Open 320- Tit for Tat: Game Over!

verydark · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:20 am

What was so scummy about 309 exactly?

Sleepy/Lady = Scum.

Let's remember how rapidly Lady pushed for a VE lynch, and was wrong. She's trying to rush the game again, if you're so fucking impatient, why don't you just, I don't know, not play mafia and go watch MTV or something more flashy to keep your attention.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:20 am

Less ad hom more useful.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:21 am

verydark wrote:What was so scummy about 309 exactly?

Sleepy/Lady = Scum.

Let's remember how rapidly Lady pushed for a VE lynch, and was wrong. She's trying to rush the game again, if you're so fucking impatient, why don't you just, I don't know, not play mafia and go watch MTV or something more flashy to keep your attention.

So I'm scum... because I push for lynches.

Welp.

Here, let me show you why YOU are scum.

Magua · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:21 am

Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Did you even read 309?

Yes.

I read 309 as a newbie who, lacking concrete ideas of what scum might actually be doing, is looking back and making a case on behavior he finds suspicious.

Now, the case is crap, but the intent seems real, and verydark hasn't exactly been tunneling SK or anything like that.

I'm honestly not seeing the scumminess that you're attributing to 309. The worst I can get out of it is "Explain your vote" directed at SK and no one else.

Lady Lambdadelta wrote:and Magua? If Verydark flips scum, SleepyKrew is town and Sigma is scum.

Verydark scum -> Sigma scum

but Sigmascum =/= Verydark scum

See what I'm drawing?

That we should be lynching Sigma. =P

verydark · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:23 am

I would like to see you redraw your little scum map with me as a town possibility, because you're going to need that backup plan.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:24 am

verydark wrote:
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
Unvote; Vote: SleepyKrew

I don't want to see a page 13 today. He dies in the next 3 pages.

Nope.

Although, after re-reading D1, I noticed that SleepyKrew replaced GenericName, who had no worthy posts. He never gave his rationale for keeping his vote on Viscera. The only post pre-lynch was this:

SleepyKrew wrote:Also, you should vote VE.

This seems very opportunistic. Also, the majority of his posts are one line in length, dismissive, and never explains his actions.

VOTE: SleepyKrew

I want an explanation of why you voted for VE.

In this post, you discredit my vote on SleepyKrew, then promptly vote SleepyKrew.

You're chastising me for pushing SleepyKrew too fast...and yet you ALSO believe SleepyKrew to be scum.

Why is this? If you feel SleepyKrew and I are both scum, why would you have a problem with my apparent speed bus?

It doesn't add up. This is why you are scum. You are trying to use twisted logic to now achieve not only a lynch on Sleepy, but also a mislynch on me.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:24 am

SleepyKrew wrote:What's wrong with 317?

Magua · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:25 am

SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: verydark
Just a note, LYLO tomorrow if we mislynch.

IIoA -- you should be explaining your vote on verydark, but instead you're posting a fact that isn't even relevant to the vote.

StefanB · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:26 am

MoI: While I think that are good explanations for day 1, is there any explenation for not voting day 2 for him?
I think it's time to get a little more content from him.
Okay at the time of the post 4 people were not voting.
Seraphim get a sort of pass because he wasn't there on day one.
MoI: You have voted on this day and were active enough.
That left Verydark and Sigma.
I wanted to applie a little pressure and I thought it would help more on Sigma.
I think we need a lot more from him. I know where he stood on dead people.(kind of) I have no clue where he stands on any player now.
He defended VeryDark and Seraphim before, but not enough to be sure, if he thinks there are town.
So I have somethink on Sigma. The more I think about the more I realise how not playing he is.
I don't want to go with that Sigma (and Seraphim) read to Lyo btw.
Ninjad:

Your fast joing the waggon. You stated in your ISO, that you suspected VeryDark, the why I didn't find. You had that read for quite some time, can you explain it a bit.

Ninjad again:
A very bad case, about somethink that doesn't seem to relevant for me. So he is diging out really old stuff. Yes it is scummy to not look at Sleepys day 2 (much more post and more meat) but one question what information would it give you if Verydark flipped town. (Just posibilitys if he flipps scum, good for us but can we minimise the bad if not, even if you think that's a very low posibility)

Verydark: We have to accept a mislynch as a posibility. We will probably never sure and even then we can make a mistake.
Please don't attack somethink so farfatched, give us more.

Ninjad the 3rd and 4th:
So I just post that think!
I think about Verydark scum later.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:26 am

Magua wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: verydark
Just a note, LYLO tomorrow if we mislynch.

IIoA -- you should be explaining your vote on verydark, but instead you're posting a fact that isn't even relevant to the vote.

... the hell?

