you're not interested and still making arguments using it as a base?subgenius wrote:
Acro wrote:ok, where?
Really?
Post 229
Subgenius wrote:Regardless, I'm not all that interested in whether or not Sleepy had a valid reason for calling Acro a VI. I'm interested in why he felt it was necessary to excuse Arco's refusal to vote in the first place.
it's irrevalant but you're still weaving arguments around it?subgenius wrote:
Post 235
Subgenius wrote:I didn't read the link, because it's irrelevant to my suspicions of him or you. I don't care why SK thinks you're a VI. I care why he went out of his way to defend you, and I care why you seem to be going out of your way to return the favor.
and a big part of the mutual defense is the VI thing. why ignore it?subgenius wrote:
Post 237
Subgenius wrote:I'm really not interested in whether he is or isn't a VI. Judging purely on this game, I'd say he's not, but it's irrelevant. The important thing is the mutual defense between Acro and SK, which I still find quite suspicious.
your question is why he called me a VI. i told you and you ignored it. if you ask a question that has to do with the VI thing and then say the V thing is irrevelant, it just doesn't work.subgenius wrote:
Post 330
Subgenius wrote:The case would be the same whether he excused your non votes based on a meta history non-voting, or a defense of non-voting in general (which he did), or attacked the one who was trying to pressure you based on non-voting (which he did). The VI issue is irrelevant to the reason anybody finds SK scummy.
ok, now you're just being a dicksubgenius wrote:
FYI, you could have found all but one of these explanations by searching my ISO for "irrelevant"
Dictionary.com wrote:
irrelevant (ɪˈrɛləvənt)
— adj
not relating or pertinent to the matter at hand; not important
how do you know? you've never even read the previous game.subgenius wrote:
That is what your behavior in the previous game with SK is to my case against SK in this game. Irrelevant.
subgenius wrote:
As I've said multiple times. It doesn't matter to me the least bit why SK thinks you're a VI and whether he is right or wrong in his assessment. It matters why he felt compelled to lessen the pressure on you. Your behavior in a previous game does not matter to my case at all, therefor I have not spent any of my limited time reading that previous game.
he called me VI to lessen the pressure on me
he lessened the pressure on me by calling me VI
so why do you just assume it's irrelevant? and i'd like an answer that isn't "i don't care" or anything similar to that.
sorry for anyone who has questions ect. for me. i'll try to get around to them, but this post was just annoying me too much for me not to dissect it.
pedit:
this is actually sounding like a good idea. i think i might do that too if i find the time.SleepyKrew wrote:I'm going to do a full reread.