Flash mafia 3 (town wins)

Fate · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:07 am

Amrun is asking day old questions to fill the thread with noise and show how "town" she is.

YEAH I DID IT

I'M GOIN

FOR

THE DOBULE BUS

KEKKAHAHAHAAHA

populartajo · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:09 am

farside22 wrote:
populartajo wrote:
farside22 wrote:
Tajo also on my list, I figured if I called him out and stated suspicion he might be cautions.

lol not only you told me i was town all day 1, but cautious of what?

I made a post later in the game about a comment you made and added you to the list of people I was suspicious of.

*sigh*
Does no one read these day?

I isolated you.

Never found this post.

Help me to help you.

farside22 · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:10 am

Amrun wrote:Not sure why Llamarble would state that we should lynch whomever farside blocked - and didn't you disagree there, Fate? - if he knew he had been blocked (or suspected he had been). Except for wifom, of course - but how likely is that here?

Lots of WIFOM.

Also you calling me town

so far every game I town you hold me questionable to scummy.

farside22 · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:12 am

Prior to this comment I had a list of those I would RB. I stated a few post later:

farside22 wrote:
Also add tajo to my list. Something he said about my role claim really sat badly with me.

populartajo · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:18 am

my bad

wait no

what is that something?

farside22 · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:25 am

populartajo wrote:my bad

wait no

what is that something?

You questioned my roleblocking claim and thought it wasn't a real role. Then when GW claimed VT you were all over trying to save him which sat even more odd with me. I know I have been in games where someone that claims VT gets lynched all the time. I also know scum claim VT. I have no clue where you got the VT claim is a death sentence view and it rubbed me wrong.

farside22 · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:26 am

I know I have been in games where someone that claims VT gets lynched all the time

This should read where VT's don't get lynched all the time

mykonian · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:52 am

Votecount

Llamarble (4): Fate, Farside22, populartajo, Porochaz
Parabollocks (1): Amrun

Not voting (8): DrippingGoofball, crypto, Regfan, a girl on the internet, Ythill, Ellibereth, Llamarble, Parabollocks

With 13 players, it's 7 to lynch

Amrun · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:04 am

farside22 wrote:
Amrun wrote:Not sure why Llamarble would state that we should lynch whomever farside blocked - and didn't you disagree there, Fate? - if he knew he had been blocked (or suspected he had been). Except for wifom, of course - but how likely is that here?

Lots of WIFOM.

Also you calling me town
so far every game I town you hold me questionable to scummy.

Unless you're claiming scum in [redacted] that simply isn't true. We haven't played together much anyway.

But I did realize that Llamarble's "assuming scum can't no kill" adds a layer of wifom. Who doesn't let scum no kill if they want?

Fate, I'll ask however many questions I please. If I had been arond to ask them organically, I would have.

Fate · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:12 am

I never said you couldn't scum it up as much as you please.

Feel free

Amrun · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:14 am

I'd appreciate it if you did answer my question, though.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:29 am

populartajo wrote:In other news, Regfan and DGB are still scum.

gg.

Last time you had a town read on me was in 1998.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:32 am

I intend to vote Lmarble.

Amrun · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:36 am

Then why not do it?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:38 am

In case there is further information on the way. If none has emerged in the next 2-3 days, I will cast my vote.

Amrun · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:41 am

Then why not put it somewhere else, pursue other suspicions?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:43 am

Amrun wrote:Then why not put it somewhere else, pursue other suspicions?

I don't know why, nothing's really jumping at me.

farside22 · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:53 am

Since the game is still ongoing I will shelf that talk for later Amrun.
I recall however in said game you found me town but questionable. (will look at that in a bit).

DGB: Your lack of effort is noted.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:15 am

I know.

crypto · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:35 am

Crypto: Null leaning scum. Where did your suspicion of Parabollocks go, crypto? Also, what happened to turn your thoughts around on GW in post 420? All of a sudden he's not mafia in that post. Why? Not much changed about his posts in that time frame. And THEN you hammer him with no explanation. Please explain your evolving read on GW. Also why did you ask everyone's opinions on AGOTI without expressing your own?

GW felt town to me. I hammered him because the majority was bent on lynching him and I was getting fed up with the dragged-out day.

crypto · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:35 am

I want to see Regfan's thoughts that he was planning on revealing at the end of yesterday.

crypto · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:38 am

Leaning toward sheeping the roleblock theory right now given what my process of elimination is leaving me with.

Amrun · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:46 am

Crypto, please answer my questions.

crypto · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:49 am

AGOTI is suspicious to me because he's been sniping from the sidelines and has said little, granted I've been similar. Parabollocks I'm unsure of. I already answered the GW question.

Amrun · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:57 am

Where did you answer it?