Cobblerfone wrote:Aside: What's the record for longest day one in terms of pages?
This game is in the area of being one of the longest, give or take a few pages.
Zachrulez wrote:Cobblerfone wrote:Aside: What's the record for longest day one in terms of pages?
This game is in the area of being one of the longest, give or take a few pages.
Cobblerfone wrote:blue wrote:dont do that
I swear if you are bored scum I will not feel right at all about my win as town. Especially if it turns out to be VE who's you're partner
Cobblerfone wrote: (which is the most likely partner at this point if you ARE scum).
Cobblerfone wrote:You know what, blue seems to have basically admitted to being scum in his last post.
VOTE: bluepokemon
Cobblerfone wrote:Eh? bigAl, you're the IC, is this right? Because this makes no sense. How is taking positions while giving reasons a scumtell instead of null? Or did I completely forget what converse means?
Cobblerfone wrote:I just hope my realization was wrong.
Cobblerfone wrote:Workdawg wrote:@Cobbler In your post 760, you vote for me and then say "I just hope my realization was wrong."... implying that you hope I flip town. Why would you ever hope the person you are voting for flips town?
No, my realization was that you seemed to have been giving power role tells. Thus I hope I'm wrong about you being a power role. But to tell the truth, I think that if youwerea power role, you would've gotten that hint by now. Seriously. (This is also why I described my read on you as "swingy")
Cobblerfone wrote:There's bigAl the player, then there's bigAl the IC.
The Fonz wrote:Al, Grimm, will you come into the light?
...original scumhunting points vs CF just when I was getting worried about him
bigAl wrote:
Any specific vibes or just general vibes?cy wrote:Vote: BigAl- You havent really done much for a while and I have nothing that makes me say town and I get some scum vibes.
Cy is big on the OMGUS votes - a hard habit to get over.
Workdawg wrote:@Cobbler
You think TWO people are going to hop on my wagon and hammer me down with a week left to the extended deadline? I have to say, you're vote/unvote/vote/unvote is pretty suspicious to me (and would even be if it weren't ON me).
Workdawg wrote:You seem extremely reluctant to vote for me and I wonder if it's because you know I'm town and you don't want to look like the scum who hopped on the wagon to lynch the townie. (scum like to be in the middle of the wagon, typically)
I'm the only other wagon right now, so if you're scum then you seem to be between a rock and a hard place. Vote for me and be caught lynching a townie, or find another wagon (which would require you to lead off against someone else)... or not vote at all, I suppose.
Grimm wrote:I know you explained that you thought his last post on pg 29 was scummy, but I just don't see it. It's like my post later, where I said that either way he was playing against his win condition and that he was being disrespectful to other people. VE saying that it was bad for his TEAM is essentially saying the exact same, but in more specific terms. I've got a gut feeling Blue/Zach will flip town. So this makes me even more suspicious of you because I feel like you're trying to frame Blue and VE with this.
Grimm wrote:This vote seem incredibly opportunistic to me. Especially since you showed little/no suspicion of Blue up until this point and then suddenly he claims scum when you and everyone else knows Blue was a freaking idiot. Yeah. No.
Grimm wrote:And again,buddying upasking a question to the IC to get a fair answer.
Grimm wrote:And then there's bigAl the townie-IC and bigAl the scummer-IC. You can't let it slide the fact that he's the IC. What that does say is that, as an IC, he's more talented in covering up scumminess, so you should scrutinize him even more. At least that's how I see it.
cymru96 wrote:The thing that cobbler said about getting tired of the day seems suspicious... are you just trying to end it to take the pressure away from you?
I dunno - I point out that his argument doesn't hold much water in #723 and a couple days later he switches to me for mostly unspecified "vibes". Maybe I'm using OMGUS wrong, but it seemed a bit retaliatory to me.Grimm wrote:BigAl wrote:Cy is big on the OMGUS votes - a hard habit to get over.
I don't really see this so much as and OMGUS vote as it is a "let's put a little pressure on him" vote along with newbiness and his "scum vibes." Are you trying to down-play a potential townie's opinions and attempts to play the game, sir? That seems scummy to me.
bigAl wrote:I dunno - I point out that his argument doesn't hold much water in #723 and a couple days later he switches to me for mostly unspecified "vibes". Maybe I'm using OMGUS wrong, but it seemed a bit retaliatory to me.
VisceraEyes wrote:All I see as 'points' against me was his insistence that I had MULTIPLE oversights/misinterpretations/exaggerations/whatever (I got to type it again! ^^)
Grimmjow wrote:
The Fonz wrote:Al, Grimm, will you come into the light?
...original scumhunting points vs CF just when I was getting worried about him
Fonz, I'm not changing my stance. Sorry, buddy.
VE wrote:Any hit to town is a big hit, especially in a game with 9 players. Do you realize that with 8 players, it STILL takes 5 votes to lynch someone? Those are BIG percentages my guy. Lynching a townie is NOT an option...especially since we're on Majority Vote mode with THREE WEEKS to make a final decision. The fact that you think of losing me as an acceptable loss is...telling.
VE wrote:Okay, in the name of no longer being in the 'Not Voting' line,
VOTE: bluepokemon1234
Barring some kind of scum-claim, and unless someone can provide sufficient reason for switching, this is my final vote.
Cobblerfone wrote:
By the way, here's some posts I dug up:
VE wrote:Any hit to town is a big hit, especially in a game with 9 players. Do you realize that with 8 players, it STILL takes 5 votes to lynch someone? Those are BIG percentages my guy. Lynching a townie is NOT an option...especially since we're on Majority Vote mode with THREE WEEKS to make a final decision. The fact that you think of losing me as an acceptable loss is...telling.
An appeal to emotion when he wasn't even in danger. (and wrong as the only way we get 8 players is if we vote no-lynch which was what he was doing at the time.)
Cobbler wrote:He didn't hold up to this. (Heck blue scumclaimed!)
VisceraEyes wrote:
bluepokemon is WHY we've been contending with BOTH of those things. It's true, I don't so much think he's scum...per se. But if he played ANY better, if he posted ANY more clearly...I'd be CERTAIN he's scum, for these reasons.With bluepokemon gone, we should have a decent environment to sniff out the enemies of the state.