DEFCON Mafia 3.0 - Over, American Victory!

[Internet Stranger]

Wasn't Mina filthy communist scum and Fate's lover last time?

[Lady Lambdadelta]

I'm of the opinion that at least one of the people jockeying for the ability to lead town is scum.

Yeah? Which one? Care to be a bit less general? This is about as useful as "thar's scum on that thar wagon"

@Mina:

How likely did you think it was that you could come up with a breaking plan for the powers? You had experience with DEFCON 2, but the tone I'm getting from your posts in #241 and #253 is that you put some significant time into it. True/false?

Yes Magua, I can totally tell which one it is before we hit DEFCON 3.

Because, you know, they've totally had the chance to show the true intent behind their wanting to lead the charge for town, right?

I will keep you updated as I continue to pursue this angle, but I can't determine which is scum and which is town just yet.

But I do feel there is one scum at least in IS/Pooky/SDC;.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

I don't read people

I nuke people

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

I'm of the opinion that at least one of the people jockeying for the ability to lead town is scum.

Yeah? Which one? Care to be a bit less general? This is about as useful as "thar's scum on that thar wagon"

@Mina:

How likely did you think it was that you could come up with a breaking plan for the powers? You had experience with DEFCON 2, but the tone I'm getting from your posts in #241 and #253 is that you put some significant time into it. True/false?

Yes Magua, I can totally tell which one it is before we hit DEFCON 3.

Because, you know, they've totally had the chance to show the true intent behind their wanting to lead the charge for town, right?

I will keep you updated as I continue to pursue this angle, but I can't determine which is scum and which is town just yet.

But I do feel there is one scum at least in IS/Pooky/SDC;.

Are you proposing to kill us all and hopefully hit a scumbag?

[Lady Lambdadelta]

No. There's no need for that kind of elimination of strong town leader(s).

You aren't ALL scum.

I'm going to trust myself to be able to tell which of you is insincere and scum.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

you don't have to worry about me or IS both of us can't wait to press the fire button on our ICBMs and when we launch, we will likely be launched in retal by the scumbags that we launch at. So we will die in the line of combat protecting your coward euro-trash sympathizers that like to practice your french and drink coffee out of little porcelains cups. But this is America, we don't drink ESPRESSO out of tiny miniature cups that look like they belong in a little girl's tea set. We drink hot american coffee loaded with an unhealthy amount of sugar and milk from giant paper cups while shooting our way through terrorist encampments in protection of your espresso sipping snobs.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

I'm pretty sure the scum are all hiding with the white flag waving sympathizer crowds that are too scared to let the nukes fly.

I am sure they will murder me in the night so that I do not nuke them.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

you don't have to worry about me or IS both of us can't wait to press the fire button on our ICBMs and when we launch, we will likely be launched in retal by the scumbags that we launch at. So we will die in the line of combat protecting your coward euro-trash sympathizers that like to practice your french and drink coffee out of little porcelains cups. But this is America, we don't drink ESPRESSO out of tiny miniature cups that look like they belong in a little girl's tea set. We drink hot american coffee loaded with an unhealthy amount of sugar and milk from giant paper cups while shooting our way through terrorist encampments in protection of your espresso sipping snobs.

When I see it, I'll know you're town, won't I?

Which is what I've been trying to say.

We're saying the same thing, really. You're just saying it in a cooler way >.<

I'm pretty sure the scum are all hiding with

the white flag waving

sympathizer crowds that are too scared to let the nukes fly.

I am sure they will murder me in the night so that I do not nuke them.

PFFT :3 Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys~

[ooba]

"Pooky, I am a true American hero and am willing to pledge my nuclear weapons to the destruction of Euro Scum and their Traitor Sympathizer Brethren, You can tell that I am a true American hero because I wanted to let the nukes fly"

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

That's not convincing enough ooba. I'm going to need a least a paragraph describing your hatred of the coward euro-scumbags who want to eat danishes and yodel in the mountains.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

you don't have to worry about me or IS both of us can't wait to press the fire button on our ICBMs and when we launch, we will likely be launched in retal by the scumbags that we launch at. So we will die in the line of combat protecting your coward euro-trash sympathizers that like to practice your french and drink coffee out of little porcelains cups. But this is America, we don't drink ESPRESSO out of tiny miniature cups that look like they belong in a little girl's tea set. We drink hot american coffee loaded with an unhealthy amount of sugar and milk from giant paper cups while shooting our way through terrorist encampments in protection of your espresso sipping snobs.

When I see it, I'll know you're town, won't I?

Which is what I've been trying to say.

We're saying the same thing, really. You're just saying it in a cooler way >.<

I'm pretty sure the scum are all hiding with

the white flag waving

sympathizer crowds that are too scared to let the nukes fly.

I am sure they will murder me in the night so that I do not nuke them.

PFFT :3 Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys~

oh really? ok i guess you could be the hot babe in my team of true american superheroes. I'm gonna need a scantily clad pic to see if you need a boob job though.

[Screaming Death Clan]

stop being cheeky you know damn well what we meant

That was my answer. It's like saying "Faraday you'll be my #1 Townie if you record yourself singing 'Teenage Dream'".

...wait, that would actually work. Bad example. But you get the idea.

