Mass Effect Mafia (Draw)

[nintendoaddict1]

see above Marco, I actually hit submit too early and didnt finish it.

I was taking reads from Nintendo on his scum partners in a game where he was scum, and comparing them to who are his town reads here on the basis we can get info from his flip later. I wanted to see if he gave town reads on his scum partners (which is why i asked him for town reads in this game) and try to get a Meta on him.

You asked me for town reads before I gave you the link to the games I've been in, so, are you saying that you are only asking me for town reads in THIS game because of the reads I gave in another game(which I only linked to you AFTER you asked fro town reads from me)?

[marco1610]

Ah. Now it makes sense.

PS. Friday came early where you live?

[nintendoaddict1]

Seem thats the thing,.... I really dont even know myself what you are pushing now.

You ask me why I keep pushing something, then, say you don't know what I am pushing?

[Rhinox]

If it's of any consequence, I think both Jason and Nintendo are town. Not like I haven't seen the "lying gambit" before as well. Reck's hosted WoW game had a liar that was town on Day 1, who gambited against another town by lying.

I am more concerned with the players who are coming in and making jabs at the top suspects while allowing the more vocal players to push the lynches.

So who are those players then?

-----------------------

I have no fucking clue what jason and nintendo are going on about. @People saying they're VI's, you have games to back that up? Having never played with either of them, Nintendo is looking more scummy of the pair, basically insisting that jason is scum for no real reason. I haven't seen a good, real reason presented for how Jason is scum. Marco jumping off ender and into this crap distracting argument doesn't make me happy. Ghost saying he's ready to hammer ender and then jumping in to vote nintendo doesn't make me happy. The last 8 pages of this game, really, does not make me happy.

[ShadowGuru]

@Jason: I feel I must remind you before the mod does, since you've been escalating.

10.Gratuitous use of caps lock (or the appearance thereof) can and will get you warned, modkilled, or force-replaced. Mod discretion. If you think it's overkill, it probably is.

WALL OF DEAD, PART ONE

But that's it, I am now going to spend an hour talking in little baby words to explain EXACTLY what Jason was saying and Nintendo (and Hiraki to a lesser extent) has misrepped him so thoroughly.

Let's do a little preliminary first, though. Jason is not the only one Nintendo has tried misrepping. Hiraki, too:

Toog is town.

...

Other than that, Toog is mighty fine. His first vote is actually glorious.

But that's the point.

Scum don't take these high risk maneuvers. They fit in with the crowd.

Toog has done too many things that aren't good townie to allow me to see him as town.

Ender, and probably Jason.

First you say Toog is town, then you don't see him as town, now you don't put him in your scumlist?

While this one isn't as blatant as the others, Hiraki's post was an obvious, obvious spelling error. Oh wait, Nintendo tried to keep pushing the issue:

The second is written incorrectly.

What I meant to say is that Toog has done too many things that have been noted to be scummy or radical. He hasn't fit in with the crowd, he's made himself stand out.

Can scum do this? Yes.

Are we lynching plausible scum who can do this on D1? No.

Excuses for a mistake you didn't catch before posting.

AND SO IT BEGINS:

Marco is a newbie though.

So? you can't just give people free passes on the Newbie card, its dangerous. Scummy is scummy regardless of new or seasoned. If you think someone is scummy, you vote them.

Interesting defending here I feel.

The post that started it all. In little baby words:

"Just because someone is a new player does not mean you should say 'that person is just a big dumb new person so what he says is not evil.' Evil is evil even if that person is a big dumb new person. If you think someone is evil, you vote them because you think that person is evil. I think it is wierd that you are saying [Marco] is not evil because he is a big dumb new person because most people do not say that."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"we should kill the big dumb new person because he is big dumb new person

We're not lynching a newbie D1.

The reason you're being so opportunistic is disgusting.

The chain of misreps begins its terrible, terrible life. Curse you, Hiraki.

We're not lynching a newbie D1.

The reason you're being so opportunistic is disgusting.

Im not suggesting we lynch a newbie day 1 and no where have I said that.

WHAT IS SAID:

"I am not saying we should kill a big dumb new person because he is a big dumb new person and I have not said that should kill a big dumb person in other sayings."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"I am not saying we should kill a big dumb new person because he is a big dumb new person but I am thinking about killing the big dumb new person because he is a big dumb new person tomorrow just because."

