Real life is throwing a nasty curve-ball.
Juls wrote:IV.) I kept my vote on Oopid BECAUSE he hadn't encountered self votes in another game. It removes the argument that he was doing it for reaction testing (which I still don't buy). He would only have done that if he had seen that done before. Otherwise it looked like scum who didn't know that it was bad to self vote.
Who's to say that I need to have seen it done in a game that I played in, kimosabe? (Oh, for the record, someone actually
did
try the self-vote trick in one of the games I played, although it failed because someone else pulled another reaction-test gimmick right at the same time. Mini 1087.)
Wickedestjr wrote:I suspect him mostly because I don't believe that he actually selfvoted to generate reactions that he could work with. It looks like he might have stolen the reason from implosion and his posting in the first 1.5 pages didn't look like it had serious motivation behind it. Finally, he eventually expressed suspicion of Twistedspoon despite not showing any concern for his vote originally.
Well, with all due respect, if I'd made it
look
like I was self-voting to generate reactions, that would defeat the purpose of doing it in the first place.
And what good does reaction-hunting do if I leap on the first catch immediately, thus negating the reaction-provocation in the first place? You gotta be more patient than that, mon.
Morthas wrote:@Oopid: How do you from being ready to vote implosion to wagonjumping/sheeping to Kalofer?
Because I can has more than one suspect?
To respond more seriously, I jived with don's reasoning, and something felt wrong with Kal's #47 to me.
Don't really have time to look much more in-depth right now, I'm afraid.
Who you callin' oopid...(sigh) nvm.
