bvoigt wrote:I am just a Townie. I think we should do popcorn style, where the person who claims chooses who goes next. I'd like Voided next, please.
ToastyToast wrote:@SRG: My thoughts on bv are the same as my thoughts on him yesterday.
bv and voided are still looking like the scum team to me.
PEDIT: Even with the last post considered
Also, I was only on one wagon where town flipped. WTF u talkin about?
I meant that the wagon on me yesterday had two townies, and you, on it.
ToastyToast wrote:Also, I'm in agreement with SRG that we should sort out our thoughts on each player first b4 massclaiming. The main advantage of a massclaim in a setup like this is that we basically get two confirmed town with results.
I'm not saying wait all day but I want to hear from everyone first. At this point having 2conf town is more valuable then having hidden PR's
Well, they wouldn't be confirmed town. We might have an extra VT, and only one power role.
Aye, that's what i was getting at and of course the scum know at least one of our roles, if they know 2, they could already know there's only 1 claim to come as opposed to two.
shotty wrote:2 of the following (no duplicates possible): (Cop 25%, Doctor 25%, Jailkeeper 25%, Vanilla Townie 25%)
Wow thats a major thing to miss. Sorry!
I'm the Jailkeeper.
N1 I jailed verydark (that was what the Hm.. was about. I thought it was a possibility that verydark could be scum in a very good position, hence would have performed the NK). Given that there was still a NK, my suspicion on him subsided.
N2 I jailed SRG because I was positive scum would try to kill him.
"A train robbery is where you take a train to your destination, make your move, and take a train back, right?"-Isaac
ToastyToast wrote:scum HAS to claim VT. There are only 2 town PR's and claiming such makes them a target.
Not true, because I'm the LAST
VT
. There are 5 VT's, and 4 are dead.
This is why I was so concerned with the amount of VT's, starting as early as Post #395
Firstly there is still a chance that you could both be vt's, isn't there? The fact that me and toast haven't hammered Bv shows we're not a scum team, which means at least one of us are town. Chances are that one of Bv or yourself are scum.
What makes you SO certain about Bv being scum, when now we have only 1 PR claim and 2 more people still left? (Myself and voided). What if there was only 1 PR and me and voided are in wait? He could be scum, I could be scum and if that were the case, knowing Bv was town, i'd happily sit here until the second your vote was either removed or voided came online to hammer with me.
If only for this reason alone, you need to take your vote off of Bv now.
verydark wrote:I forgot that it's 3 to lynch. My bad. UNVOTE: Bvoigt
It's all good, you've at least confirmed that me and Toasty cannot be a scum team, although with his claim i think we knew already that toasty is not scum.
Just to really drive the point home though: ANY vote by a townie prior to all claims and subsequent conversation is not only anti-town but VI play - No matter how sure you are of someones guilt, there is still statistically chance for you to be wrong.
Given how he's wanting to go last, I could agree with you on that, verydark. It doesn't make much sense to hype that you have a surprise for us, and then reveal that you're a VT as well.
2011 scummies winner (BTS help) and participant;
coming back to Mafia...slowly. Keep an eye for me as a mod.
Also keep an eye for setup review requests.
Night 1 - Investigated Toasty. He looked a little suspicious during Day 1 at times, Muffin's tunnelling on him was also bizzarre looking - confirmed town
Night 2 - Investigated BV however it failed, giving me no result.
haha anything involving Bv of course is null <.<
