I think we can do better than jahudo vs. WLC, but it goes without saying (and I'm going to say it anyway) that I'd compromise on a WLC lynch to save someone who I know is town, even though WLC has been more lurkish and underwhelming than scummy.
WeyounsLastClone wrote:abstaining to vote for quite some time
Are you arguing that this is similar to "not tying oneself to a vote"? Because I got flack for not random voting before I got flack for not serious voting. I knew it was going against the grain, and that it would put me under the spotlight. So I'm not sure you could accurately argue I was trying to avoid the spotlight.
But on the other aspect of voting, where you define your position and that makes it harder for you to change it, I argue I was able to do that without voting. I would say I didn't like wagons and wouldn't join them. That is limiting myself, something scum don't want to do.
WeyounsLastClone wrote:his posts feel a lot more 'controlled' than inhim's. Inhim has a bit of the chaos I feel that's associated with a townie who doesn't exactly know what, whereas Jahudo's post feel more decided yet uncommitting (building in safeguards).
How am I uncommitted to my inHim suspicions? I only was in instances where I felt clarifications would be helpful in confirming or disproving my ideas about him. That is my way of showing I don't know exactly what is happening, and how I am trying to figure things out.
When you talk about chaos I think of vague statements and the lack of communication inHim had with WLC while voting him. That might be a sign of uncertainty among some playstyles, but it's harder to accept this player is trying to figure things out.
