Scorn wrote:ThreeIsFrench wrote:Vifam wrote:*vifams reads*
UNVOTE: VOTE: vifam Scum like to keep options open; you really think all those people are scum? plus the people you didnt mention are presumably null.
~hip
Yeah, maybe I went a little overboard with my reads there. I should mull over them so more :X
At first I thought 3IF was overreacting a bit, then I saw that Vifam was so easily swayed by 3IF's opinion. A town would stick to their guns and not change their mind due to a simple statement such as this.
Pappums Leather Jacket wrote:...
We will unvote, vote Chevre. Enters, and makes a completely random vote, totally ignoring the somewhat more relevant vezok stuff that was already happening, then unvotes without coming up with a new one, and makes a comment about the nameclaim stuff that was already resolved. We're not seeing any pressing scumhunting motivation from that slot. Unvote, vote: Chevre.
...
I ignored because, really, what else was there to say? vezok's idea was a bad one, and plenty of people had already said that. As for the last part of this excerpt of your post, I'll be honest: I didn't have any motivation. When I read those first five pages and saw such a mess, I didn't want to come back and try to sift through it. This isn't a town or scum tell, it's a human being tell.
MagnaOfIllusion wrote:...
The point of the Vezok wagon wasn’t to pressure Vezok. You understand that, right?
It was to gauge the reaction of other players based on how they react to said wagon.
...
Rereading this, it doesn't make sense from an individual standpoint. A wagon must consist of multiple players in this game, so the point couldn't have totally collectively been to gauge the reaction of other players, unless you're all some sort of hive mind.
Zinger2099 wrote:You know that guy you see going into the convenience store when you stop off at that little town on the way to grandma's house? A sort of shifty looking fella who buys a pack of smokes, a couple of lotto scratchers and a tall boy at ten in the morning? The kind of guy you wait for to come out before you and your family go in? Well, that guy is me. My name is Earl. And if you took the time to really get to know me, find out what kind of person I truly am instead of just stereotyping me because of the way I look, well, you'd be wasting your time, because I'm exactly who you think I am. Hell, I'll pretty much steal anything that isn't nailed down.
I'm really truly surprised more people aren't noticing this. I mean, yeah, he foolishly claimed, but the paragraph of claiming reads more like an anti-town role.
IRRELEVANT: All the talk of "blatant sheeping" made me think "bleatant sheeping," and I chuckled a little.
Pinky and the Brain wrote:Not wanting to headclaim is about as anti-town as it gets.
Agreed. Personally, I think hydras are unfair and I really don't see the point in them anyway.
killerjester wrote:...
Townies have an incentive to read every single post in a game, as every post brings them close to their goal of lynching all anti-town. Mafia will often skim the posts and only look for subjects they can bring the town's attention to. The joke was fine. I found the fact that he didn't respond to the question more scummy than anything else, as I feel a townie wouldn't have missed a question directly pointed at them.
...
I cannot personally hold this as true. A true townie, whose life was somehow threatened, would definitely read all posts; however, as we are human beings on a site where our life is not threatened and our win/loss record doesn't even matter that much, tend to skim every once in a while out of sheer laziness.
Pappums Leather Jacket wrote:1. I have never, ever, ever seen a townie label their vote as being in RVS. Have you ever done this before? Have you even seen other townies do this before?
(this is so not in the right spot in chronological order; It is originally from Post #106)
But yeah, I think tons of people have done it. Starting with something like
Random vote:
I think it's also a generalization to mentally label a vote as RVS if the reason is ludicrous, such as characters in the username or past experiences.
Pappums Leather Jacket in 216 (his spiel on the correct definition of policy lynch): That may have been the definition of ago, but it's perfectly reasonable for a society to morph and mold the definition as time passes. It now predominantly means what killerjester defined it as.
Oh, and while I'm speaking to you: Could you tag your posts with who is posting at the time? I can usually differentiate, but I want to be entirely sure.
Nero Cain wrote:...
I disagree with this. Yes I think it fairly obstinate to refuse a head claim but I've been in 2 games where the hydra was asked to claim and both refused. In one game the hydra flipped scum; in the other they flipped town. So I see ZeL's refusal null.
...
This isn't exactly why we want the heads to claim. You are saying that a hydra claiming or not claiming heads has no impact on it's role, this is true. However, we are wanting them to claim so that one can use meta to reference past games if they so wish.
killerjester wrote:Leonshade wrote:I don't like Vifam trying to deflect the suspicion on him onto someone else, but I'm going to keep my vote on the Jilynne slot for now. Vifam has enough votes on him at the moment, and I want to keep a close eye on whoever will replace Jil.
Attempt to distance yourself from the bandwagon, noted.
VOTE: Leonshade
I agree with this a whole bunch, considering that Leonshade still wanted to stay on the other wagon even after Jilynne had announced her need to be replaced in the thread.
ZeL1nK wrote:...
Zinger wrote:ZeL1nK claimed he would kill me Night 1 before I had said ANYTHING in this game what-so-ever.
Ah, nope.
You'd posted in this thread when I said that.
Zinger wrote:Also, unvote.
That's it?
Still, that's what fueled you to want to vig him? It doesn't really add up.
So I did a search on Vifam. This appears to be the only game he wanted to replace out of. Also, he did it by PMing the mod and made no public announcement in the thread.
Here is what I think about Meransiel. She states that she doesn't care about Day 1, yet she obviously checking the thread for reactions, otherwise she wouldn't be making replies so hastily. Therefore, some part of her mentality is invested in this game, more than she wants to believe.
Vote: Meransiel
, with my other suspects being Leonshade and Junpei/Vifam.
Nero Cain wrote:You're totally right. He is. The only thing I can say is that I continue to see Chevre read the thread but not post. But thank you for pointing out Pine's lurking.
You are lying. I've only looked in this thread once. I've already stated that I was demotivated by the first 5 pages. But now I'm glad I finally returned, this is a very enchanting game.