Stream of conciousness thoughts:
I guess the place to start here is to finally explain the comment I made about krew's townieness. it's a small thing, as can be expected this early in the game. Remember I said "the only townie thing thus far." Post 14, right out of the bat, is a very townie post. At the beginning of the game, a
townie should be working to maximize every little opportunity to create information. Krew does that by escuing a random vote, and voting for
something of substance really early. It is not in scums best interest, usually, to take an active role in ending the randomness that usually defines
the early part of the game. Therefore, krew's 14 reads deliciously townie to me.
Lord chronos' 15, however, strikes me as wrong, conditionally. If he's talking about krew's out of game behavior, then I can see voting early for him
in game, but based on his one post, the claim "I don't like you right now" reads completely false.
Jedo votes for me, which seems to be a null tell. It's often the case that rather then scumhunting weaker players tend to vote for those players who are making themselves most prominent, rather than those who are actually acting in ways that don't help the town, and I certainly was
attracting attention to myself page one. However, scum do this too because they don't know how to look for scum when they know who they are. This merits further watching, but alone it means nothing.
My discussion with zang has been well documented. if that is his meta it is exceedingly stupid, if it isn't, he's scum. He could still be scum anyway, one of the main reasons to cultivate a deliberately anti-town meta is to be able to get away with doing anti town things when scum. I like my vote on him
UTs 26 is off to me. Earlier he suggested that I dk krew, which, was probably a joke, but when I responded seriously, instead of admitting that it was a joke and moving on, he simply said "I never said he was scum." i don't get that, are you claiming that you want me to day vig a player you don't see as scum? That is senseless.
voidedmafia's 30 would be fine...Asking for why a player holds opinions is almost always good but as I discussed in depth, it was literally the only thing he'd done up to that point in the game, which is a major problem. The subsequent back and forth I had with him about it showcases the point pretty well, in my opinion, and I think the fact that he had, up to that point, declined to vote and then tried to piggy back on others analysis He even had to be goaded by me into voting me for not sharing I'm going to come back to this later.
Jedo the jedi tells us there is a good chance that they are both town, and is voting me. Now, this comment was jumped on by LC, and i think rightfully so. Jedo, has, subsequently, claimed that he made the comment based on simple probabilities. If this is so, it is a worthless comment to make. it is literally always true. taken through this lens, and taken with the content jedo gave us before where he voted for a player for being the most visable rather than being the most anti-town, I think its safe to say that Jedo is trying to look like he's scum hunting, rather than actually scum hunting. It is true that scum is less often hung day one then town, but that is not a reason to resign yourself to a town lynch day one, which is what it seems he's advocating. I would be very interested in seeing jedo swing today.
PBug gets me.
post 80 by skrew is bad bad bad scumsuckscummy. note the subtle change in language "now has it occurred to you that maybe tsq has a reason for not telling the town why I'm town?" That's weasel words, folks. I never said that krew was town. I said he had done the most town thing I'd seen so far on early day 1. Those two statements are so vastly different that it is astounding. Here he is also implying that I might have some role based info that says he is town, and this is at best trying to give himself undeserved townie points and at worst role fishing.
Major FOS: Krew here.
Zangs 83: "4. I don't see why TSQ or anybody else would have any reason for witholding information from the town. This also doesn't answer my question, why do you think he is town." There are reasons. In this case, my reason was because I thought the discussion about me and krew would be more valuable at the early stages of the game then I thought me saying "he broke out of the randomness" early would be. Furthermore, I wanted to get voided to comment more on the game, which, I will note, he still hasn't done, other than to keep calling for me to tell him what I saw he has provided close to zero analysis on the game so far, just responded when he is attacked, and asked me to present him with things he's not searching for himself.
The IS/LC-Voided interaction is interesting. Don't know what I think about it just yet.
Krew's post 96 is also an awful, whiney "woe is me post." However, both townies and scummies have been known to use appeals to emotion when they are being pressured.
Note very carefully my post 102 and the posts that followed it. I say that I will try to get my analysis up by a certain day, and that people should
vote for me after that because the pressure might help. Voided mafia and small people (another who has done next to nothing the whole game) jump right on it without even giving me the time period I asked for. its almost as if they were hoping I'd get rung up before I could post it.
Voided gets a little better on page 5, but still, mostly it is a catalyst coming from being pressured by IS. He is not doing anything this game but defending himself. not scumhunting at all.
I would be interested in seeing any of voidedmafia, zedo, krew, or smallpeoples to swing today. I'm pretty flexible. I could probably be convinced of zang as well. Probably the order I find people scummy is Voided, small, zedo, krew. Subsequently, I think a
vote: Voided
is in order.
sorry that took so long to get up, folks.