"You fucked up" meant that you played the Silver/Zeph vs Pine dichotomy badly. You made mistakes, got overly emotional, pushed too hard, alienated the voter you needed, and failed to make your case. Uite screwed up too, in that he chose wrong, but all three of you share the blame. Equally, I'd say, though for different reasons.
Where the fuck did I say that Pine?
Are you High?
Where do you get, I'm getting solely blamed for the loss by Uite means I played this game fucking perfectly and did no wrong?
Gambits to protect someone (my Silver gambit, for instance) tend to be disliked, but usually work out well. (Silver WAS town!)
Gambits to get someone LYNCHED (my Vig Claim, Zepher claiming JOAT with a result contradicting KoC's obv-crumb), tend to universally get people shouting, "I. WANT. TO. BLACKLIST. YOU."
Gambits to protect someone (my Silver gambit, for instance) tend to be disliked, but usually work out well. (Silver WAS town!)
Gambits to get someone LYNCHED (my Vig Claim, Zepher claiming JOAT with a result contradicting KoC's obv-crumb), tend to universally get people shouting, "I. WANT. TO. BLACKLIST. YOU."
Mason-outing would have been done by me regardless.
Or if not me, SOMEONE. (And woulda been a good thing, but the lover thing...)
Masons pretty much always get outed on Day One.
Maybe it's the fact that their play is (if not consciously, then subconsciously) almost identical to scum play. I could elaborate on this, but it makes sense if you think about it.
I don't really want to comment much on this game. There are a large number of reasons I wasn't happy with it.
That being said, quadz did a wonderful job. The pictures of trikes were absolutely amusing, and the game flowed very nicely from a moderated standpoint.
Mastin, try to avoid /inning in games behind me, as I'll probably /out if you do.