UNVOTE: Gorilla
Claimed Eavesdrop is going to be dead soon if Town. No reason at all to consider hanging Gorilla today without a counter-claim.
I notice Sociopath has gone back to lurking since the small semblance of pressure on him has disappeared. Scumtastic!
@ooba
– You contribution to the thread is not what I would expect from Town-Ooba who is NK immune. What reason do you have to not be strongly scum-hunting as the Airbase?
--
AV wrote:@MoI: This is a clanger worth voting for, and keep your eyes out for the bussers hopping on soon. His previous "clanger" wasn't a scumslip, because it was just bizarre from scum or town. This, however, is a bonafide liar-liar-pants-on-fire scumslip.
Um you keep calling me Euro scum. Why would you suggest I keep an eye out for bussers if I’m scum?
AV wrote: So you thought he was scummy for it but you didn't want to "let on" that you thought that?
No it should have been clear from your and my interaction that I think rushing the day before everyone posts is scummy. No mystery there. Asking him to answer the question, as I explained, was to see if his response (or lack thereof) would augument my opinion of his scumminess.
AV wrote:No. I'm saying. Didn't HIS desire to "finish what we started yesterday" (posted in his first post today) tell you that HEZ wanted to RUSH today's day through? It has nothing to do with me feeling rushed. It has everything to do with how you didn't pick up on HEZ's attitude of rushing.
You are 100% missing the point. I’m going to solidfy it into a series of statements that as clearly as possible explain my issue with the posting.
1. Hez posts his “let’s rush the Day” comment.
2. 7 minutes later respond saying “MoI why don’t you find Hez scummy for that ” and asserted I was being inconsistent.
You posted an asseted conclusion about what I thought EVEN BEFORE I RESPONDED. You had no clue when you responded what I thought. You can’t have … I hadn’t posted yet. But you plowed away in manner that doesn’t jibe with a Town mindset.
AV wrote:I don't know which post you think is AtE?
Post 926.
--
LLD wrote:MoI, why are you discrediting his playstyle, when he is clearly providing reads and potentially doing more?
He does a LOT more than people like CES/Jack?
I disagree wholeheartedly with the bolded statement. His play to this point has been characterized by a highly affected “AMERUKA” posting style and lack of any reasoning when he’s providing his reads.
As to why I made the statement I did – it was specifically crafted rhetoric made to see if he would break his highly affected style.
--
Hez wrote:Can you please link me to a game where you've been right about anything?
I'm completely serious.
That you can ask for this after your complete Pants on Head performance in Jungle Republic …
--
Pooky wrote:At no point does Dana say that AV is not scum. The CLOSEST he ever gets to saying AV is not scum is when he says in his 15th Post that he DOES NOT HAVE A SCUMREAD ON AV. This is in NO WAY SAYING AV IS NOT SCUM.
Dana’s ISO 12 (where he responds that LL, Gamma, SpyreX, and AV are blatantly Pro-Town) begs to differ with you.
Pooky wrote:The point that I made as regards to Dana is that he is not committing to AV either way, he won't say if he thinks AV is scum or not scum and I questioned whether he was trying to protect his buddy by pushing another wagon.
And the point I made is that it’s pretty absurdly stupid to assume that Dana scum would strongly press a counter-wagon to AV (who was under heavy fire both Days) scum partner.
Dana-scum may be hoping to score Town cred by saying “hey, I told you Hez was a good wagon and not to hang AV” if AV flips Town.
Dana-Town could also honestly believe that AV isn’t scum and is pushing someone he thinks really is scum.
Both those are scenarios that make more sense then the one you described.
The rest of your post is basically ranting. Congrats on continuing the lack of coherent posting!
--
Magua wrote:Gorilla is either getting massively railroaded as town, or massively bussed as scum. Regardless, there are scum in the people who are voting him: Lady Lambdadelta, Toogeloo, Magister Ludi, Regfan, MagnaofIllusion
In this post Magua sets up a dichotomy wherein regardless of Gorilla’s alignment the people on his wagon MUST be scum.
Scumtastic of you Magua.
Magua wrote:It's more the assumption that gorilla has Eavesdrop. If gorilla has eavesdrop, and he's scum, lynching him does nothing for us today.
Although I agree that lynching an uncounterclaimed Eavesdrop is suboptimal stating that lynching a scum player would do nothing for us (since he would be, you know, dead scum) is pretty out there.
--
Revenge wrote:You're seriously suggesting Pooky is trying to play like a model Townie?
Actually I’m seriously suggesting he’s playing in a useless, rhetoric filled way.
Revenge wrote:Yes, they're scum; no, they're not getting lynched.
Weren’t you the slot that said my stance on Socio (that he was scum but wasn’t going to be lynched for reasons stated) was scummy?
Yep, that’s you. Yet here you do the EXACT same thing.
Ok, not the exact. You don’t even give any reasons why.
You definiately need to glow or hang pretty soon.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.