futhermore they are IC and SE, and they havent died yet.
He pushed this argument on us about ten times. There are in every Newbie Game, 2 SEs and 1 IC. His argument for half of Day 2 was that Packbat and Panacea were scum because they were still alive. However 1 SE did die, and there was only 1 night phase. now 1 SE and 1 IC have dies, and there have been two nightphases. inb4 "Panacea is scum because she is still alive and she is an SE!!!" lolno.
smallpeoples, how would you feel about a pac/pan lynch?
i know its way way way way too early, beleive me i know, but i have hunch, dont you smallpeoples? they are persecuting you together and you know your town. so dont you think they are scum?
Even though smallpeopels flipped town, I still find this little play very... off. It just doesn't feel right. It feels like he is trying to talk smallpeopels into his opinion just for the easy sheepvote.
eh, just the IRC in me.
He uses this when confronted about his impatience with replies to questions he asks. Basically he is saying "I am used to fast-paced games and so I was getting impatient." Yet now he is all over me, BECAUSE i made the game more fast-paced (read: to his liking) by voting quickly (read: like I had already said I would)
what a fitting place to stop, eh? every time i go on 1122 something comes up.
anyway, i think they are too close, or maybe because the name sounds good, still dont know. SPplz would be my ideal lynch from what i can gather now, but imo too soon. espeically with pac and pan on peoples wagon. maybe they are trying to take advt. of his play. futhermore they are IC and SE, and they havent died yet.
smallpeoples, how would you feel about a pac/pan lynch?
i know its way way way way too early, beleive me i know, but i have hunch, dont you smallpeoples? they are persecuting you together and you know your town. so dont you think they are scum?
VOTE: Packbat
As numberQ pointed out this post reads like this: "I agree, I want to lynch smallpeopls. He is my first choice to lynch. Smallpeoples don't you want to defend yourself? Smallpeoples, don't you think packbat and panacea are scummy? Its WAY TO EARLY to vote. Vote:Packbat"
i honestly just don't get the back-and-forth contradistinctions in this post. I'm used to having to point out contradictions people make in SEPERATE posts. this is a first time I have had to point out contradictions made IN THE SAME POST
@numberQ, i said i knew it was too soon to vote pac, not small. im not jumping to conclusions, i have some good arguments i said above.
He says he was saying (in the above quoted post) that his goal was to say it was TO EARLY TO VOTE PACKBAT. then goes on to vote packbat.
TOWN DO NOT QUICKHAMMER, LET SCUM DO THAT
This being said when A: his two prime suspects as scum are already voting. B: when you vote someone, its generally because, YOU THINK THEY ARE SCUM, meaning the scum partner isn't going to HAMMER on his partner.
SO basically either way, how does this work? Both scum are already on him "let scum hammer" sooo..... OR he is scum, hence the vote on him, so of course his partner won't hammer... This looks like an easy way to set up and townie who votes last to look like scum...
smallpeoples, someone who i fully beleived to be as scum (just by de facto being lurking, and now that ive looked at them Pac/Pans reasons against him)
Would these be the same reasons that you said meant Packbat and Panacea were scum? OHOHO I JUST NOTICED SOMETHING! stuntmans action so far: [stuntman impersonation]-joins game- -votes packbat- HE IS IC IF HE IS STILL ALIVE HE MUST BE SCUM -rages about packbats scummieness- -notices nobody is following his IC lynch- -jumps on the biggest bandwaggon- -townie dies- -the guy he wanted to get lynched dies that night- MY EVIL PLAN WORKED OUT PERFECTLY. [/stuntman impersonation]
i voted Packbat to illicit a response as a player did to me when replacing in my last game when she couldnt decide my allingment. then, in a mirror of what IaI did (he was mafia that game, but did this to either appear town or to manipulate me in mafias favor, kind of a win win for him regardless the turnout) i tried to get smallpeoples to agree with me on something i do not beleive in, that is choosing his persecutors (Pan/Pac) and trying to see what his reaction would be to find out a town player (assuming he was scum which i thought he was) pushing a lynch that would benefit him and scum (as atm i assumed pan was very town) and expose him. his response would impact my view of him. having pac onboard with the vote was killing two birds with one stone, making everything come together. seemed more legit when i coupled both things. i mean, no one saw through my plan, except maybe smallpeople which i doubt.
So let me get this straight. Your entire first 2-3 days in the thread everything you did was a LIE (Notice to townies: let scum do all lying, lying and gambits and tricks yourself, don't turn out well for the town). The entire thing was some master plan of yours that nobody else can understand. You expect us to go along with this? Manipulating the game according to their OWN PERSONAL AGENDAS, lying, and master plans are scum-tactics. Try not to use them as town.
which defeated the entire purpose of this and i grew tired waiting
just reinforcing my earlier "he likes things FAST then gets mad at me when I make things FAST" point.
oh btw the game is 1107, mafia won only because i lynched way way too early in lylo.
Lets NOT see a repeat performance please.
im not going to take this seriously unless you acknowledge that was a different stuntman saying those things.