We're not lynching a newbie D1.

The reason you're being so opportunistic is disgusting.

Im not suggesting we lynch a newbie day 1 and no where have I said that.

You didn't say that, but it's a fact that Macro is a newbie.

He's your lynch for tomorrow, don't lie.

*facepalm*

I redirect you to the post where I originally rip apart the case, in which I refer to the Loaded Question.

We're not lynching a newbie D1.

The reason you're being so opportunistic is disgusting.

Im not suggesting we lynch a newbie day 1 and no where have I said that.

You didn't say that, but it's a fact that Macro is a newbie.

He's your lynch for tomorrow, don't lie.

False, I do not setup lynches on a day to day basis nor do I chain lynch. I do not even see Marco as scummy right now. I was just pointing out you cant excuse scummy on the newbie card.

Very nice misrep.

WHAT IS SAID:

"You are wrong and I do not kill plan to kill big dumb new persons after killing other people. I do not think the big dumb new person [Marco] is evil. I was just saying that you can't say the big dumb new person isn't evil because he is a big dumb new person. You are good at saying I said things I didn't say.

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"LOL I still think the big new person should die because he is a big dumb new person.[/i]

Of course you don't in game, but I'm just saying what's in your head.

*slapping sounds*

how do you know what is in my head?

WHAT IS SAID:

"How can you know things other people, like me since you talk to me, think?"

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"Wow I was thinking that and you knew I was thinking that you are amazing."

inception.

The funny part is, you've never denied that this wasn't in your head.

Your turn shall come.

*slap* *slap*

how do you know what is in my head?

Wait, you're not den- hold on. Lookie what was on the next page!

The funny part is, you've never denied that this wasn't in your head.

FoS jason

*Oh god! oh god the pain its in my head-*

^^ lol nice try.

"LOL you are good at saying things I did not say.

I think it is self evident what my last post meant.. you are both attempting to put words in my mouth.

WHAT IS SAID:

"It is very obvious what I just said ['You are good at saying things I did not say']. [Hiraki and Nintendo] are saying things I did not say."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"Oh man you big meanies caught me being evil."

Still not denying it. I'd vote you, but my vote is already on your partner.

I think it is self evident what my last post meant.. you are both attempting to put words in my mouth.

Still not denying it. I'd vote you, but my vote is already on your partner.

Stop pushing something on something I didn't even say. You are now pushing a case of ' What you were thinking but didn't say in thread' which is complete BS. How do you know what I was or was not thinking.

Lets see...

I say It is not right to give a pass on a Newbie, even though I don't think he did anything scummy. I would not use the newbie card if I did think he was scummy as a way to explain it.

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was thinking it, and didn't deny it.

Its not up to me to deny it, it is now up to you as my accuser to prove I was thinking that.... can you do that? if not, then you have nothing. Your case is weak at best.

WHAT IS SAID:

"Stop saying I said things I didn't say, because I didn't say them. Because you cannot find me saying bad words you are now saying I am 'thinking bad words' and that is dumb. You cannot know what other people, like me, are thinking. I say it is not good to say a big dumb new person is not evil because he is a big dumb new person, but I don't think that big dumb new person is scummy. I would not explain [Marco] being evil by saying he is a big dumb new person, because if I thought a big dumb new person was evil I would vote that person. [Hiraki] says things I didn't say, those bad words that I didn't say being 'I am evil and want to kill the big dumb new person for being a big dumb new person.' So I say I didn't say those words I didn't say, because I didn't say those words, and so [Hiraki] says that I was thinking those bad words but didn't say the bad words because I am evil. It is not up to me to say I was not thinking words I did not think, because I was not thinking those bad words. It is up to [Nintendo] to prove that I was thinking those bad words, but since you can't prove I was thinking those bad words then you should not be saying I was thinking about those bad words. Even at its very best possible being your case is very bad."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"oh no they caught be thinking bad words with there mind pwoer what do i do now becaus i am evil?!!!111"

Pushing on something you didn't say? Exactly! You still haven't denied it being true. Three times now you have dodged this issue while redirecting to me. Never said I knew what you were or were not thinking, how's that for pushing something I didn't say? You're doing the same thing now.

