Rodion wrote:Vote: David Xanatos
French people are harmless: check about every war they ever "fought" in.
No mass name-claiming, that would be absolutely pointless.
Rodion wrote:Vote: David Xanatos
French people are harmless: check about every war they ever "fought" in.
Killer wrote:I can't think of anything
VOTE: Vezok
3French wrote:VOTE: Easjo i replaced him in another game
DavidX wrote:Unvote: Chevre
Vote: ThreeIsFrench
First rule of society. Never trust the Frenchies.
Marco wrote:Why are people pushing the vezok lynch?
Rodion wrote:On vezok: I agree that a mass nameclaim is neutral at best for town and it consequently should not be done. I don't think his request warrants a speedlynch, though (I don't know whether people are serious about it or it is just part of the jokevote stage),but a pressure for him to fullclaim seems good.
killerjester wrote:Vifam wrote:How does that make name claiming non-optimal play? If it's not the standard Good vs Bad Guy scenario, what is the problem?
Trying to guess out the PR's in the town. For instance, House M.D. (if used) would more likely than not be a doctor or some saving role. To fit the character.
vezokpiraka wrote:killerjester wrote:Vifam wrote:How does that make name claiming non-optimal play? If it's not the standard Good vs Bad Guy scenario, what is the problem?
Trying to guess out the PR's in the town. For instance, House M.D. (if used) would more likely than not be a doctor or some saving role. To fit the character.
That is complete bulshit.
Last game every single role was randomized. Spider man was a neighbourizer.
I suggest a mass name claim because it starts discussion because I like to be in character.
marco1610 wrote:MagnaofIllusion wrote:Marco wrote:Why are people pushing the vezok lynch?
Why didn’t you place some sort of RVS stage vote?
Because we have lots of time left. My question was rhetorical, by the way.
Vifam wrote:marco1610 wrote:MagnaofIllusion wrote:Marco wrote:Why are people pushing the vezok lynch?
Why didn’t you place some sort of RVS stage vote?
Because we have lots of time left. My question was rhetorical, by the way.
I don't understand...you didn't want to RVS in a 27 man game because you were afraid we are gonna lynch?
lol?
marco1610 wrote:Vifam wrote:marco1610 wrote:MagnaofIllusion wrote:Marco wrote:Why are people pushing the vezok lynch?
Why didn’t you place some sort of RVS stage vote?
Because we have lots of time left. My question was rhetorical, by the way.
I don't understand...you didn't want to RVS in a 27 man game because you were afraid we are gonna lynch?
lol?
I do not understand the confusion. I didn't feel like RNGing a vote because I'm quite lazy and I didn't feel like voting for the first person I see because I know none of you. What's the harm in waiting? I'm not afraid of lynching people, I just didn't bother with voting yet.
Vifam wrote:marco1610 wrote:Vifam wrote:marco1610 wrote:MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why didn’t you place some sort of RVS stage vote?
Because we have lots of time left. My question was rhetorical, by the way.
I don't understand...you didn't want to RVS in a 27 man game because you were afraid we are gonna lynch?
lol?
I do not understand the confusion. I didn't feel like RNGing a vote because I'm quite lazy and I didn't feel like voting for the first person I see because I know none of you. What's the harm in waiting? I'm not afraid of lynching people, I just didn't bother with voting yet.
Seems like you're falling back on your newbiness to me, but eh, W/E, you're a null tell right now.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Rodion wrote:On vezok: I agree that a mass nameclaim is neutral at best for town and it consequently should not be done. I don't think his request warrants a speedlynch, though (I don't know whether people are serious about it or it is just part of the jokevote stage),but a pressure for him to fullclaim seems good.
In regards to the bolded … um whut????
UNVOTE: Vezok
VOTE: Rodion
Why, if you think pressuing him to fullclaim (which is a scumtastic idea in RVS) is a good plan did you vote DX?
ZeL1nK wrote:VOTE: vezok
Name one thing anti-town about a quick lynch on vezok before he's able to post.
ZeL1nK wrote:Wait, vezok suggested it? I didn't even realise that. It also has nothing to do with why a vezok wagon is a good thing.
There is one pro-town reason I can think of that a vezok wagon doesn't need to happen, though... andrew is in this game. And an andrew wagon is just as good.
I'm conflicted now.
Vifam wrote:No, trust me, those were excuses. It's the RVS stage, and not knowing people is *Not* a legitimate reason, at all. It's important to apply pressure to the players around you, you're "reason" is anti town.
Vifam wrote:And yeah, that's a little better, although misplaced, I'd rather you vote Rod.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:VOTE: vezok
RVS Wagon go.
Also you have dared to challenge the ultimate coolness of my character. You must die.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Rodion wrote:On vezok: I agree that a mass nameclaim is neutral at best for town and it consequently should not be done. I don't think his request warrants a speedlynch, though (I don't know whether people are serious about it or it is just part of the jokevote stage),but a pressure for him to fullclaim seems good.
In regards to the bolded … um whut????
UNVOTE: Vezok
VOTE: Rodion
Why, if you think pressuing him to fullclaim (which is a scumtastic idea in RVS) is a good plan did you vote DX?
vezokpiraka wrote:killerjester wrote:Vifam wrote:How does that make name claiming non-optimal play? If it's not the standard Good vs Bad Guy scenario, what is the problem?
Trying to guess out the PR's in the town. For instance, House M.D. (if used) would more likely than not be a doctor or some saving role. To fit the character.
That is complete bulshit.
Last game every single role was randomized.Spider man was a neighbourizer.
I suggest a mass name claim because it starts discussion because I like to be in character.
Zinger2099 wrote:Earl Hickey present.
marco1610 wrote:Vifam wrote:No, trust me, those were excuses. It's the RVS stage, and not knowing people is *Not* a legitimate reason, at all. It's important to apply pressure to the players around you, you're "reason" is anti town.
You are trying to misdirect anyone reading our back and forth. Implying that I refused to vote. Almost seems like you're trying to implicate me without actual evidence.
Vifam wrote:And yeah, that's a little better, although misplaced, I'd rather you vote Rod.
I think I'll keep my vote on you for now. Considering the trick you're trying to pull.