Look, I lean town on him, but I'm not sure. This is not about what I think of Snarky, this is about how you keep voting him every day and me not understanding why, thinking what you have said about him is weak. If you feel like you've detailed your case thoroughly, then I guess I just don't see it as very strong or convincing.
And why are we switching the subject off you ruining a perfectly good massclaim that could have caught scum? If it was as obvious and stupid as you say, then it wouldn't have caught scum, but wouldn't have hurt us at all to try it.
You didn't answer how a massclaim would have
benefited
scum. Please explain.
Talk nerdy to me.
"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
elvis_knits wrote:
When somebody proposes a plan that has even half a chance of catching scum (and zero chance of hurting the town), you go along with it unless you're scum.
This is the same reasoning that "pegged" Cirno as scum. How is Amrun different?
Scum, having been burned twice by fakeclaims, surely know by now that it's futile - at least in a popcorn situation. But town might get lolgambit ideas from ctd and then we'd lynch them for nothing.
Snarky gets more opportunistic as you fencesit some more, ek.
elvis_knits wrote:
When somebody proposes a plan that has even half a chance of catching scum (and zero chance of hurting the town), you go along with it unless you're scum.
This is the same reasoning that "pegged" Cirno as scum. How is Amrun different?
Cirno was acting like scum. He even fake claimed. I guess he was just being a pain in the arse and fucking with the game.
If you're town, don't deliberately act like scum. If you do, I can't be blamed for thinking you're scum.
So there's no real difference between Cirno and Amrun, they're both acting like scum.
Talk nerdy to me.
"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
EK wrote:However, Calcifer calling Amrun town is pretty bad, IMO.
This is a good sign that you're tunneling too hard.
Tunneling on who?
I've given Amrun like a million chances, tried to withhold judgement on her when other people called her scummy, and now have voted her for the first time because of a very scummy action she has made.
Not sure how that's tuneling.
Talk nerdy to me.
"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
Amrun wrote:Scum, having been burned twice by fakeclaims, surely know by now that it's futile - at least in a popcorn situation. But town might get lolgambit ideas from ctd and then we'd lynch them for nothing.
Snarky gets more opportunistic as you fencesit some more, ek.
The same page that I asked for a massclaim you had seacore refusing to claim for Charlie. Obviously not everyone was sure it was mountainous. It was not common knowledge, evidence to that fact was on the same page.
Talk nerdy to me.
"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
I personally believe that some lion cub has an affinity for vanilla or mountains. Since this is my own opinion I don't think it necessary to explain why I agree with elvis_knits in the above post. This vote isn't merely sheeping, but I'd be lying if I said it wasn't influenced. VOTE: Amrun
L-1 alert.
In other news, snarky + 1 Town point, Calcifer + 1 Scum point.
I don't care too much. Amrun has already claimed. His case on snarky was not enough reason to hold off. (Granted I had forgotten about that lack of computer access)
Altilysian, what do you say when I declare you my new "best sheepable player" title?
(I may or may not be serious when I say this; it's really a spur-of-the-moment kind of thing)