It's not that I think you were setting up a lynch, but your refusal to deny that was what you were doing in the first place that makes you scummy.

Why is it not up to you to deny it? We are questioning YOU about something YOU did, yet, You will not answer unless we have evidence? How about dodging the issue here? Is that not enough evidence for you?

Reading these words is like punching a molten hot rod through my dick. It is brain poison.

What is it exactly I did apart from attacking someones stance of giving a newbie a seemingly free pass for something he would vote a non newbie for?

WHAT IS SAID:

"What did I do other than say I disagree with someone saying a big dumb new person is not evil because he is a big dumb new person. [Hiraki] would vote for [Marco] for what [Marco] did if [Marco] was not a big dumb new person."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"if i can't see it it can't see me i so scared

TO BE CONTINUED...

[ShadowGuru]

WALL OF DEATH, PART TWO

What is it exactly I did apart from attacking someones stance of giving a newbie a seemingly free pass for something he would vote a non newbie for?

Now you're just plain ignoring the post completely.

Screw it.

Unvote, Vote: jason

You need to die first.

"Where did he touch you, Wraith? Where did the dumb man touch you?"

*points at forehead*

"See? Look how traumatized this poor guy is."

Im not ignoring the post I just dont need to deny anything as I never even so much as implied it in the first place. what you are pushing is plain crap.

Its a null issue, close to a void issue and you seem intent on strawmanning it.

Please show any indication that I was thinking that I could be setting up tomorrows lynch. Can you? if not then I don't need to deny anything. Only if you could show indication of me thinking it can I then deny or confirm anything.

WHAT IS SAID:

"I am not not reading the post I just don't need to say I didn't say something I didn't say, because I didn't say it. I didn't even suggest I was thinking or saying those bad words. You case is dumb. It is not an important thing to worry about, but you think it is very important and are saying that I am a bad person because I said things I didn't say. Please show that you can actually read the minds of other people, like me, which proves that I was going to kill the big dumb new person tomorrow for being a big dumb new person. Can you? If you can't then I don't need to say anything more on this issue. Only if you show that I was actually thinking about bad words do I need to say anything else about it."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"lolol im not suspicious lolol can't touch dis

Im not ignoring the post I just dont need to deny anything as I never even so much as implied it in the first place. what you are pushing is plain crap.

Its a null issue, close to a void issue and you seem intent on strawmanning it.

Please show any indication that I was thinking that I could be setting up tomorrows lynch. Can you? if not then I don't need to deny anything. Only if you could show indication of me thinking it can I then deny or confirm anything.

You know what you sound like right now? "I'm not saying if I set him up for a lynch... but I'm not saying if I didn't either."

You are deliberately withholding information that is CONSTANTLY being asked of you, for what? Cause you think it's a crap case. Wow. Of course scum would say that when they are shitting themselves. Any indication you were thinking of setting up lynches?

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was

thinking

it, and didn't deny it.

Out of your own mouth, no less.

So at certain points I will explain what Nintendo is saying is trollspeak:

"lol u say u not saying he should die but u no deny it. Y U NO DENY? lol u not admit to being evil that means u evil"

See, this is a loaded question, once again. Nintendo asks

"Are you evil?"

Jason responds

"No, I'm not evil."

And Nintendo says back

"OF COURSE SCUM WOULD DENY THEY'RE EVIL DUH"

Here's a history lesson. Or an urban legend, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was during. Back when people thought witches existed, and hunted them, they had this test. They would throw a "witch" in the water, and if the woman drowned, dying, she would be found innocent of being a witch. But if she didn't sink and drown (by, I don't know, swimming?), she would be branded a witch for these arcane techniques known as "treading water." Of course, Nintendo goes even farther with his special, trademarked brand of craplogic:

Jason responds

"If I'm so evil then prove it."

Nintendo says

"YOU ADMIT IT HA CAUGHT YOU!"

Excuse me a moment, I'll be grabbing some brain bleach.

You aren't seeing his contradiction. He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

*chug chug chug*

Oh wow, now that I've actually taken the effort to put two-and-two together I realize that Hiraki/nintendo's beef with Jason is totally contrived and a blatant misrep.