A: Threatening the town with an Ultimatum. Also a scum tactic. Repeat: Do Not Use Scum Tactics As Town.
B: What is this? we have to pretend everything you said before this line was complete drivel? lolno. I will take every word you ever said in this game, at face value. don't like this? don't feed us BS to appease us.
all stuff i said about you and pac, didnt mean a thing.
I know you guys are probably tired of me repeating myself, but one more time for the luls: LYING IS A SCUM TACTIC. DO NOT LIE AS TOWN.
it was all a scam.
Town should not attempt to scam other town.
i said those things to send pac into a bit of a rage to see if he would scumtell and mainly to see how smallpeople would respond
[stuntman impersonation]"I only said what I said hoping to make the IC look bad so we could lynch him, but since he didn't make himself look bad I am willing to vote smallpeoples out of the town since it still helps my overall scum agenda"[/stuntman impersonation]
and that TOWN DO NOT thing, well imo it kind of foolproof. town wont vote town,
By this argument, the scumteam consists of: Panacea, Packbat, Stuntman, Maruchan, Oversoul, zMuffinMan, Vader. Why? all of these people at one point in the game voted a confirmed townie. The only person free of this suspicion, is numberQ. why? His vote has been on me almost the whole game. so good for him. Lets pretend this theory is 100% true, we should all at this point sheep numberQ as being the only confirmed townie.
and scum wont vote scum.
I beg of you to read
This Article in its entirety. By your ploy, a scum could have hammered his scum buddy, JUST SO YOU WOULD THINK HIM AS CONFIRMED TOWNIE. wow what a ploy that would have been.
pac agrees with me, he sees its town. so i guess your calling him scum too then.
Humans can be wrong. Just because someone else doesn't see it as scummy, doesn't mean that someone else is right. People Can Be Wrong. proof of this: We lynched Vader d1, and smallpeoples d2.
i dont see how i put myself in the lime light.
Raise of hands, who here at least SLIGHTLY suspects stuntman after his gambit-filled, ploy-centered play style of yesterday? I think most of the town is raising their hands at least slightly. Thats how you got put in the limelight.
i was cheated too. my whole "gambit", the "ploy", was all to get more stuff out of smallpeople so i could use that information against him and others.
Using information against people. Sounds scummy. You could've worded this better, that is unless you were scum.
Panacea wrote: I also wanted more Stuntman... On the bright side, I doubt Tomorrow will be Lylo, but I guess we'll see soon.
gah! that is very scummy to me. you doubt tomorrow will be lylo? only scum would know for sure. please enlighten me to your doubts.
What she said was not scummy. she didn't say she was SURE today would not be lylo, she said she doubted. as we all SUSPECTED smallpeoples of being SCUM, we ALL should have DOUBTED today would be lylo. Why? If we had lynched scum yesterday, today would not be lylo.
that is no excuse not for you not to care about what I think. your confirmed town to yourself, and from my pov im confirmed town, and so if i think your scum and you should beleive your really not, scum WILL take advantage of that. bad play right their.
I really don't see how it is bad play to not care what SCUM thinks of me. Scum will target anyone they feel is more likely for them to get an easy lynch. Why would I care what scum thinks? its not like scum would really FoS me. They know who all the scum are. They only fake FoSes on town.
my vote was not a ploy. putting him at L1 was never a ploy. i truly beleived he was scum and voted him BECAUSE HE DIDNT RESPOND. not because i was trying to get more out of him. that would of been used against his REPLACEMENT, which you decided was best to not let someone else speak.
NOT because you were trying to get more information out of him? but three quotes ago you said you WERE trying to get more information out of him. to use against others. Or did you forget that....
Now to move on to the scummieness I saw from his predecessors, since they were the same role as him, I feel it is relevant:
Oman:
4) No I'm not. Because I'm not lucky enough to be tricking newbies
5) Scum. It requires less work. Honestly.
Honestly, those two lines just come across kinds iffy to me.
He posted like twice and left, the dude wasn't enjoying it/wasn't interested in the long haul. It's pretty common.
Seems like this is a trend with this role.
Packbat/Val scumpair is kinda likely.
Convenient that between the Stuntman and Oman, this role position has FoSed every dead townie so far in the game as their mane suspects.....
After this we enter a night-phase. During this nightphase, we get a night-phase extension. This means somebody with a night-action role had a question, problem, issue, or needed a replacement. Immediately following this night-phase, Oman is MiA for 3 days. He is then replaced. This would fall quite nicely into the reason the night took so long. Oman wasn't posting in his QT. His partner asked the mod to stall the night to try to find a replacement quickly. Mod stalls the nightphase. Replacement can't be found. Game continues, Oman is left in the dust, Replacement becomes necessary.
Either this is a very surprisingly well-timed COINCIDENCE, or wow that is scummy. (I don't believe in coincidences btw)
If anyone has any questions by anything I said in this post. please speak up I would be happy to clarify.
PEdit: NumberQ, not smart to vote unless you're sure