Newbie 1116 -- Game Over

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #550 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 3:59 pm

mabey workdawg he has ahint of scumyness

Grimmjow · Post Post #551 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:00 pm

Not everyone is night owls like we are, buddy. And after having posted today, and the last time he was online was like 1:00 pm our time, then that's not considered lurking. Lurking means that they are online, reading the thread, and not posting at all.

Grimmjow · Post Post #552 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:00 pm

bluepokemon1234 wrote:mabey workdawg he has ahint of scumyness

Ok. This is better. Why do you think he has "a hint of scummyness"?

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #553 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:07 pm

hjust a little but it seams like hes trying to add preasure he even said so somewere that dosnt sound town to me but idk

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #554 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:07 pm

edwop -h

Grimmjow · Post Post #555 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:17 pm

Adding pressure has the potential to make scum slip up, so adding pressure is not a bad thing either.

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #556 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:20 pm

well i he my next is cy for bieng a half lurker and not helping

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #557 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:20 pm

lol mega edwop let me fix that one se

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #558 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:21 pm

my next best guess is cy for bieng a half way lurker and not helping town.

kk that what i meant to say

Grimmjow · Post Post #559 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:53 pm

I'm going to put pressure on Al now, and take a leap here, but:

Vote: bigAl

bigAl wrote:Okay, because people keep adding new posts in the thread since I started writing this, I'm going to cut it off here and start a new post. Cause I realize that in this long post, I've said incredibly little about anything specific.

You have not done this. And you have been online multiple times since you posted this, so I'm calling you out for lurking.
Plus, your vote is staying on cy for no real good reason.

bigAl wrote:UNVOTE: Grimmjow, VOTE: Cymru for not contributing any suspicions for pages and pages, and then finally contributing illogical ones.

Contributing illogical suspicions is not necessarily a scum thing, especially considering how he has been playing. However, being an IC and voting someone based on really loose/faulty logic does seem like a scummy thing to do.

bigAl wrote:Anyway. A cymru lynch makes me... nervous. And yes, I know I'm voting him at the moment. My thoughts- if he flips town, what does that give us? We know that he didn't like JJ for questionable reasons. We know that most everyone that has talked about him wants him to post more definite opinions on people. The only thing that could really distinguish the remaining live people from each other is whether or not they thought his "typo" was legitimate or not. And his role doesn't really even matter much for that - if someone thinks it's a typo, they still think it's a typo whether he's scum or not. There's also the consideration of whether he's currently helping the town (as either scum or town) - currently not much. I guess it makes sense to - when you see several people as equally scummy - lynch the one that's the least helpful to the town. Of course this is all a big if he flips town. If he's scum, that's great, but doesn't give a lot of info about his partner.

Then why keep your vote on cy at all? If his lynch gives us NO information whatsoever, then why are you still keeping your vote there and, in essence, pushing for his lynch.

I'm putting myself out here with this vote, and I want to hear from others as to their opinions of Al.

Fixed quote tag. ~~NS

bigAl · Post Post #560 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:06 pm

Grimmjow wrote:You have not done this. And you have been online multiple times since you posted this, so I'm calling you out for lurking.

Dude, it's been two hours. I'm working on it! Give me a chance here. Lurking is not not posting for two hours.

Grimmjow · Post Post #561 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:08 pm

I had a feeling that would catch your attention.

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #562 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:10 pm

cy gets a fos

bigAl · Post Post #563 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:10 pm

Also, I have posted at least twice since then, so you can't even call that lurking - I have been contributing to the conversation at hand.

Also, I explained why I'm still voting him in #524.

Pre-post-edit: It would catch my attention?

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #564 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:13 pm

so the chatfest tonight is me grim and al it seams three pepole that i think are town this will get us nowere

Grimmjow · Post Post #565 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:17 pm

It takes 2 hours to formulate a post? I hardly see that. And anyone that is lurking would see when they were called out, and would jump on the defensive for it. Thus, why I thought it would catch your attention. And yes, I do understand that you say you're still voting him because of his lack of content and the fact that he has ignored questions/accusations pointed at him, but that very well could just be a noob thing, and not vote worthy this early in the game, IMO. As far as your "posting twice" goes, you've only posted once. Five minutes after you last post to chime in that you're vote was still there. And then nothing for 2 hours. Especially when I had mentioned a potential speed mafia deal tonight. So yeah, I can kinda call that lurking.

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #566 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:21 pm

im debating wheater or not to vote cy

bigAl · Post Post #567 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:47 pm

> Then why keep your vote on cy at all? If his lynch gives us NO information whatsoever, then why are you still keeping your vote there and, in essence, pushing for his lynch.
I never said it would give NO information whatsoever. Obviously, a lynch will confirm at least one person - the person who was lynched. There's things that can be learned from it. I'm not pushing for his lynch, I'm pressuring for him to contribute. I also said that I'd rather him lynched than some other players, so that's better than nothing.

> As far as your "posting twice" goes, you've only posted once.
Three times, actually: #524, #526, #534

> It takes 2 hours to formulate a post?
Yes, it does, when your employee calls in sick for tomorrow and you have to spend an hour rejuggling the work schedule, and you have laundry to do and other stuff is going on. Forgive me for tabbing over to the game every half hour to take a two minute break from work to see if anyone posted. And then taking an hour to read the thread and make notes.

> Especially when I had mentioned a potential speed mafia deal tonight.
Especially when I said I couldn't do any speed mafia tonight (in #534). This is a forum game - if you want speed mafia, join the AIM chat. You can play half a dozen games a night there.

I don't see your case against me holding much water if you're trying to convince the others that I was lurking on purpose.

/this is grumpy, tired Al signing off for the night. I'll try for more analysis tomorrow. (I never promised more posts within a particular timeframe. I know the deadline is coming up soon but sometimes life happens. I'm doing what I can.) Sigh.

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #568 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:03 pm

wait it takes 3 weaks for one lycnch?

VisceraEyes · Post Post #569 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:25 pm

Wowie. Luckily Al's was the only post that was a challenge to read. Doing ISO of Workdawg now, bbiaf

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #570 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:28 pm

yay someones online

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #571 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:28 pm

ive deieced VOTE: cy

cymru96 · Post Post #572 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:08 pm

fos Blue

He unvotes as soon as there's suspicion on him and the two of us are getting the most attention and he then votes for me maybe to take pressure off him.

bluepokemon1234 · Post Post #573 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:39 pm

i voted you beacuse your a lurker

VisceraEyes · Post Post #574 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:14 pm

ISO of Workdawg reveals that his most substantial posts are defending himself against Tomie. Interesting to note: Tomie is pretty much soft-attacking Workdawg's ARGUMENT, but he responds to it as if it were an all-out accusation complete with vote. Granted, her questions were leading, and she was painting his actions scummy...but she never really said she thought he was scum, and his defense is greater than any other post he's made, with the possible exception for the post where he voted me.