Unvote Vote; Nintendo

Hiraki's is ewewewew but Nintendo is the one blowing the issue out of proportion and basically sheeping Hiraki. Maybe I'll make a more detailed explanation for this later, if I'm bored.

--Wraith

You aren't seeing his contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

WHAT RUBBISH! SHOW ME WHERE I SAID I WAS SETTING UP THE LYNCH. SHOW ME WORD FOR WORD RIGHT NOW! I never once said that. I was accused of it though Hak accused me off it!

this is how it unfolds.

I am willing to strike a deal right now with the entire town.

Lynch me today. If I flip town, tomorrow, no if ands or buts, you lynch Reck. I don't give a shit if a Cop scans him innocent. He dies.

NO, No chain lynches, no setting up next days lynch on a deal.

Lynch on evedience and scummyness. not chain lynches and deals. I would like to know why Reck is setting up ( or alluding to setup) a chain lynch on myself.. however I don't really think Reck is worth a lynch right now.

Hell, im being accused of something I had earlier said is a no go... no chain lynches. but it moves on Hik says this, and the rest is this bullshit arguement. All because I don't agree with the Newbie card, a stance I have taken in MANY games.

Marco is a newbie though.

So? you can't just give people free passes on the Newbie card, its dangerous. Scummy is scummy regardless of new or seasoned. If you think someone is scummy, you vote them.

Interesting defending here I feel.

We're not lynching a newbie D1.

The reason you're being so opportunistic is disgusting.

There he completly misreps me saying I am being opertunistic and claiming I am looking a newbie lynch..

Im not suggesting we lynch a newbie day 1 and no where have I said that.

You didn't say that, but it's a fact that Macro is a newbie.

He's your lynch for tomorrow, don't lie.

Here Hik even admits I didnt say it, then the I was thinking it crap comes in

False, I do not setup lynches on a day to day basis nor do I chain lynch. I do not even see Marco as scummy right now. I was just pointing out you cant excuse scummy on the newbie card.

Very nice misrep.

Of course you don't in game, but I'm just saying what's in your head.

That is where Nintendo pops in pushing the crap. The rest is all on this page.

Now point out there, where I was setting up a lynch, indicating I was setting up a lynch or show thought of setting up a lynch. Actually, you said I said I was setting up the lynch... NOW SHOW ME EXACTLY WHERE I SAID I WAS SETTING UP A LYNCH...

Nintendo is scum.

unvote
vote: Nintendo

WHAT IS SAID:

"You are a big fat liar. Show me where I said these bad words that I didn't actually say! In fact, the bad thing you are saying I said I want to do [chain lynching] is something I said even earlier in the game that I

did not want to do anyways.

Hiraki lied about me saying bad things and even says that I didn't actually say the bad things he says I said. Then [Nintendo] comes in and lies about be more. Nintendo is evil. I vote for Nintendo to die for being evil.

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"lol im evil"

The big fall through in Jason's big attack is that I thought he was scum before Jason.

Jason isn't even that big of a point. In fact, I was just having a little bit of fun by way of pestering Jason.

Nothing big. But I guess he would try to make a mountain out of a molehill from it. It's the only thing that's been pointed towards him thus far. (pst. you should read into what this is saying)

DIE. DIE FOR MAKING ME SUFFER

(By the way, this is Hiraki saying

"lol was just trollin" *trollface*

)

OH WOW.. what a twist and complete misrep on what I said.

I was not admitting to thinking it, I was saying what your 'case' was that you are pushing on me.

Read it in the context it was meant. and stop misrepping what I said.

WHAT IS SAID:

"Wow what a big fat lie about what I said, liar. Please read things the right way and not be a big dummy."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"lol im evil lol"

Nintendo, why have you ignored our posts proving you are misreppnig..especially the 'I actually said it' claim by you that has been proven wrong and why are you sticking so close to Hiraki? you really are sheeping him to the point I feel you could be trying to buddy him.

WHAT IS SAID:

"Nintendo, why have not read all our posts proving you are a liar on purpose? [me, Jason, Hiraki] have all said that I didn't say those bad words I didn't actually say, so why are you trying to be friends with Hiraki? You are repeating his trollwords so much that you are trying to be his bestest best friend."