Except that he JUST confirmed he was serious

[Screaming Death Clan]

Welp this page proves LLD can continue to be ignored and treated with many lulz

Vi's ignoring of RedCoyote's play and dismissal as "lol troll" makes Vi a likely RCbuddy

[danakillsu]

Well, considering we've got both Pooky and IS doing their hippity-hop, gung-ho, BS, and we've got another player who's blatantly anti-town, I tend to think town is screwed if none of them is maf. I'm definitely ready to start voting...

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

Your post drips of stinking Euro-scum fear

[Magua]

And who are you waiting to vote for, dana?

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

he's too busy looking for a fallout shelter to vote for someone

[Magister Ludi]

Redcoyote

1. "Still, this is assuming lurkers would be taken out by those with nukes. A fair assumption, but an assumption nonetheless."

No. Because town has nukes, and ability to shoot them, scum dont want to lurk, and be a target.

2. "Wow. No. No freaking way. Lists aren't made public, so there's about a 0% chance of scum following through on whatever orders you give them.

Either you just made a naive comment or you're scummy for this, and you don't strike me as the naive type. "

Um, no. What I was inquiring at around the beginning of defcon 4 was if we publicly (in thread) allocated 4 players to each role. It was said somewhere that the more people picking each role, less likely scum were to get it. Obviously scum could deviate, but it would be detrimental to them. How is this statement in any way shape or form scummy?

3.

ML 338 wrote:
All these town----->scum lists floating around now need to dissipate. I don't need a laundry list of every player in the game (who everyone also happens to be reading), what people need is pointed attacks on those doing scummy things.

"So you don't want to know what people are thinking? Maybe you won't have to if we go ahead and lynch you first, eh? I like how you say this and turn around and say..."

This is a complete misrepresentation. I could easily apply your above 'naive statement' to you. Laundry list is a random list of town to scum. I never said that I didn't want to know what people are thinking, infact, I asked for pointed statements from people on their biggest scum reads. And where and why in god's name does this go to lynching? Can you explain the chain of logic

ML 344 wrote:
Toasty, would you mind giving me a read (or even sentence or two) on the following players

"Get out of here with this."

What part of pointed reads on those players I consider scum from someone else whose alignment I am trying to figure out is scummy at all? You are majorly grasping at straws here. Trying to get mutual reads from other players is very protown.

Red, I'm not sure what you were using for your logic, but it is pretty wrong and illogical. Your good/great/etc lynch list I don't agree with much at all.

[Magister Ludi]

I am going to be nuking (should I have a nuke) the player with the lowest post count as soon as we get to DEFCON 1. Don't be that player.

[Magister Ludi]

Holy shit Pooky and Internet Stranger are hilarious. I like their style.

[AlmasterGM]

[NORAD SYSTEM] Dispatching assignments, standby...

[AlmasterGM]

[Day 1, DEFCON 3]

[NORAD SYSTEM] ALERT. ALERT. Enemy movement detected.
[NORAD SYSTEM] Analyzing...
[NORAD SYSTEM] Threat is within striking distance of priority targets.
[NORAD SYSTEM] Forwarding...
[NORAD SYSTEM] Parsing possible response scenarios...

---

"General, we've got additional intel."
"What is it, solider?"
"The enemy missile cruisers appear to be escorting European submarines."
"WHAT?!"
"Yes, sir. Moreover, they have continued their current course. They are about to enter the Canadian Exclusive Economic Zone..."
"...insanity, pure insanity..."
"...our projections indicate that if any of the craft were loaded with nuclear armants, they would be capable of striking major US cities in under 5 minutes. Specifically, a payload could be delivered to Washington, D.C. in approximately 3 minutes and 25 seconds."
"...they must be dealt with."
"Yes, sir."
"Get me the president."
"Right away, General."
...
"Please hold for the President of the United States."
...
"General? What is it? And before you answer, it better be a damn national emergency, not another one of your conspiracy theories."
"Sir, we have a serious threat on our hands."
"Go ahead."
"European submarines and missile cruisers are just outside Canadian waters. Their travel path does not correspond with any known route in our systems ... sir, these craft could be carrying nuclear weapons. If they are, they represent a grave threat to our saftey."
"Missile cruisers? Are you absolutely certain?"
"Yes, sir. The briefing should be coming your way in just a second..."
"Good god, George...what is this madness? There has to be a reasonable explanation."
"Mr President, forgive me for being blunt - but I cannot think of one."
"Oh come on, if they wanted to attack America they would send more than a couple of boats."
"...That may be true, Sir. But we must be cautious. I suggest you telephone the President of the EU. In the meantime, however, I am reccomending you lower the national DEFCON level to 3 and permit me to make preparations for an emergency response."
"Fine. To Both. But I want a conventional response, General. Subject to my approval."
"But sir, if those cruisers are carrying nuclea..."
"This nation does not want to see another nuclear war, George. We have one of the greatest military forces in the world - we should be able to respond to a threat in a calm, rational manner."
"But..."
"You heard me. No doomsday. Conventional response. I'll be expecting a briefing in 30 minutes."
"Yes, Mr President."

It is now Day 1, DEFCON 3. The deadline is Monday, 27 June at 23:59 EST.

[Magua]

HEY FATE

In unrelated news:
VOTE: AurorusVox

[Hinduragi]

Vote: Dana

We've already got the first scum.

Magua needs to be nuked at Defcon 1.

[ToastyToast]

Vote:IS