GreyICE wrote:So obv scum is posting in the thread again, Mastin please fix your frontal lobotomy post haste.
Town vote for toon fighter now plox
He voted Bowser. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
GreyICE wrote:So obv scum is posting in the thread again, Mastin please fix your frontal lobotomy post haste.
Town vote for toon fighter now plox
mastin2 wrote:*snip total nonsense*
GI wrote:So you basically want to lynch people to confirm whether or not your pet theory is in some way functional rather than lynching scummy people.
malpascp wrote:Vote:hiplop
Your reactions to mastin's posts were pretty awful. And the "you are killing us both!" thing was just the scummiest thing I saw in this game. We shouldn't hammer him already, though. There is a lot to discuss before N1.
mastin2 wrote:I feel the need to point out a correction in my post.
When I said "share the same view". I didn't mean, "these guys share a lot of the same reads". (Do they have any reads in common? I have no clue; I didn't check, because that's not what I was saying.) I meant "share the same opportunistic view". Their outlook on the game. For all of them, it's a scum mind-set.
mastin2 wrote:Yes and "I-don't know". You have the same scum-opportunistic-outlook on the game. This is quite evident, and painfully obvious.
Your reads, well, quite frankly, I don't know what they are, and couldn't care less. They could be the same, they could be different, they could be somewhere in the middle; it's irrelevant because it's not the point I was trying to communicate.
vezokpiraka wrote:Lynch someone already.
mastin2 ( 1 ) - Tomie Uzumaki
Tomie Uzumaki ( 1 ) - Pine
zMuffinMan ( 1 ) - somerandomguy
chkflip ( 1 ) - lewarcher82
11 Votes to Lynch
You people. We aren't lynching any of those today. Change your vote to a big wagon.
Toon Fighter wrote:ISO:
Bowser: His posts are shit and his analysis are worse shit. His response to chkflip's attack is a terrible post. He request replacement, stops when he gets voted for that, and is overall bad. He seems to be a VI, but I can see some scum motivation behind his posts. UNVOTE: VOTE: Bowser
hiplop: Not a very good player so far, but his attacks on pappum's seem reasonable. He seems to be trying to scumhunt more and is looking less scum to me. hiplop, would you agree on a Bowser lynch?
pappum's: reading is ISO, he still seems scummy, but not as scummy has I had thought. He gets a little angry and is trying very hard to defend himself.He is definitely a better lynch than hiplop, and his case on hiplop seems bullshit. As for your question, hiplop seems to be a VI that is trying to participate, and you look like a scumbag trying to mislynch him.
pappums rat wrote:hiplop wrote:i think it was kind of implied oh great maxous. dont take things so literally
fairly obvious i was pushing on Muffin all game, but his latest posts made him propel up the charts
As has been noted, this is a gross exaggeration of hiplop's "pushing" of zMuffinMan.
First mention of him was his iso 7, where he told him to "stop distracting town".
Second was iso 20, where he asked him why he was voting Bowser.
Third was iso 22, where he was asking him why he thinks Bowser is scum.
Fourth was iso 25 (posted today) where he says he wasnt defending Bowser (which he obviously wasn't) but says he was "attacking" ZMuffinMan (which he obviously wasn't). He goes on to say that zMuffinMan is "blindly bandwagoning" and is now also in the "scum trio".
hiplop clearly was not pushing ZMuffinMan all game, he was asking him questions and then when hiplop gets a little pressure with an erroneous comment about defending Bowser, he greatly overstated his scumhunting on zMuffinMan. This I do see scum motivation in, and since edmund's wagon is going nowhere,
unvote
Vote: hiplop