Execution Mafia: Days of the Cold War GAMEOVER


User avatar
Codfish
Codfish
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Codfish
Townie
Townie
Posts: 17
Joined: June 22, 2011

Post Post #75 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:34 am

Post by Codfish »

CC, How can Quil be town if vezok and I are scum?
Quil is the only one playing buddy buddy here; it's to vezok and not to me. You even said yourself that vezok contradicted. So then, what is Quil, the defender of the scum? Not scum?
"My name is Quoth," said the raven.
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #76 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:34 am

Post by Quilford »

Codfish wrote:@Quil, your false premise is that I flipped _with_ SK and therefore I'm budding him. Your entire argument is based on this.

How does that 'false premise' have anything to do with Post #55, in which I don't even mention buddying?


Codfish wrote:Now that we're on cyclical reasoning, explain to me how "vezok is town" ==> "I'm town and I agree" ==>
"You're scum because you don't"
==> ":. Vezok is town" is NOT the most cyclical crap we can see?

I actually fail to see how that makes any sense at all, or how I have implied the bolded at all.


Codfish wrote:1/2 don't contradict since enough time passed between them; you've disregarded the fact that vezok slipped in between those posts.

7 minutes and 0 vezok posts were between quotes 1 and 2.



Codfish wrote:The rest are you trying to pull straws. I made a statement and gave the other side of the coin. 3/4 5/6 are the same thing; I made a statement of two options and went for that which is most secure.

In 3 you imply that I'm trying to gain favour with vezok because I'm scum and he's town, in 4 you imply that you think we're both scum.

In 5 you state that you'd be repeating SK when he says there's "a chance" I'm trying to gain favour with vezok, in 6 you say "A removal of incompetence is more secure."
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #77 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:36 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

SleepyKrew wrote:So vezok's contradiction is fine but Cod is scum? burnitwithfiardiequildie

Hey Quil.
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #78 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:39 am

Post by Quilford »

SleepyKrew wrote:So vezok's contradiction is fine but Cod is scum? burnitwithfiardiequildie

FOR FUCK'S SAKE

WOULD YOU KINDLY GO BURN TO DEATH IN A FUCKING FIRE

I POINTED OUT SEVERAL TIMES THAT I THOUGHT VEZOK'S CONTRADICTION WAS NOT AS SCUMMY AS YOU MADE IT OUT TO BE. I THEN POINTED OUT THREE CONTRADICTIONS THAT CODFISH MADE. YOU'RE ESSENTIALLY SAYING THAT ALL CONTRADICTIONS ARE THE SAME TO YOU

YOU'RE NOT EVEN FUCKING READING MY POSTS

FUCK

YOU



Codfish wrote:Define opportunistic scum.

opportunistic scum
n.
Codfish

IE READ MY FUCKING POSTS AS TO WHY I PERCEIVE YOU AS OPPORTUNISTIC



Codfish wrote:^ Sigh, should start every post with this.


Codfish wrote:^ Sigh, should start every post with this.


Codfish wrote:^ Sigh, should start every post with this.


Codfish wrote:^ Sigh, should start every post with this.


Codfish wrote:^ Sigh, should start every post with this.


Codfish wrote:^ Sigh, should start every post with this.


Codfish wrote:^ Sigh, should start every post with this.

THIS IS FUCKING BUDDYING RIGHT HERE



Quilford wrote:
vezokpiraka wrote:
vote Moi


I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

vezokpiraka wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.



Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

So the 'case' on vezok seems to be that these two posts are a contradiction. They are, sure, but I don't see how this contradiction makes him scummy. I regard the former post as a bit of hyperbole, in the way you would say 'Obama is the only suitable candidate for the Presidential Election', or something like that.


Quilford wrote:
vezokpiraka wrote:
vote Moi


I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

vezokpiraka wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.



Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

So the 'case' on vezok seems to be that these two posts are a contradiction. They are, sure, but I don't see how this contradiction makes him scummy. I regard the former post as a bit of hyperbole, in the way you would say 'Obama is the only suitable candidate for the Presidential Election', or something like that.


Quilford wrote:
vezokpiraka wrote:
vote Moi


I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

vezokpiraka wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.



Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

So the 'case' on vezok seems to be that these two posts are a contradiction. They are, sure, but I don't see how this contradiction makes him scummy. I regard the former post as a bit of hyperbole, in the way you would say 'Obama is the only suitable candidate for the Presidential Election', or something like that.


Quilford wrote:
vezokpiraka wrote:
vote Moi


I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

vezokpiraka wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.



Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

So the 'case' on vezok seems to be that these two posts are a contradiction. They are, sure, but I don't see how this contradiction makes him scummy. I regard the former post as a bit of hyperbole, in the way you would say 'Obama is the only suitable candidate for the Presidential Election', or something like that.


Quilford wrote:
vezokpiraka wrote:
vote Moi


I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

vezokpiraka wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.



Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

So the 'case' on vezok seems to be that these two posts are a contradiction. They are, sure, but I don't see how this contradiction makes him scummy. I regard the former post as a bit of hyperbole, in the way you would say 'Obama is the only suitable candidate for the Presidential Election', or something like that.

THIS IS WHY VEZOK'S CONTRADICTION DOES NOT COME FROM SCUM
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #79 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:39 am

Post by Quilford »

SleepyKrew wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:So vezok's contradiction is fine but Cod is scum? burnitwithfiardiequildie

Hey Quil.

HEY FUCK YOU TOO
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #80 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:40 am

Post by Quilford »

I'm outta here for now. You two go book a hotel room and take your shit there.
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #81 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:41 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

You're only allowed to capsrage if you're right.
*Entering 'ignore Quilford until he actually does something' mode*
Completed.
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #82 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:41 am

Post by Quilford »

Quilford wrote:
Codfish wrote:1/2 don't contradict since enough time passed between them; you've disregarded the fact that vezok slipped in between those posts.

7 minutes and 0 vezok posts were between quotes 1 and 2.

I MADE IT LARGER SO YOU CAN READ IT
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #83 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:42 am

Post by Quilford »

SleepyKrew wrote:You're only allowed to capsrage if you're right.
*Entering 'ignore Quilford until he actually does something' mode*
Completed.

AND AGAIN YOU DON'T ACTUALLY BOTHER TO READ MY POSTS
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #84 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:44 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

Let's change it up a bit.
Why is vezok town?
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #85 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:46 am

Post by Quilford »

Quilford wrote:
Quilford wrote:
Codfish wrote:1/2 don't contradict since enough time passed between them; you've disregarded the fact that vezok slipped in between those posts.

7 minutes and 0 vezok posts were between quotes 1 and 2.

I MADE IT LARGER SO YOU CAN READ IT

THIS IS A LIE

THIS IS A FUCKING LIE FROM CODFISH

VOTE ME SO I CAN KILL HIM

PLEASE PLEASE PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE

I DON'T KNOW WHETHER VEZOK IS TOWN OR NOT

I DO KNOW THAT YOUR REASONING FOR THINKING HE IS SCUM IS
FUCKING SHITTY
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #86 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

If you don't think vezok is town, then why are you electing him, defending him, and calling him town?
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:51 am

Post by Quilford »

Can we selfvote? If no, Vezok is the only person out of everyone who's posted so far where I think my vote will do best. Hence why it's there
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:51 am

Post by Quilford »

VOTE: Quilford in case we can selfvote
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:52 am

Post by Quilford »

EBWOP: In #79, 'YOU' in line 2 should've been italicised.
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:55 am

Post by Quilford »

Why are
you
turning a blind eye to Codfish?
User avatar
jasonT1981
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9671
Joined: June 15, 2009
Location: Mourne Mountains

Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:59 am

Post by jasonT1981 »

been looking at this on a quick glance read through, more thoughts late when I get back home and on a proper computer

.However Quilford, calm down please and loose the attitude/swearing/caps.
I will not be voting Vezo for Executioner. That is not someone I want with that sort of power.

Vezo can come across as a VI sometimes (sorry Vezo, its true) and would make snap decisions I feel on his own and not on the willing of town. Executioner in the hands of Vezo is not something town wants.

Quilford seems to be wanting it just to kill one person, that is not town. Begging for the role just so you can kill someone? this is my first time in a game like this, but to me it seems to work a lot like Kingmaker only we all vote instead of one person picking the king.
However the executioner/king should always be listening to the town and making decissions based on that. Quilford is seemingly not wanting to do that.

The reason I am holding off my vote right now is so everyone can check in and make posts. I have a fair idea who I would pick (or at least, who I think would be best for this role) but not going to rush into my vote

Quilford, if you don't know if Vezo is town, then why are you voting him for executioner? does not make sense.

