Captain Corporal wrote:I totally feel like hammering.
I'm kind of cautious about this vig-claim of Toro's. Couldn't he be a SK or something?
One-Shot
Captain Corporal wrote:
Is Elfen being replaced or something? I have no idea what happened there
xvart wrote:Hoppster, 278 wrote:And now using pointbtogether with pointc, we can logically conclude that if Empking is not a Miller, he must be scum.
How? Well, if he's not a Miller, that means he's not being truthful. But we know that townies are truthful. Therefore he is not a townie. Therefore he is scum.
That was easy, wasn't it?
You really needed a spoilered wall post with logical truth table analysis to provide us with this? When exactly start believing that Toro was scum? From my perspective you and him have been dancing around each other all day with respect to your reads on each other.
Empking, to Toro wrote:Vig yourself tonight.
Empking, to Toro wrote:Actually, take out a lurker of your choice.
Sundy wrote:Elfen, do you think Toro is the best lynch given that 1) he might just be a PR, 2) if he's Mafia then he can't produce 2 kills, and 3) if he's not town-aligned he'll still want to appear so by striking out in an anti-town direction??
Twistedspoon wrote:4. Deadlines and Activity
i) You will be automatically replaced if you receive 3 prods, or 2 prods in the same game day.
SleepyKrew wrote:Elf being an idiot is a null-tell. Though Panzer, he does seem a bit more VIish than last game, doesn't he?
Anyway, Sundy, you're forgetting that Toto may be scum and that we have a SK as well.
The fact that Elf didn't know the Town Win-Con is highly scummy. I wouldn't put it past him not to entirely read the Role PM though.
So are we sparing Toto?
Hoppster wrote:
@ Mod: If there were any Mafia PRs in this game, would they be able to carry out both the NK and their own action?
Also, if there were any SKs in this game, would they have a compulsive night-kill?
Twistedspoon wrote:4. Deadlines and Activity
i) You will be automatically replaced if you receive 3 prods, or 2 prods in the same game day.
^ Is this rule still in effect? Because if so, 1joe60 needs replacing.
Empking wrote:Its not the case that lurkers can be replaced. Flakes can be replaced but not lurkers.
Hoppster wrote:Empking wrote:Its not the case that lurkers can be replaced. Flakes can be replaced but not lurkers.
I'm fine with a lurker vig provided we tie down Toro to a specific shot.
What are your thoughts on SleepyKrew?
Thomith wrote:
@Modif we dont use time before the deadline is it rolled over to the next day or just forgotten about?
Thomith wrote:woah i dont think we should have a L-1 at this stage in the game UNVOTE: for now because i really dont want a hammer on someone untill there is a massivly solid case on them.
@Modif we dont use time before the deadline is it rolled over to the next day or just forgotten about?
SleepyKrew wrote:Elf being an idiot is a null-tell. Though Panzer, he does seem a bit more VIish than last game, doesn't he?
Anyway, Sundy, you're forgetting that Toto may be scumand that we have a SK as well.
The fact that Elf didn't know the Town Win-Con is highly scummy. I wouldn't put it past him not to entirely read the Role PM though.
So are we sparing Toto?
Hoppster wrote:@ Mod: If there were any Mafia PRs in this game, would they be able to carry out both the NK and their own action?
Sundy wrote:You call the case on you massively solid, Toro? :/
Hoppster wrote:@ Mod: If there were any Mafia PRs in this game, would they be able to carry out both the NK and their own action?
Good point I forgot about Mafia-aligned vig.
Well if the chances of harm being done by 2 kills outweigh the advantage of giving Toro the benefit of the doubt and letting him try and hit scum, then I'll put my vote on Toro. Especially if he considers the case on him solid.