This isn't IIOA.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:27 am

Magua wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: verydark
Just a note, LYLO tomorrow if we mislynch.

IIoA -- you should be explaining your vote on verydark, but instead you're posting a fact that isn't even relevant to the vote.

I've already said I'm down for dark/malp/Sigma/possibly Seraphim if he continues to be scummy.

verydark · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:30 am

SleepyKrew wrote:
I've already said I'm down for dark/malp/Sigma/possibly Seraphim if he continues to be scummy.

Wow, so basically everyone except yourself and Lady?

Interesting.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:31 am

verydark wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:
I've already said I'm down for dark/malp/Sigma/possibly Seraphim if he continues to be scummy.

Wow, so basically everyone except yourself and Lady?

Interesting.

...

Blatant Misrepresentation.

Do you see Moai? Magua?

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:34 am

Sleepy wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: verydark
Just a note, LYLO tomorrow if we mislynch.

Wow, I’ve never seen more compact wagon distancing than this ever. You join the alternative wagon to your own and simultaneously make an off-hand comment that tomorrow is LYLO if it is wrong?

--

Magua wrote:Better idea: You follow *me* and vote Sigma. I've seen nothing out of that slot except negative shoot-downs combined with a disturbing lack of positions.

At this stage given play I would not object to a Sigma lynch. I do want to see more from both Sigma and Seraphim today.

Do you object to verydark due to a Town read or just what you perceive as more scummy alternatives?

Nevermind, I just saw

328

.

--

verydark wrote:Let's remember how rapidly Lady pushed for a VE lynch, and was wrong. She's trying to rush the game again, if you're so fucking impatient, why don't you just, I don't know, not play mafia and go watch MTV or something more flashy to keep your attention.

So you are saying Town never actively push a lynch that they believe in?

And your obsession with calling anyone who actually votes and scum-hunts impatient is getting old.

What would your solution be? That no-one votes until we get much closer to deadline? What is an acceptable speed of the game for you?

Magua · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:35 am

Lady Lambdadelta wrote:... the hell?

This isn't IIOA.

"If we mislynch it's lylo tomorrow" is exactly IIoA.

SleepyKrew wrote:I've already said I'm down for dark/malp/Sigma/possibly Seraphim if he continues to be scummy.

But you didn't vote verydark until LLD and MoI did, and, as far as I can tell, the only reason you did vote verydark was *because* LLD and MoI did.

Lady Lambadelta wrote:Blatant Misrepresentation.

Do you see Moai? Magua?

Yes, I see.

I'm pondering.

Want to hear what Seraphim has to say, and I want to see what Sigma does.

StefanB · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:38 am

Okay now I have that post out. Was ninjaed 5 times the last time lol.
322 really a stretch, very OMGOS worthy.
330: explains the case beatiful, explain your post VeryDark.
I want to hear Seraphim and Sigmas thoughts, then I wouldn't mind a verydarklynch.
Sory but the last posts were so bad, that it would be nicer to assume VeryDark as scum.

And Ninjaed again:
VeryDark: 9-4 is not 2. 4 is just one more than there are scum in this game.
So I am very near to put you to L-1 VeryDark, very near.

verydark · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:39 am

Do it, then.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:39 am

Yeah, I'm just going to go on the biggest wagon of those 4, which at the moment is verydark. Notice his misrep of me? Cool.

verydark · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:41 am

I'm still curious how I'm misrepping you. You are on board to basically lynch anyone except Lady.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:41 am

...

I'm sorry but #342 makes me want Sleepy dead again.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:41 am

I'm not willing to lynch:
LLD
Magua
MoI
Stefan

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:41 am

verydark wrote:I'm still curious how I'm misrepping you. You are on board to basically lynch anyone except Lady.

And so you are ignoring Moai and Magua completely?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:42 am

WILL PEOPLE EXPLAIN WHY MY POSTS ARE SCUMMY PLEASE

verydark · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:48 am

SleepyKrew wrote:VOTE: malpscap
However you spell it.

SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Magua
Welcome.

SleepyKrew wrote:I'll sheep that.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Seraphim
So Harry Potter lasted 2+ days?

SleepyKrew wrote:lynch it with fire
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Sigma

SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: verydark
Just a note, LYLO tomorrow if we mislynch.

This is why you are scummy.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:48 am

verydark wrote:
SleepyKrew wrote:VOTE: malpscap
However you spell it.

SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Magua
Welcome.

SleepyKrew wrote:I'll sheep that.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Seraphim
So Harry Potter lasted 2+ days?

SleepyKrew wrote:lynch it with fire
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Sigma

SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: verydark
Just a note, LYLO tomorrow if we mislynch.

This is why you are scummy.

...

No really.

...