More later when I get time to read through properly, bit of a busy day this afternoon.
User avatar
jasonT1981
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9671
Joined: June 15, 2009
Location: Mourne Mountains

Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:00 am

Post by jasonT1981 »

Quilford wrote:Can we selfvote? If no, Vezok is the only person out of everyone who's posted so far where I think my vote will do best. Hence why it's there


what is it about Vezo that makes you think that is where your vote will do best, and why do you think it will do best on someone you do not even know is town (your own words)

Really not liking quilford right now.
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:12 am

Post by Quilford »

I don't know he's town, but with scum like Codfish attacking him this early on he must be.

jasonT1981 wrote:However Quilford, calm down please and loose the attitude/swearing/caps.

Deal with it. If you don't like it you can replace out.


jasonT1981 wrote:Quilford seems to be wanting it just to kill one person, that is not town. Begging for the role just so you can kill someone?

I'm sorry, what the fuck are you on? Do you know what lynching is? This is like lynching, except instead of piling our votes on the person we want to kill, we pile our votes on the person we want to kill someone. We won't vote that person if we think the person isn't going to kill the right person.


jasonT1981 wrote:However the executioner/king should always be listening to the town and making decissions based on that. Quilford is seemingly not wanting to do that.

How have I not wanted to listen to the town.


jasonT1981 wrote:Quilford, if you don't know if Vezo is town, then why are you voting him for executioner? does not make sense.

I don't know he's town. Do you know that who you want to vote is town?


You're also not commenting on anyone else who has posted so far. You are not commenting on why my points are wrong; you're not commenting on why SK's or Codfish's points are right. You're not giving your thoughts on Codfish blatantly lying; you're focusing on me because of an attitude you perceive me to have.

You can go in my scum list, too.
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:14 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

jasonT1981 wrote:I have a fair idea who I would pick (or at least, who I think would be best for this role) but not going to rush into my vote

Who?
Also, your post has no mention of Cod, CC, or myself. Are we all null?
Quil, I'm not ignoring your case on Cod, I'm simply not responding to it because it would just fuel the fiar.

PEDIT: Quil dies today.
Quil, in your first post, you call vezok town. Explain.
To be clear: quack
User avatar
vezokpiraka
vezokpiraka
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
vezokpiraka
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6034
Joined: June 17, 2010

Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:14 am

Post by vezokpiraka »

Captain Corporal wrote:@Quil
The two posts have been specified before, I believe. The is a blatand contridiction between Vezok saying he is open-minded, and him saying that he only wants him to be executioner. That doesn't sound very open-minded to me.

@SK -
Oops, case, not bandwagon. In the other game you twisted information, but as I said, your suspicions are well founded.

=( Lol, I guess in the game type there's no random voting. I miss my random vote.

Also, I think I might be away all tommorow (birthday : D). In case I don't post again tonight, my town read is SK, my null read is Quil (leaning town now), and my scum reads are Vezok and Cod.

WTasfdbgbre?fa???BlergABLingDerp

Where the fuck did I say I am open minded? I said that I will vote me and MoI for executioner and nobody else unless I see something really townie coming from someone. Right now none of you are pretty townie.

@Quilford: WTF? You vote me. You say I am twn (IN YOUR FIRST POST) and now you unvote me say I'm not town and vote yourself?

Seriously what is wrong in this game?
Windows hasn't detected any keyboard. Press Enter.
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:16 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

Quil's avatar is going to lose space pretty soon ~
To be clear: quack
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:16 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

*run out of
To be clear: quack
User avatar
Quilford
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Quilford
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8438
Joined: March 11, 2011

Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:18 am

Post by Quilford »

SleepyKrew wrote:PEDIT: Quil dies today.
Quil, in your first post, you call vezok town. Explain.

I did not call vezok town.

I said that this
vezokpiraka wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:And why not? Is he your scumbuddy?

Yep. That's right. You caught us oh mighty SK.

was a town post.

Are you really going to lynch me for lying when Codfish said that his read on vezok changed
1) because vezok had posted between the updated and prior read WHEN HE HADN'T
2) because he had had sufficient time to think about it WHEN THERE WAS 7 MINUTES BETWEEN THE TWO POSTS, WHICH ARE DIRECTLY AFTER EACH OTHER IN ISOLATION


I'm waiting for some sense to be dragged into this game.
User avatar
SleepyKrew
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
User avatar
User avatar
SleepyKrew
he/him
Snark Attack
Snark Attack
Posts: 15746
Joined: April 27, 2011
Pronoun: he/him
Location: quack

Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:19 am

Post by SleepyKrew »

You admit to lying, cool.
Cod can wait, he's in no way clear. But you die today.
To be clear: quack

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”