WHAT IS NOT SAID:

"I am not going to answer your questions because i am teh evil lol. i gonna kill you cuz i evil" *trollface*

Nintendo, why have you ignored our posts proving you are misreppnig..especially the 'I actually said it' claim by you that has been proven wrong and why are you sticking so close to Hiraki? you really are sheeping him to the point I feel you could be trying to buddy him.

Oh, me? I'm not gonna answer your questions, I'm just gonna dodge around them.

Sound familiar? It's what you were doing. I haven't ignored them. See? I gave you an answer right there and you know what? It wasn't hard. I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

And I'm not that stupid as to go and try to buddy to someone who is always gonna think I'm scum anyway.

*facedesk*

*pound*

*pound, pound*

*pound*

*crash*

TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES, PLEASE STAND BY

[ShadowGuru]

WALL OF DEATH, PART THREE

I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

Oh really?

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was

thinking

it, and didn't deny it.

Out of your own mouth, no less.

WHAT IS SAID:

[proves Nintendo is lying through his stupid ugly smirk]

Nintendo, why have you ignored our posts proving you are misreppnig..especially the 'I actually said it' claim by you that has been proven wrong and why are you sticking so close to Hiraki? you really are sheeping him to the point I feel you could be trying to buddy him.

Oh, me? I'm not gonna answer your questions, I'm just gonna dodge around them.

Sound familiar?

No, I had nothing to answer what-so ever as has been pointed out to you by quite a few people as I had never said or said I thought) in the first place.. I didn't dodge anything because I had no case to answer, and frankly what you were pushing was so funny it was absurd. . You however do have a lot to answer for!

I had nothing to answer therefor didn't have to answer anything

you however have been proven to be constantly misrepping me and twisting that I am misrepping you. You have a lot to answer for.

WHAT IS SAID:

"I am going to not answer those questions I've already answer two times because I've already answered them two times. Other people have also answered your fat dumb questions."

I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

Oh really?

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

It gets majorly twisted to I was setting up a lynch tomorrow.

I say no... the case is now I was

thinking

it, and didn't deny it.

Out of your own mouth, no less.

Never said you set up the lynch. I said you were THINKING about it. And I've said this, what, three times now? Yet, you are still trying to say I said you WERE setting up the lynch, when all along I have been saying you were THINKING about it.

So this is about the point where I start hating all life that has ever existed, and also where Nintendo's posts begin wasting the infinite storage space of the internet. In fact, he contradicts himself THREE TIMES in this very post. Jason pointed out in the quoted Jason post in this quoted Nintendo post but the hammer needs to keep banging.

contradiction. He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

Never said you set up the lynch. I said you were THINKING about it. And I've said this, what, three times now? Yet, you are still trying to say I said you WERE setting up the lynch, when all along I have been saying you were THINKING about it

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

What's that Voice-In-My-Head-That-Tells-Me-To-Burn-Things? There's 10 MORE pages of this offense to animal intelligence?

...

...

...

...

...

*grabs lighter*

Excuse me.

[xRECKONERx]

Why is the Nintendo wagon not going to flip scum, In your opinion, Reck? he has admitted to lying and twisting to get a lynch.. that is scum, what town motivation is there for that?

I. Never. Lied. I said they were misreps. Now you are just misrepping what I said.

You DID lie before admitting they were misreps, IIRC.

Where.

Saying you had a case, when you knew it was made up of nothing but misreps and had no actual case is lying.

this in and of itself is a stupid thing to say and a terrible justification for 'YOU LIE'

[Rhinox]

Shadow, you're now officially my hero.

The question is, is nintendo scum, or is he really just all... well... that ^^^ ?

[nintendoaddict1]

contradiction. He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

Never said you set up the lynch. I said you were THINKING about it. And I've said this, what, three times now? Yet, you are still trying to say I said you WERE setting up the lynch, when all along I have been saying you were THINKING about it

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

You know what? The whole "The case was now I was thinking it and didn't deny it" bit? I really read that as him saying "I was thinking it."

[SpyreX]

If its quotes and doesn't fit on my screen I'm not reading it, fyi.

I'll go out on a limb and say nintendo is still town because call it a hunch that fits with the mess that is this page.

[ShadowGuru]

contradiction. He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch. Check my last post.

I never said you said "I set up the lynch". Who's misrepping now?

