Cultural Revolution is Over!

Bacde · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:20 pm

I'm going on a trip until Tuesday. Right now I don't support or reject the mlaker wagon. I honestly don't think suggesting no-lynch once is that scummy.

Y · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:53 pm

We know that he's not in Glork's mason group, but is it enough to get him lynched? He wasn't the only one to sugest NL.

I also want this day to be over with, but being irrational isn't the best way to do it...

igota75 · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:43 pm

As with many others, I'd be comfortable hearing a claim from mlaker before throwing the hammer down.

Twomz · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:45 pm

Someone always suggests no lynch for one reason or another... but dag nabbit... it's high time the day ends... soon.

Tamuz · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:10 pm

unvote:CES vote: Fritzler

Fucking imperialists come and take our lands and cultures, burn France, Burn Spain, Burn England! One free China!

Ameliaslay · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:55 pm

I'm not flinching from this lynching: HAMMAH

vote: mlaker

Tamuz · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:00 pm

I still think Fritz is an imperialist

Hop Shui · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:18 pm

mlaker: 7 (VisMaior, Glork, babyJesus, Fritzler, CES, Thok, Ameliaslay)

Cogito Ergo Sum: 5 (LML, mlaker, Pooky, Vaugh, BabyJesus)
Twomz: 4 (chamber, igota75, mystery meat of doom, TSAGod)
Bacde: 4 (Y, Yosarian2, Pug89, SOS).
chamber: 1 (Vaughn).
Glork: 1 (Shamrock)
Y: 1 (Bacde)
Fritzler: 1 (Tamuz)

CES is released as attention turns to mlaker. He is not allowed to wipe the ink from his face.

He is dragged into the streets by an unruly gang of 27 thugs, some leaders, some fearful followers.

His arms are held back, painfully contorted into the jet plane position. A crowd gathers, oblivious to the identity of the victim, and cheers on the attackers, yelling insults.

"Beat him without mercy!"
"Death to the reactionary landlord!"
"Royalist dog!"

mlaker is forced to bark and roll over. His face is smeared with animal feces. One thug strikes his face repeatedly with a belt bearing a heavy brass buckle.

A mumble is faintly heard... "don't you... re... cognize... me..."

His face is bloodshot, swollen and caked ink mixed with excrement. Hungry for gore, and out to prove themselves ruthless against capitalist-roaders, his limp body is kicked around by thugs for nearly an hour after the victim breathed his last breath.

Suddenly a small child pushes his way in the crowd, and with his tiny high-pitched voice, screams in horror:

"What have you done! You have struggled against the Great Helmsman, Mao Zedong!!!"

A deathly silence quickly spreads - no one dares to move, no one dares to breathe.

Mao Zedong has been lynched. He was a Serial Killer.

Everyone off to a sleepless night, more than ever fearing for their future.

The rooster will sing Monday morning 8:00 AM, EST, or after all night choices are in and processed.

Hop Shui · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:08 am

Ameliaslay was awakened in the middle of the night when his house was broken in. Half a dozen thugs, whose voices he recognized as friends of his children, pushed his books off the shelves, and carried them to the back garden.

A great big bonfire was started.

It was fed by precious calligraphy scrolls; watercolors, paintbrushes, and some ancient wood carvings.

After a savage beating, Ameliaslay, who was already skeletal from the stoic and self-sacrificing starvation of letting his family eat the best morsels, was sent to prison, where he later died from either lack of food, torture, dysentery, overwork, or all of the above.

Ameliaslay was Peixuan Li, a

Li family Mason.

PLEASE READ YOUR PMs BEFORE POSTING

With 26 alive, it takes 13 to fatally struggle against an individual! The nail that sticks out gets the hammer!

Thok · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:19 am

Yay! Bring on the post restrictions!

I'm psychiatrist, if you're sk, claim and I'll turn you

Yay!

Fritzler · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:39 am

que?

who do you think sent you that thok? I have a sneaking suspicion i know

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:40 am

unvote, vote: Fritzler

Twomz · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:15 am

Unvote? You were already voting for someone CES?

Thok, you do know that a SK was lynched yesterday, correct? Or was that a posting restriction?

Questions questions questions....

Thok · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:22 am

Twomz wrote:Thok, you do know that a SK was lynched yesterday, correct? Or was that a posting restriction?

