MagnaofIllusion wrote:I don’t think Sloth was avoiding the game due to pressure. I think he was avoiding the game because he was scum and wanted to keep a low profile after his Day 1 play. His reaction to pressure being applied for that was to replace out and continue to play actively in other games.
I don’t recall Sloth getting any grief on D1 and if he was getting any significant suspicions or criticisms for his play I think I would recall it. I do know he didn’t receive a single vote on D1 (along with zMM, Caboose and cj). So what reason did he have to stop posting? His name was not mentioned ONCE on D2 until he stopped posting in here. Here is every D2 comment I can find that casts any hint of pressure on Sloth prior to his replacing out:
Post 426 Hez - #4 - Sloth (56/100) - lurky mclurk
Post 437 Wicked - Sloth - Scum.
Post 444 Magna - In looking at ISOs Cjdrum and Sloth’s votes for Emp look the worst.
Post 452 Regfan - Umbrage, I believe Sloth is due for a prod very soon - I saw him posting elsewhere on the site but he's been avoiding this game, he stated he was 'catching up' close to three days ago. // Scum Reads: Neil113, Hezlucky, Sloth.
Post 455 zMM - Sloth needs to be more active. I don't find anything really scummy in his posts, but I haven't really seen him make or push a case on anyone, there's nothing that stands out to me as town in his posts, and his inactivity isn't helping. Null, I need to hear more from him.
Post 462 LMP - Sloth is scum.
Post 464 LMP - Vote: Sloth
Post 465 Cj - Sloth was being difficult and asking me a thousand and one questions on the top of page [number], then has disappeared to [place]. I don't get why a Townie would... Do that. At all.
VOTE: Sloth
Post 473 Magna - I’ve also reviewed Sloth’s posting history. He has 20 posts on site since the thread opened on Friday. Not a single one in this game.
Post 478 Hez – He [Wicked] has DK as town, cjdrum as scum (from the last FOS I could see this), I disagree with Magna as town and neil as scum but the other two (Sloth/MuffinMan) suspicions seem very legitimate as well. // #4 - Sloth (56/100)
Post 483 Regfan - Umbrage, Sloth hasn't posted in more than 5 days, have you sent him a prod?
Post 424 LMP - Since he's scum we should just lynch him and save the mod the trouble.
Post 486 Wicked - Not a bad idea. My scumread on cjdrum is about as strong as my scumread on Sloth and I'd be willing to switch my vote to the latter if there is enough support and cjdrum has defended against the points I bring up. (which I'm still working on)
Post 493 LMP - I agree with pretty much all of 491. I think Sloth is a better lynch though.
IMO I do not think this is anything other than normal pressure. And the majority of the comments are just referencing his absence which he could have dispelled easily by just making a few posts in here. There were NO cases made on him that he needed to lay low from. With my knowledge of his role PM the only explanation I can conceive is that he had lost interest. Which I do not see scum doing.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:You are asserting that it is because he was a bored Townie. I assert it was because he was scum and his best course of action was to get a ‘replacement halo’.
This makes no sense. What good does a “replacement halo” do for someone? Once they quit a game it’s over for them. They don’t win or lose. Who the he|| cares what happens to their player slot AFTER they have gone? If they valued their role in the game enough to try and
~save
it by replacing out…why not just stay in the game and be part of the outcome. If replacing out was such a strong scum tell people would just lynch player slots whenever they replaced out. The “pressure” you mention that forced Sloth to replace out is minimal at best and at the time he replaced out, cj was looking like a sure thing for the day’s lynch.
MagnaofIllusion wrote: Having wrote:2. No inconsistency here…I find it suspicious that you suspected DK so much Day 2 and are now focusing (or at least were when you voted me) on my slot for lesser or invalid reasons.
This is laughable. You dismiss it as not being inconsistent but don’t explain how your statement of “Suspicions change” doesn’t equally apply to myself as well as you. As for my reasons being lesser or invalid ... nah baby nah. Your slot was scummy with Sloth's avoidance of thread and your play here has been scummy.
Yeah, you are Inconsistent as Hell about this issue. Scumtastic.
Where am I being inconsistent? Summarize it and I will be more than happy to address it. As I seem to have overlooked it, can you explain your sudden change of heart on DK?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Having wrote:You took credit for a comment I had made. You said you bolded something I had bolded.
