iama:
iamausername wrote:Emp, just because C-Worl called it the 'catch of the game' doesn't mean it actually was. You appear to have completely ignored a major point of card 7; it was not the catch of the game, it was a fairly obviously flawed argument.
Just because *you* say that 2 months later doesn't mean that *Rhinox* didn't see it as damning at the time. You appear to have completely ignored the actual context in trying to make your card 7; Rhinox himself said "That actually is a good catch." So he obviously didn't think that the rest of the players would see it as a flawed argument.
iamausername wrote:EmpTyger wrote:Not C-Worl or iama- not after they said that about the catch.
I said no such thing, and even if I had, Rhinox voting ThAd that close to deadline would have forced us into a situation where the only options were ThAd or No Lynch, a situation in which any sensible town player would hammer ThAd, regardless of their opinions.
This isn't even close to what happened.
First of all, despite your vague "sensible town player", there's still (as I just showed) no viable 5th voter that doesn't leave Rhinox worse off. Again, I don't care what you are trying to insist now about yourself, without any evidence. I'm talking about from *Rhinox*'s point-of-view at the time. From his perspective, there's not a single shred of evidence for him to think there's any chance of you suddenly abandoning a still-viable Archaist lynch to follow him to ThAd. Not after your attacks against Archaist, not after your [249], not after stating that Archaist's partner by process-of-elimination was either Rhinox or me, not after even just repeating how you had "declared C-worl and ThAd to be town".
And there isn't a shred of evidence for Rhinox to think that Archaist wouldn't be considered a viable lynch without Rhinox's vote. Archaist is at lynch-2 and there are 4 players (sAb, Fishy, MK, and myself) yet to post after your [249] and C-Worl declaring it the "catch of the game". All it takes is one of us to agree and Archaist is at lynch-1, and there's no reason why any of us would think it an "obviously flawed argument".
[Also, you're tripping up over yourself in your contorted effort to justify this case against ThAd. You just rebutted your own card 5, because if you were making "obviously flawed arguments" while C-Worl was doing the actual browbeating by calling it the "catch of the game", that kind of contradicts your point argument that there's no reason to nightkill C-Worl over you. Honestly, your recent revisionistly historical posts are doing a great job of further undermining card 4.]
I'd dare you to point to a single piece of evidence to support this fanciful interpretation of Rhinox's gamestate at the end of D1.
But after dawdling around while Fishy squandered our extra chances until it was too late to do anything about it D2, you dawdled around until it was too late for discussion D3.
iamausername wrote:VOTE: No Lynch
At this point I feel like it may have some benefit.
No, at this point you left us no other option.
