charter, while addressing me, wrote:If Psyche winds up being town, suspicion that weak is going to look very bad for you.
I am aware of this. However:
charter wrote:On day one, a lynch on ANYONE is better than a no lynch. Even if you lynch the most awesomist powerrole, it's much better than a no lynch.
+1
This is my point of view as well and based on the options available and Panacea/Psyche's actions, I am fine with my current choice.
Further:
charter wrote:Really have no idea why I didn't do that six hours ago, but... there you have it, what Charter actually thinks of this game. Phoebus and Pappums for scum....
Should I take that you're basing this on my first quote of you in this post?
If you aren't and you have said something more substantial... I've totally missed it. And believe me... I looked.
Psyche wrote:Phoebus really misrepped me there. My statistics spiel was more weak thinking than "disingenuous". What makes it disingenuous?
Even more inaccurate is claiming that all I've done to defend my behavior is call people stupid. I'm pretty sure I've done at least a little more than that. A little.
I concede on one and a half points here.
Calling your statistics "disingenuous" was inaccurate. One cannot determine disingenuousness without determining intent. And even then, it may simply be weak thinking, like you said. However, your predecessor rubbed me the wrong way. Your beginning with statistics and back-pedalling so quickly, combined with how you fingered your predecessor as being potentially scummy -- all contribute to me being happy with my vote.
The half a point I concede is the second one... Yes.. maybe you've done a little more than call people stupid. However, none of it makes me want to change my mind.
*shrug*
Your happiness is intertwined with your outlook on life.