Um, whut? I don’t care if you originally bolded it or not. I bolded it
SPECIFICALLY
to draw attention to the fact that the bolded portion of your statement undercut your point completely.
You are completely straw-manning the argument by going off on some unrelated tangent about whether you originally bolded it or not. That’s irrelevant. You ignore the actual point of the argument in favor of straw-manning.
How is it strawmanning to point out the FACT that you were taking credit for bolding a comment I had bolded? I was simply pointing it out iirc. It’s a harmless point which I find your continued debate/defense of to be more suspect than the initial oversight/error.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Having wrote:Actually this is Fantasyland. Or are you really in a town that has evil sheep and werewolves?
DODGE DODGE DODGE
with another straw-man.
You can’t come up with a credible scenario why a non-Wolf claimed Seer would survive the Night so instead you post this fluff. Scummy as all get out.
Again…why are my comments a strawman example? Your just throwing out mafia buzzwords to try and discredit my comments. What am I dodging?
And as far as credible scenarios….Wicked gave one. I agreed with him which is the origin of this particular debate. I agree with the fact werewolves would be crazy/ballsy/stupid to let a claimed seer live through the night but why make D2 any easier for them by stating who would be the kill the next day? Whats wrong with agreeing with a plan/proposal/scenario that had the wolves letting the seer live and see what happened? I would have been surprised it they had let the seer live but I still thought the way Wicked rationalized a case of not committing to a next day Emp kill was reasonable. You obviously do not agree and have debated it with Wicked…but why it is scummy for me to agree with Wicked while he [wicked] appears to get a pass?
MagnaofIllusion wrote: Since my thread read of Wicked and my VC analysis both make him a very unlikely scum I’m going to place my vote with his. Especially after Having’s latest round of scumtastic replies.
VOTE: Havingfitz
I’m also open to lynching either Hez or Neil today as they are my other top Wolf suspects.
What happened to…
MagnaofIllusion wrote:One of Neil or Hez will be getting my vote when I recast it.
Some other observations while answering your attack on me…
In your [Magna] last three votes you have qualified/based/ each of your votes on the suspicions/cases made by other players.
SHEEP SHEEP SHEEP
I bolded the lines below that illustrate this anamoly (Yes…I BOLDED THEM! See how that works?).
MagnaofIllusion wrote:VOTE: Havingfitz
Now that he’s actually committed to reads in thread in his ‘catch-up’ post I feel there is information to work with.
I’ll address that monstrosity of a catch-up post later in an independent post.
For now LMP’s strong suspicion of Sloth is a great jumping off point for my vote today.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:UNVOTE: havingfitz
VOTE: Neil
That should put Neil at L-1.
After reviewing neil's ISO
I think Regs' summary of the case on Neil is pretty accurate.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Since my thread read of Wicked and my VC analysis both make him a very unlikely scum I’m going to place my vote with his.
Especially after Having’s latest round of scumtastic replies.
VOTE: Havingfitz
Also…since you [Magna] put so much stock in what others think…most recently Wicked, what do you think of the comments below made by wicked (and almost immediately agreed with by LMP)?
Wicked Post 491 wrote:His [cj’s] second post in the game (13 hours after the previous one) he states that either Empking is scum or neil and MoI are. Something extremely interesting to note: Empking flipped town, but cjdrum hasn't expressed any suspicion of neil1113 or MoI today. Moreover, he hasn't mentioned either of them or the point that he brought up earlier.
Do you [Magna] remember agreeing with Wicked? Because you did. I don’t see you debating the fact Wicked essentially linked cj to you and/or neil. I agree with this as well.
In summary...Magna is scum. It would help to get a flip on a wolf and see where that leads us. I still think DK makes sense as a wolf. As for Magna, I am not convinced he is a wolf which is the only reason I do not vote him. Though his backing off of my main wolf read does tie them together in my mind. If I don’t get sidelined by another Magna wall I will refine/clarify my DK read.
Does anyone find the fact there were two players who made an appearance on the 6 person wagon on Emp and the 7 person lynch of Twisted? Those two players were Magna and DK yet they both have alluded suspicion for it. I would be amazed if one or both of them was not scum.