HellloooNewman wrote:So, I OMGUS'd the 3rd or 4th one on my wagon?
You OMGUS'd the only person on your wagon who isn't conftown.
IceGuy wrote:You OMGUS'd the only person on your wagon who isn't conftown.
# | Name | Minimum Bid | Current Bid | Auction Length | Countdown |
12 | Auction Detective x 2 | $25 | - | 5 days | (expired on 2011-07-11 13:00:00) |
13 | Commuter x 2 | $25 | - | 5 days | (expired on 2011-07-11 13:00:00) |
14 | Doctor x 2 | $40 | - | 5 days | (expired on 2011-07-11 13:00:00) |
15 | Love Potion x 1 | $25 | - | 5 days | (expired on 2011-07-11 13:00:00) |
16 | Medium x 3 | $25 | - | 5 days | (expired on 2011-07-11 13:00:00) |
17 | Night-kill x 1 | $50 | $190 | 7 days | (expired on 2011-07-13 13:00:00) |
18 | Ninja x 4 | $25 | - | 3 days | (expired on 2011-07-09 13:00:00) |
19 | Roleblocker x 3 | $50 | - | 5 days | (expired on 2011-07-11 13:00:00) |
20 | Tracker x 2 | $10 | $10 | 3 days | (expired on 2011-07-09 13:00:00) |
21 | Watcher x 1 | $20 | $20 | 7 days | (expired on 2011-07-13 13:00:00) |
HellloooNewman wrote:@ Mod - Is the current high bid on NK correct? I bid $190, am not the high bidder, but the auction lists high bidder @ $190?
The Rules, Section III wrote:The ability "Extra Vote x 2" is in the marketplace. It has a starting bid of $10, but no current bid as of yet.
Magua has $100. He sends a PM that includes “Maximum Bid: Extra Vote x 2, $50”. This costs Magua $1 immediately. Magua is now the highest bidder for "Extra Vote x 2", with a current bid of $10 (the minimum amount required to win). He has $99, but $50 of that is in escrow in case he wins the auction -- he really can only spend $49.
Faraday has $100. He sends a PM that includes “Maximum Bid: Extra Vote x 2, $40.” This costs Faraday $1 immediately. Magua remains the highest bidder, with a current bid of $40(Magua’s bid was earlier than Faraday’s; if it had not been, Magua would be the highest bidder with a current bid of $41). Faraday has $99, and can spend $99. Magua still has $99, and can still only spend $49.
Ethos wrote:
Mal and Bobsnox are far from confirmed town or town at all. You continue to attempt to ignore the fact that my vote on you was placed before you began attacking HN and still somehow manage to continue pushing your flimsy and weak transaction accusation despite how obvious it is that it's incorrect.
IceyGuy wrote:I don't see any justification for your vote except that you're defending Newman at all costs and I'm one of his attackers.
Ethos wrote:Your vote and incredibly opportunistic push on HN was just the final straw and solidified my suspicions of you. My vote was placed on you before you attempted to 'attack' HN so I'm unsure how you're attempting to link the two actions furthermore if I was attempting to just attack the people attacking HN I wouldn't have stated I had a town-read on Seacore and Hiphop the leading attacks of him in my previous post.
IceyGuy wrote:Ethos seems to be trying very hard to start a wagon on me without providing any justification.
Ethos wrote:You've just attempted to construct an entire made up transaction record to place your vote on him without even mentioning that it takes him to L-2 furthermore you've avoided discussing the lynch yesterday which you were not part of, the items up for auction today, the abilities won yesterday and much more.
IceyGuy wrote:At this moment,neither you nor Newman have provided any explanations for, and why Newman claimed different bid amounts), instead preferring to attack me.my questions(why you voted me without a case
malpascp wrote:Anyone has an idea of what this means?
Ethos wrote:
This is a blatant lie, you haven't attempted to ask me a single question through our entire conversation and I outright challenge you to quote and provide them.
IceGuy wrote:Yeah, my post was a shot from the hip. What it actually boils down to: I attacked him after others attacked him (partly simply due to time zone differences), I voiced my suspicions and didn't just jump on the wagon, and I am not conftown. This makes me the primary target for scum trying to force a mislynch.
IceGuy wrote:At this moment, neither you nor Newman have provided any explanations for my questions (why you voted me without a case,and why Newman claimed different bid amounts), instead preferring to attack me. Since I'm sure Newman will not be placed at L-1 or hammered before the mod's explanation, I believe my vote is currently in the right place.
HellloooNewman wrote:
Re: 189 vs. 190 - when I said 189 I was going off the top of my head, using the math that made sense. When you guys freaked out, I went through my pm's to get exact amounts.
IceGuy wrote: When I point out that you don't have a justification for something, like I did in ISO 14 and 22, or when I say there is no plausible explanation (ISO 13), this means that I consider you scummy until you provide me with a justification/explanation, and you did not. Yes, it is not a "question" in the formal sense, but it boils down to the same.
HellloooNewman wrote:
Ummm.....learn to read? Here, I'll quote it for you!
HellloooNewman wrote:
Re: 189 vs. 190 - when I said 189 I was going off the top of my head, using the math that made sense. When you guys freaked out, I went through my pm's to get exact amounts.
Ethos wrote:
And those were answered a long time ago as quoted in my previous post, you just attempted to find any form of reasoning to jump your vote over and ended up stating that two people didn't answer your "questions" which weren't really questions and were both responded to.
IceGuy wrote:HellloooNewman wrote:
Ummm.....learn to read? Here, I'll quote it for you!
HellloooNewman wrote:
Re: 189 vs. 190 - when I said 189 I was going off the top of my head,. When you guys freaked out, I went through my pm's to get exact amounts.using the math that made sense
So the number off the top of your head was "189", whereas the actual number was "190"? How did you arrive at that number?
IceGuy wrote:Then please provide me with a quote containing your justification for your vote in post #239 which does not exclusively refer to events after this post.
#201:
hiphop wrote:Am I the only one who sees that nk went for $100? Which means that town does not have it, but mafia.
Oh and because I did not win any auctions yesterday, and had invested money at the start of the day yesterday, I fully intend to win an ability today. I was thinking nk, thoughts?
#202:
Seacore wrote:Of course hiphop, I made the connection the moment Night landed and then promptly forgot. Excellent job picking that up.
That means
1. Doc protected target
2. WLC won the NK.
3. Scum held on to the kill.
However, if that's the case, then we must assume that no other scum were in a position to outbid him, because why wouldn't they have just bid $1 more?
There's the possibility that there is town with lots of money and they did that... but still.
Yes hiphop, throw all of your money down on the NK. Good job!
#207:
hiphop wrote:Nk is currently at $117, Either
A: town had bid on it, before I said something.
B: Scum had bid on it.
And if it is scum, would it be more likely someone that has posted in day 2, or a lurker?