Posting restriction, which should be obvious to anybody's who has read Married to the Mob (Normal 43). Fritzler, I don't know who sent it, but there are obvious suspects.

Glork · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:25 am

Unvote Nobody

[/PokingFunAtCES]

Vote: Thok

Something doesn't sit right with me regarding Thok. I'm not at liberty to say what's going on, but I think he's trying to pull one on us right now. No posting restriction thus far has in any way referenced specific roles or abilities, yet he claims that his previous post was restricted.
That said, I'm aware of the SK/Psychiatrist bit Thok was involved in from Married to the Mob, but CA turned out to be scum. I guess I'm still a little confused, so I'd like you to explain the reference a bit more. Are you joking? Are you saying you're scum? Are you legit? What's the deal, yo?
Additionally, his behavior on Day One doesn't please me at all. He voted Chamber without giving any real reasoning (though after I questioned him on it, he said he did it to test reactions... which I don't automatically buy). He also said he'd be willing to Bacdewagon to help end the day, and he just kinda hopped on the Mlaker wagon under the "he's behaved similarly to Chamber" guise. He hasn't sent off any *major* red flags (other than this post restriction thing), IMO, but enough small things to warrant some pressure.

Regarding the Night's actions.... only one death in a game this large is somewhat surprising to me. Now granted, we nailed an SK yesterday (yeah late-day bandwagon changing!) but a single death just seems.... odd... to me. The Cultural Revolution. Considering the flavor of the game, I wouldn't be surprised if there's a cult around here somewhere. Loyalty is easy to buy, be aware of traitors. There isn't yet any hard evidence of a cult, obviously, but I think we would all do well to be cautious (paranoid, even) of such possibilities.

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:28 am

Twomz wrote: Unvote? You were already voting for someone CES?

Meh, it's just a habit.

And Glork, Thok was forced to say that line. Obv. It's not really a posting restriction.

Now join the Fritzler-wagon. I command you!

Tamuz · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:31 am

vote: Fritzler

Die Imperialist

Fritzler · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:23 am

Thok wrote:
Twomz wrote:Thok, you do know that a SK was lynched yesterday, correct? Or was that a posting restriction?
Posting restriction, which should be obvious to anybody's who has read Married to the Mob (Normal 43). Fritzler, I don't know who sent it, but there are obvious suspects.

COMO ESTAS, BITCHES?

Vote: Thok

Vaughn · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:26 am

vote: Glork

His post seems so scummy, fishing he is.

Tamuz · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:32 am

Would somebody else make the damn EUROPEAN LANGAUGE to CHINESE HISTORY connection?

Glork · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:33 am

Vaughn wrote:
vote: Glork

His post seems so scummy, fishing he is.

Yeah, masonvoting is tech.

Y · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:52 am

One kill and a dead SK.

[quote="Hop Shui"]Half a dozen thugs[/quote]
Does that say we have six mafiosos? If so, is it possible to have any other killing group? How probable is that we also have a clan?

Thok's posting restriction was sent to him after mlaker got killed, so I guess we have at least another SK.

So, what do we have?
Killing group 1: Yes. Apparently six mafiosos.
Killing group 2: Possible.
SK 1: Killed.
SK 2: Possible.
Clan: Possible.

Thoughts?

Vaughn · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:54 am

MAN! Am I this far behind in my games? I've seen to forgotten people's claims... and what happened in each game.

I'm going to do a massive re-read later on, for the time-being, I apologize for my recent activity.

unvote

Limited Access For This Week

Tamuz · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:55 am

Y, as far as the clan goes... we have the Li family mason goes, which leads me to believe we may have another mason group out there, but to your questions, if we have a potential 3 living killing groups, why do we only have one death?

I doubt the existance of multiple killing groups, but I would lean to there being a large mafia and TCTs, sadly enough.

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:00 am

Tamuz wrote: we have the Li family mason goes, which leads me to believe we may have another mason group out there

You're paying great attention here, Tamuz. What tipped you off? Was it our claim?

Anyway, I think it might be important to share a little information. Glork and I have a third mason, our daughter. It looks like our "daughter" is recruitableish or something.

So I personally think we had only 1 SK and we have one mafia which may be able to recruit to some degree.