farside22 wrote:Consp: The only situation that hurts the scum team if a cop claims if they have no RB. The only situation that occurs is the 3rd option happens. If a cop claims, the RB in the game just Rb's him.
The only concern at that point is if the scum team has no RB, but then they have a GF on their side, so the cop's chances of finding the only guilty verdict is 1 out of 8 players (take away the lynchee) 1 out of 7.
You know for the 3rd option giving the scum team a possible framer might not be a bad idea actually.
You think of it another way.
In 50% of the setups there is no RB'er. In those setups the cop benefits claiming
The other 50% consists of:
1. 25% doc - Nothing happens, the only available option that isn't helpful
2. 25% watcher - RB isn't an option. The watcher can claim since there is just 1 player that could have targeted the cop (The maf. RB)
I think either one of these options are far better than relying on the results of the cop, especially when he can get a guilty 75% of the time on just one mafia. Keep in mind that with this few players he may have just one result with 5 other players to choose from. The more valuable part of the Cop is confirmed town status, at least in my eyes.
If something is tweaked so the cop does not benefit from claiming D1 (such as the macho cop or twisted result doc) I will Nth this setup.
BTW: Non-Consecutive night protection doesn't cut it. The game will most likely just have 1 or 2 nights.
Wait, I just see this game is 9 players. Hmmz, Something in me says this game is a bit too overpowered. Might still give it I try though.