Thadmiral wrote:
unvote
vote: junpei
And the tracker claim?
Zinger wrote:
I am a jailkeeper. Which means I also protect my targets, but I guess that's not something worth considering for you guys.
Your motive is not to protect, though. Your motive is to target a specific player.
And that's assuming you are telling the whole truth about your role
Zinger wrote:
I've noticed the majority of players on this website are overconfident and arrogant and rude. I much prefer the other website I play on. The playerbase here sucks.
But alas, you do have a higher activity rate here. It's a shame really.
By the way, I've been lying to you all. I'm actually the town doctor.
Except I'm not, that was a lie. Or was it?
Your mom said hi.
BS. Town doc does not claim third-party JK.
If anything, this is only makes me think it more reasonable to lynch you, since if you are willing to lie we clearly can't trust you. (Also, I think it's arguable that if you are willing to lie to us to advance your win condition, then you are, in the most literal sense, anti-town)
Silver wrote:
3. REPLACE OUTS ARE A NULL TELL. Sometimes it could be OH SHIT I'M SCUM AND ABOUT TO LOSE, REPLACE ME. Sometimes it could be OH SHIT I HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF STUFF IN REAL LIFE, REPLACE ME. Sometimes it could be I HATE THESE PLAYERS, REPLACE ME. There's no way for you to tell the motivation in any such act and thus it's a null tell and for you to suggest any other motivation from it is scummy in and of itself. Also lurker hunting? I said I was V/LA til friday or whichever day and you guys posted lots... so... obviously i gotta catch up.
Neither side of this argument is correct (this isn't just a theory rant, I promise
)
Replacing out is ordinarily a null tell - even if it is a player replacing out under extreme pressure. Why? Because plenty of people don't like to lose. It's only a scumtell if the individual has a particular propensity for replacing out under pressure
as scum
Zinger wrote: I did not claim an anti-town third party role. You are distorting the facts.
You've claimed a highly improbable third party role which, on numbers alone, is likely to permanently disable a town power-role. Add to that the facts that you have already been willing to lie to advance your win condition, that you have no personal interest in catching scum (your sole motive during day phase is to not lynch people who you think has your item), and that I am far from convinced that you are being completely honest, and there is good reason for thinking that your role is anti-town.
Unvote, vote: Zinger
Zinger wrote:
This is what I am talking about. Look at the arrogance in this statement.
You should trust your mod to do his job and shouldn't tell him how you think it should be done.
All these requests for other players to be replaced, what right do you have to demand someone else be forcibly removed from the game? None.
Actually, any player has the right to request the replacement of another player when that player is, to use the technical term, "being a dick". In your case, I can only presume that you've become embarrassed/upset by the fact that your fail-claim has been poorly received and so now you are lashing out against the players in this game, and the site in general, when the real problem is just that you've done a terrible job playing your role.
Silver wrote:
3. You are either an arrogant idiot or you know exactly why he requested replacement which you wouldn't know unless you have inside knowledge. Everyone please note this as evidence of bussing or cheating or more than likely arrogance
How is it evidence of bussing? Attacking somebody for replacing out is common. I don't agree with it, but it is hardly evidence of bussing - let alone cheating.
Zinger wrote:
I'm just a standard town Jailkeeper. It was all a fakeclaim. You can lynch me for lying now.
^needs to die
