WrathChild
PeregrineV
LMP
Baby Spice wrote:SGR:
Wine arguements, self-meta arguements.
I got no idea what to make of him yet.
Dry-fit wrote:Would really like to hear more from SnakePlissken, not liking his contribution so far.
Feysal wrote:Something that caught my eye as I was reading was how abruptly Zdenek changed his read when Pine claimed. Even as Pine was pushing his own lynch Zdenek believed he was scum, and suddenly changed when Pine claimed. Why is that?
inHimshallibe wrote:fos: gandalf
inHimshallibe wrote:Also
fos: katy, zdenek, feysal
LynchMePls wrote:Ya for FOS count.
FOS: Katy
Read her ISO last night and was infinitely less than impressed. I would recommend it as good reading for anyone else who might want to find scum.
WrathChild wrote:Why is RBT confirmed town. Is an alignment shift not a possibility?
Talking about mislynches of people other than yourself or those you know are not scum before the fact just seems to smack of too much information.Katy wrote:I said he was obv. scum because he kept saying he was Merlin (a wizard). In other words, a joke.
Even if I thought he was scummy (and I'm not sure on that right now) I would have unvoted because he had racked up seven votes in a short amount of time and in the previous Sorcerers/Wizards game the exact same thing happened leading to a quick mislynch, so I was being cautious and unvoting. Plus, Implosion was and still is coming off as more scummy than SGR. I don't understand why he cares so much about the who the hydra is. How are their identities relevant to their alignment?
inHimshallibe wrote:Turning this back to you - give me your take on gandalf and Zdenek.
Zdenek wrote:Baby Spice wrote:
Zdenek however, is making softly softly attacks on easy targets, which to me points at scum trying to not get too invested in a mis-lynch.
Beefster/Amrun for example. Vote on lurker Snake for no real reason is bad. Weak reasons on Pine when there were good reasons for voting him.
What makes you think that Amrun is an easier target than Beefster?
What were the good reasons for voting Pine?
I still think that SnakePl is scum. He's posted little and in the post he made before I voted him there was a lot of pro-town fluff, and his current vote is (ironically) on a lurker. He also asks questions that he wouldn't need to if he was reading the thread. If he wasn't on the suggested list of vigging targets, my vote would still be there.
Zdenek wrote:Baby Spice wrote:
Zdenek however, is making softly softly attacks on easy targets, which to me points at scum trying to not get too invested in a mis-lynch.
Beefster/Amrun for example.
Zdenek wrote:
I attacked Amrun out of that pair.
Baby Spice wrote:
So that would be you calling Amrun an easier target than Beefster, not me.
No, it's not. I never thought that I was attacking weak targets. So that is pure B.S.
Baby Spice wrote:
It's not that he was alarmist per se, but that he built up from a reasonable thing to an alarmist thing.
That he escalated his rhetoric with nothing from Icey that would have supported such an escalation.
Your reasoning here is garbage because you are trying to argue that Soben didn't build up from a reasonable statement to an alarmist one, which is patently false.
WC wrote:
He went from: "Derp! Yeah! I don't have to read and can be lazy! Yeah! Screw actually reading anything carefully!" to a very in depth poster who has detailed theories and reads on different people. This was just over the course of about 4 RL days. It is a huge posting style flip and it bugs me. If we aren't going to lynch him, fine, but I don't like what I'm getting from him.
This is one of the worst reasons I have ever seen someone use to try to push a wagon (for the record, I have seen this argument used by scum in the past). Player plays badly, comes under pressure for it, improves, and scum not wanting to abandon their original case, uses this stupid reason to keep pushing their lynch.
Why does anyone have a town read on WC again?
inHimshallibe wrote:Talking about mislynches of people other than yourself or those you know are not scum before the fact just seems to smack of too much information.
Later on in the Day, I didn't push the issue further, but feel it may be worth it now.
Katy wrote:I wasn't that active yesterday for several reasons, including that a lot was going on in another game I'm involved in and that work all of the sudden got sucky and I've been unexpectedly stressed, making it hard for me to come in and focus really hard on playing.
If it helps, I can tell you that I checked out the masons and I don't believe there is any gambit going on there. As to anything else I have to say, I want to check something with the mod first.
@Inhim: Can you elaborate on this "slip" about mislynches?
IceyCupcake wrote:@SGRaize:You have an interesting set of reads on a narrow subset of players. It's starting to disturb me.
What do you see your position in this town as? Are you a leader? A rabble rouser? Do you force people who are lurking to post? Shine the light in dark corners? Analyze people's posts and determine what alignment they are? What are you doing today?
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:sgraiize's spamming is weird and could be overcompensating for nervousness.