Review of AGar ISO and Chesskid ISO for elements related to known scum flips
--
AGar ISO
(I didn’t bother to include Nacho as all the known Egyptians were dead by the time he replaced in) –
AGar at 222 wrote:CMAR had a lot of cognitive dissonance in his posting about SD, which was the main backing for my vote, but Dekes highlights a decent few points in 221.
Follows along with Dekes regarding diddin being scummy.
AGar at 277 wrote:Quadz brings up good points on Dekes, but I'm not going to run headlong into that one atm, one at a time.
Very soft agreement that scum-Dekes is scummy but shelves it.
AGar at 330 wrote:Dekes' 235 is right on the money. I haven't been able to get any read on AV due to him being nearly invisible in the thread, & RoN is acting in a similar manner to Axelrod.
More agreement with Dekes. Leaves the door open on AV due to inactivity.
AGar at 523 wrote:TL;DR: "So I'm gonna call two people scum, and I'm gonna connect them. But I'm also gonna qualify both of them as individually scum so that way when one flips town, the other will still get lynched."
1. An attack on the mothrax/ConSpiracy slot for lining up lynches. Doesn’t vote for said player but simply unvotes. Note that the vote on Mothrax does appeaer after AGar is poked by Dekes.
2. Potential distancing from either Town wagon Day 1.
AGar at 728 wrote:AV gets scumpoints for twisting people's comments in order to get his Dekes wagon.
More soft attacks on known scum (AV) without followup pressure or a vote.
AGar at 1039 wrote:Leaning scum on AGM, mainly because Andrius doesn't seem like the kind of person that would be like "Hmm, insane dude investigating someone... LOL THIS NAME." Insane flavor cop is really.. really borderline sketch of an attempt here.
This I don’t like from the standpoint that it was ‘outguessing the mod’ and throwing cold water on the concept of an insane flavor cop.
AGar at 1046 wrote:Uhhhhh no?
No player stepping up to claim blocking SD != SD-scum.
Again, it would be BORDERLINE BASTARD MODDING for SD to be anti-town of any kind.
Before even reading quadz, Dekes jumps up to Lynch2
Lynch2: Dekes
Hops on Dekes for bad attack on Shadow.
AGar at 1136 wrote:AGM still needs to die. With AV.
Why are we still sitting here?
AGar at 1161 wrote:Because it's not an "official" vote, so I haven't been paying as much attention to it as I have just actions. I find Dekes and AGM both fairly scummy, but either or would do well. AGM is just sitting there being a jackass, so I'm more wishful for him to hang currently.
These back to back posts make me think his Dekes Lynch 2 vote might have been distancing. He hopped on for a single post and subsequently kept pushing other suspects as scum.
AGar at 1386 wrote:Mothrax has done nothing but come in here and poke shots at different people and then exit the same, lurking hardcore throughout. Good money says that in a large game with as much going on here as there is, this is tactical scum lurking. Lynch2 should move here, folks.
Here, after AGM has claimed and Quadz stumped he hops on Mothrax early. Once again doesn’t revist Dekes as Lynch2 despite saying he was “fairly scummy” in 1161.
--
Chesskid ISO
–
Chesskid at 88 wrote:YOU CANT GUESS MY POWERS FROM MY NAME
Oh really. You couldn’t guess Roleblocking from a traditional Seductress role (Aphrodite)?
Chesskid at 181 wrote:MY ROLE IS FAR TOO SIMILAR TO HIS I WANT TO KNOW HIS FUCKING SUPER POWER
Here he claims he’s a blocking style power. On the heels of 88 it looks very bad.
Chesskid at 327 wrote:7eah mean dekes is prety obv town no?
Here’s the first direct mention or response to ANY of the three confirmed scum. And it is in his ISO 62, calling Dekes scum obvtown.
The next time any of the scum get mentioned is ISO 84 where he asks for Mothrax to be prodded.
Chesskid at 504 wrote:Eh? I don't make cases.
But your post translates to "don't call me out for lurk2victory and chainlynches4eva wooooooooooo"
Scummy, sir.
Soft response calling Mothrax scummy. No vote of any other followup in sight.
Chesskid at 816 wrote:not at all surprised at AV scum
can we lynch chrono and AV then?
Interesting that AV as scum doesn’t surprise him when AV did not appear at all in his ISO to this point (ISO 119) after Iec outed him.
Chesskid at 957 wrote:common sense would indicate dekes is RB immune
First direct mention of Dekes in his ISO (143).
Chesskid at 990 wrote:Also Dekes does need to clarify if SD is lying about JKing him, or if he is actually immune to JKs, because otherwise we'll have to deal with this omfg someone was lyingggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg shit in endgame
Interesting if only for the unspoken premise in the post that Dekes and SD will both be alive at endgame.
At this point in his ISO we get into the 20 or so posts where Chesskid butchers how statistics work.
Chesskid at 1554 wrote:how about
since there's not a lot of support for a me lynch
and a shitfuckton of support for a mothrax lynch
that probably means he's the scum not me?
KTHXBIE
Attempting to set up the notion that he and ConSpiracy can’t be scum together.
Here’s a good point made by Gandalf that I forgot occurred –
Gandalf wrote:You know what would be hilarious? If chess stole mothrax's fakeclaim and then CS came in and used it not realizing that chess had taken it.
Chesskid at 1805 wrote:why does it matter who I rbed on n1?
Chesskid at 1806 wrote:seeign as they'll be double rbed when I die i'd rather it remain hidden
In context of these two quotes note that later he claimed to have blocked Plum, who died N1.
Chesskid at 1966 wrote:DEKES ANY BREADCRUMBS?
This came after Gemini outed Dekes scum.
That’s all the scum references in Chess’s ISO and after this point it degenerates into Mod WIFOM and “Poor me you are stupid for lynching me” posts.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.