Nintendo, are you really this stupid? The definition of a neighbourizer is generally a role that allows a player to select someone to have a conversation with throughout the day and the night, he has the ability to add another person into our QT every night though it may also be possible for him to create a separate QT instead of adding them to the existing one, I'm unsure about that. Now Nintendo can you stop acting like a complete moron and actually read my post, following through with a vote on Gorilla might be a good start as well.
Gorilla wrote: Regfan, at that point in the game i didn't feel i could properly articulate a suspicion on any of the 3 players i named, and i'm slow to get started and hate the early game, this is just a fact.
I don't deny that you normally start slow but stating you are suspicious of three players and never mentioning them again in-thread screams of an attempt to create an element of distancing and a lack of any form of scumhunting.
Gorilla wrote: I fucking said in the QT that on a re-read of powerrox my town read of him had faded, did you not see this? I tried to wagon antb instead, but WHOOPS HE WAS ALSO TOWN.
You also said he was stubborn fucking town when you placed your vote on him, you know full well you don't vote a town-read just to compromise lynch, heck Meta-Mafia would teach you that it isn't a good idea especially if the counter-wagon was your strong FoS.
Gorilla wrote: YOU didn't attempt to question people on the wagon, attempt to lead a push or create a lynch elsewhere or attempt to defend or prevent the powerrox lynch, unless you fucking count telling me to get off him in the QT as attempting to prevent the lynch and for that matter if you thought he was just bad town and shouldn't be lynched WHY DIDN'T YOU POST THAT IN THE THREAD?
Asking you to unvote in thread is pointless when I can do so in the neighbourhood quicktopic and I was WAS planning on going into and preventing the Powerrox and even stated so and wanted people to unvote but people fucking blitz lynched before I could get enough time to put it all together which would be obvious if you read the anger and frustration in my posts.
Seraphim wrote: Regfan and gorilla feels like town on town to me but Regfan outing gorilla without warning does not seem like a really great town move. I need to read back, I'm sort of conflicted. I could imagine Regfan being like "YEAH I FOUND SCUM" and not really thinking through it in his rush to confirm his scum read but...outing a neighborizer seems poor.
I did think this through, heck I thought his through for hours and honestly if I don't out this information now and state my scum-read on him it's possible I die tonight and never get a chance to reveal it, Seraphim re-read Gorilla, read his actions in isolation, read his actions in context and then fucking join me please.
Nintendo wrote: Another thing... Regfan, you didn't like the fact that Gorilla was voting one of your scumreads solely because they were one of your scumreads, yet, when he unvotes at your will you have no problem with it?
Think about your question for half a second, obviously I had less issues with him sheeping and voting one of my scum-reads even if his reasoning is it's one of my scum-reads because it increases the chance I get a major suspect lynched however his vote on Powerrox placed him on L-1 thus I asked him to unvote so no one could hammer.
Seraphim wrote:No, I think it's anti-town. You need to look beyond the obvious scumminess of the move and look at his motivation for doing what he did. I think they're both town because their gambit makes no sense from a scum motivation
Alright, you're stating you believe there's no scum-motivation for outing information in this manner but how does that make Gorilla town? Explain to me that.