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

Never said you set up the lynch. I said you were THINKING about it. And I've said this, what, three times now? Yet, you are still trying to say I said you WERE setting up the lynch, when all along I have been saying you were THINKING about it

contradiction.

He said he was thinking of setting up the lynch, then later, asks me to find somewhere he said he was thinking of setting up the lynch.

Check my last post.

You know what? The whole "The case was now I was thinking it and didn't deny it" bit? I really read that as him saying "I was thinking it."

AT LAST

He admits the mistake. And yet, I am still pessimistic. Are you going to finally drop the BS against Jason?

*whisper* probably not *whisper*

@SpyRex: I wanted to add

If you tl;dr then don't complain about Jason et al not refuting the case and take my word for it that the case against Jason is BS

but I wanted to do that at the

end

of the Wall of Death. Because if this shit keeps coming then my oh-so-poisoned brain will have a renewed determination to meticulously analyze and explain

every single one

of Jason's posts (and Nintendo et al's rebuttals) for the further 10 pages and on.

[SpyreX]

Psshhh on cases.

I've got a right hook what else do I need?

Of team drool (jason, marco, nintendo, ender) as it sits I'll make them turn into vapor ender,marco.....jason...........nintendo.

[nintendoaddict1]

He admits the mistake. And yet, I am still pessimistic. Are you going to finally drop the BS against Jason?

*whisper* probably not *whisper*

I'll drop it, but I've still got my eye on him.

And that wasn't really funny.

[Rhinox]

If its quotes and doesn't fit on my screen I'm not reading it, fyi.

I'll go out on a limb and say nintendo is still town because call it a hunch that fits with the mess that is this page.

Shadow's posts were the most worthwhile and entertaining thing I've read in 15 pages.

[SpyreX]

I dont doubt that.

However, we have to put a stop to quote madness somewhere.

Here is somewhere.

SAY NO TO QUOTES

[ShadowGuru]

I dont doubt that.

However, we have to put a stop to quote madness somewhere.

Here is somewhere.

SAY NO TO QUOTES

Sorry if it seemed like overkill, man. I was just tired of his disingenuous assertions.

[Toogeloo]

If it's of any consequence, I think both Jason and Nintendo are town. Not like I haven't seen the "lying gambit" before as well. Reck's hosted WoW game had a liar that was town on Day 1, who gambited against another town by lying.

I am more concerned with the players who are coming in and making jabs at the top suspects while allowing the more vocal players to push the lynches.

So who are those players then?

GhostWriter is my number one gut atm. My town read from earlier on Sathoris is disappearing as well as he just pops in from time to time. You actually haven't done much to make my image of you appear anything townie. Reck still trollin' but I've lost interest in him. Ghost or you (Rhinox) I would be fine with lynching at this very moment, with Sathoris starting to make my eyebrow raise. Good 'nuff?

[Ghostlin]

Vote: Nintendo

Yeah, four pages of nothing really compelling brought this on. There's really not much point in prolonging the lynch.

[Silent Wraith]

Vote: Nintendo

Yeah, four pages of nothing really compelling brought this on. There's really not much point in prolonging the lynch.

Wrong post. Posting in hydra now.

Vote: Nintendo.

Four pages of nothing really compelling brought this on. He's either a horribad VI for trying to push the most convulted lynch I've ever seen, or he's scum.

Either way, the debate no longer needs to go on.

~Out-of-Hydra quote added for Handy Dandy Iso purposes. Let me know if I miss any of these, folks.

[xRECKONERx]

DAT SCUM FUELED WAGON

[Hiraki]

Ender or Nintendo?

[jasonT1981]

To answer an earlier question.

When you said you had played with Hiraki before, Nintendo and you saw him as town because of those games (or something along those lines) I thought it would be a good opertunity to see if Hiraki was playing the same as he was in both those games. That was my origional plan HOWEVER after you linked them and I saw you were scum I wanted you to give your town reads and compare them to your town reads as scum and see if you declared them town.

However, you gave up two scum buddies and only one as town, so my theory was out the window on getting that meta from you.

[Sathoris]

DAT SCUM FUELED WAGON

Join the scum fueled wagon for a good lynch for both sides.

[SpyreX]

Join the scum fueled wagon for a good lynch for both sides.

Que?