Wizards at the Sorcerers' Den - Endgame

Riceballtail · Post Post #2400 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:44 am

VOTE:Zdenek

blind sheeping FTW

Bunnylover · Post Post #2401 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:39 am

Zdenek you have two choices:
1) Claim and have the possibility of dieing
or
2) Be hammered

WrathChild · Post Post #2402 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:45 am

Just hammer him, claiming won't do anything but result in a mod-kill. Each person has what, six abilities, what's claiming gonna do.

Zdenek · Post Post #2403 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:57 am

Someone unvote now.

Zdenek · Post Post #2404 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:21 am

Adventurers, want to win?

Vote Baby Spice with me, and tomorrow scum plus you will outnumber the town, and we'll be able to co-ordinate for a joint win.

Unvote
Vote Baby Spice

GreyICE · Post Post #2405 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:29 am

No thanks, I don't negotiate with scum.

Zdenek · Post Post #2406 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:30 am

Isn't that playing against your win-con?

GreyICE · Post Post #2407 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:34 am

Nope.

First, if scum outnumber town, you probably achieve your win condition and the game ends thus freezing our point gains.

Second, trusting scum is inherently unsafe because you guys have an ability to plan outside our sight. The masons do too, but on a much smaller scale.

Third, of course you're going to tell me everything we want to hear.

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2408 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:35 am

LOL GG HAMMER

fucking finally we get a scum lynch

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2409 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:36 am

GreyICE wrote:No thanks, I don't negotiate with scum.

oh god you realise the GAMBIT potential you had, if we had derp scum here?

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2410 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:36 am

Bunnylover wrote:Zdenek you have two choices:
1) Claim and have the possibility of dieing
or
2) Be hammered

gogogogogogo hammah

Zdenek · Post Post #2411 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:37 am

GreyICE wrote:Nope.

First, if scum outnumber town, you probably achieve your win condition and the game ends thus freezing our point gains.

Second, trusting scum is inherently unsafe because you guys have an ability to plan outside our sight. The masons do too, but on a much smaller scale.

Third, of course you're going to tell me everything we want to hear.

I would absolutely not lie in this circumstance because I might want to do it again in another game.

We can work together.

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2412 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:39 am

SELF HAMMER.

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2413 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:39 am

'in another game I might be scum getting lynched and there might be 4 neutral 3rd parties who could maybe help me win'

also he just fucking told us how many scum were left

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2414 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:40 am

wait does that mean there's FIVE scum left? how is that possible

GreyICE · Post Post #2415 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:41 am

A Gaggle of Geese wrote:
GreyICE wrote:No thanks, I don't negotiate with scum.

oh god you realise the GAMBIT potential you had, if we had derp scum here?

Yep, but the inherent risks would be the town takes it seriously because we don't share your win condition.

And it's not like the scum wouldn't turn on us if you guys did...

SpyreX · Post Post #2416 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:42 am

Not for the full deal, just long enough for him to feed another name.

But, yes, lets make this be dead.

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2417 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:42 am

HAMMER THIS FUCK.

gandalf, merk peregrineV

imma be a sexy slut and block someone.

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2418 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:44 am

GreyICE wrote:
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:
GreyICE wrote:No thanks, I don't negotiate with scum.

oh god you realise the GAMBIT potential you had, if we had derp scum here?

Yep, but the inherent risks would be the town takes it seriously because we don't share your win condition.

And it's not like the scum wouldn't turn on us if you guys did...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5sriixc ... re=related

GreyICE · Post Post #2419 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:46 am

5 scum
1 third party lyncher?
4 third party neutral (Pro and anti town)

15 townies?

That's fairly vicious balance against the town, but on the outside edge of what's possible, especially if we assume the game design that went into this is... questionable (given I've had at least one of my abilities retroactively altered for 'not being fair' when I tried to use it, we're going to assume this).

So, confirmed scum:

InHim
SGR
Zdenek
Feysal

Probs scum
PereV
Surye

It's like a fucking buffet.

GreyICE · Post Post #2420 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:49 am

Jesus, if it's a five man scum team and there's 10 dead townies

Literally Baby spice is the only thing standing between you guys and total oblivion.

No wonder SGR started dancing in the thread.

SpyreX · Post Post #2421 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:52 am

We'll have a couple bro's take out PereV. Who's the next most wounded in that list (if you have an action you're not sure about, killing one of them would be a good idea)

gandalf5166 · Post Post #2422 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:52 am

A Gaggle of Geese wrote:HAMMER THIS FUCK.

gandalf, merk peregrineV

imma be a sexy slut and block someone.

I don't know if he'll be dead today, but he'll almost definitely be dead tomorrow.

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2423 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:53 am

oh wat

but with the claim shenaanigans and day 2 5 is HARSH

A Gaggle of Geese · Post Post #2424 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:53 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
A Gaggle of Geese wrote:HAMMER THIS FUCK.

gandalf, merk peregrineV

imma be a sexy slut and block someone.

I don't know if he'll be dead today, but he'll almost definitely be dead tomorrow.

I can help you take him out. how healthy are you again?