 33 seems to be very reaching for a reason to have an early 'serious' bandwagon, but then happily jumps onto me for a rather flimsy reason in 49. 73 screams of scum not happy that his two bandwagons are going nowhere.
Finding reasons to keep his vote where it is. I say this because he is seriously reaching right here, and being overly vague about things by not giving real reasons.
If you mean tans, then yes, this is correct.
Zodiark wrote:EBWOP: Meant to say questions, not points. 'u scum bro?' is a suitable replacement.
Scum worried about phrasing tally: ONE
And this is a scumtell how again? More BS.
Zodiark wrote:How about no. Ignoring the fact that it was an IRC game.
And he can't link it...
Because it was an IRC GAME?
Okay. Sure. Yeah. I believe him.
I'd like to see you link an IRC game that wasn't saved. And again, how is this a scumtell?
Zodiark wrote:Theres a difference between 'friendliness' and screaming that you won't let Pul be lynched. Claiming that I'm reaching here is not only untrue, but its a terribad and desperate attempt to diffuse a case against you that you can't diffuse any other way.
Zodiark wrote:I'm asking. If this isn't enough of a reason, then that means that you have reason not to explain, and only scum would be in this position.
Zodiark wrote:I never said anything about daytalk, so more misrep. And what does the smell of metal have anything to do with the possibility of scum deciding to push a lynch on me pregame?
Zodiark wrote:A running commentary is not what we need, even more when you only post your opinions on things, not what causes those opinions, triply so when your opinions change several times in said commentary.
Zodiark wrote:
For trying to force a modkill for flimsy reasons.
Tans wrote:@Haylen - Seriously - give him his warning, boot him from game or modkill him. If you do none of these for his personal attacks on me I would request you replace me. If you give him a warning in thread like you said you would I will continue. His last post is lulzy and I would love to rip him a new one for it but I am asking you as a mod to enforce the rules you yourself set out at the start of this game.
Zodiark wrote:Ever heard of policy lynching?
Zodiark wrote:Yeah, I know where they came from, I was the one that quoted them after all. But this still doesn't answer the question.
Zodiark wrote:Are you seriously reading anything I'm posting? Twice I've pointed to my reasons for thinking that Hiraki is town, which is more than you've done for your reasons of thinking that Pul is town, and yet you still think I think Hiraki is town 'because he is'? Did RC do this bit for you?
Zodiark wrote:I'm saying Hiraki is most likely town because he isn't.
Zodiark wrote:Even town fakeclaims. Reads have nothing to do with it.
ReaperCharlie wrote: If he's scum and I'm town, then I'm STUPID and DUMB and stuff. Obviously however, this is not the case, as I am clearly ASTUTE and REASONABLE and HANDSOME... (which does not include either STUPID -OR- DUMB).
If he's town and I'm scum (trying to whiteknight or w/e Nacho said), WHAT'S THE POINT? I could have gotten an easy mislynch on Day 1 by just switching my vote. Now what I have is a bunch of people saying I'm trying to protect Zod when it's really just that he's obvtown. If I was scum, I would have hammered. Trust me.
If we are scum together and I'm protecting my scumbuddy/GF/etc, it's too OBVIOUS. Also, I'm not STUPID; see #1. There is clearly no advantage to linking us like this if we were scumbuddies. Also, there's the Hiraki thing. Unless you think the scum team is RC/Zod/Hiraki (hint, it's not), then saying Zodiark is scum CLEARLY makes no sense.
Hiraki wrote:FFS.
WHEN BOTH DEAD TOWN SUSPECT ONE PLAYER, SOMETHING IS UP.
Hiraki wrote:Rhinox has only posted at the most 6 times since the start of D2.Rhinox wrote:Dead game is dead.
Aware of a problem, but not part of the solution.
Would this person be good or evil?
Hmmzorz.
In addition, your theory makes no sense because it doesn't matter because your Tans vote was already shit.
Rhinox wrote:Hiraki wrote:FFS.
WHEN BOTH DEAD TOWN SUSPECT ONE PLAYER, SOMETHING IS UP.
This seems to be basically it.
So, what exactly is up about it? You think I lynched tans, and then killed umbrage, because both suspected me?
Rhinox wrote:As for the nk, what about my scum partners? don't they have a say? Why would we as hypo scum kill someone who suspected me as opposed to someone who suspected one of them? Does this mean everyone else who was suspected by anyone at some point in the game is more likely to be town since the players suspecting them weren't nked? Do you think it is or isn't possible I could be getting set up?
Charlie wrote:Rhinox- My argument with him didn't go to well. Null
------------
OK, so that was kinda messy. Sorry. But If we take away those truly null, this leaves behind
Nobody Special
Umbrage
Hiraki
Rhinox
Charlie wrote:Rhinox's posting seems like he's posting without actually posting. This is what stands out to me. He's null, but since you've asked about his specifically I'll say that he's slightly on the scummy side to me.
Charlie wrote:Zodiark13 & Hiraki: LikeRhinox, I've missed out on the important fact that you're claimed lovers. Apparently I didn't pay much attention to detail, I'll WORK ON THAT. In the meantime, carry on with whatever you two are doing.
Nobody Special wrote:Okay.
WTF dead game is dead.
Zodiak, Hiraki, do you two still claim to be lovers? Please answer either yes or no, each of you, and please don't elaborate further until you both have answered.(I have my reasons.)