Castle Bravo wrote:Can both players show me the breadcrumbs on who they targeted in case they died overnight?
(I can't take credit for this joke buuuuut) I never knew you were a fisherman.
Castle Bravo wrote:Can both players show me the breadcrumbs on who they targeted in case they died overnight?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Castle Bravo wrote:
I can understand the issue with two neighborizors in a game, it's a really strong role since it proves that people are town every day even if it dies if it targets scum.
Can both players show me the breadcrumbs on who they targeted in case they died overnight?
Um Neighborizors do nothing of the sort. Masons prove alignment via their role. Neighborizors don't. It is very doubtful there are any breadcrumbs to find given the roles.
Castle Bravo wrote:Huh? Are you saying they can recruit scum?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Castle Bravo wrote:Huh? Are you saying they can recruit scum?
Neigbhorizors recruit players to a Neighborhood. No-one in the Neighborhood is alignment confirmed. Town and scum both are fully capable of having a Neighborizor role. I can link to tons of examples as necessary.
Castle Bravo wrote:MagnaofIllusion wrote:Castle Bravo wrote:Huh? Are you saying they can recruit scum?
Neigbhorizors recruit players to a Neighborhood. No-one in the Neighborhood is alignment confirmed. Town and scum both are fully capable of having a Neighborizor role. I can link to tons of examples as necessary.
Oh well that's a stupid role then. They should both recruit someone in each other's neighborhood to prove they're not cult leaders. But cults always lose so who cares? Town can get a lot of silly bad roles.
Let's lynch rodion. He's scummy.
Junpei wrote:Just to point out, in post 1587 killerjester unvotes when he had no vote up to begin with. Could mean a lot of things, just pointing it out for others to see in case they missed it.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Rainbowdash wrote:Of course it was obvious that he essentially claimed VT early on, which is that town tell I was harping on all yesterday.The thing is silver doesn't give me the air of someone who is very attentive to their past posts, and if scum someone who very easily could have decided to claim some power on a whim, and get instant caught.Thats why him being off the Zinger wagon was a massive towntell, and if ever combined with an eventual VT claim which after the early posts today we are getting regardless of his alignment, would make him one of my top town reads. Would the trap have worked if he is scum?No clue, but I wanted it there just incase, which leaves me a little peeved that ponies have gone and wrecked it.
The bolded I find not very believable. I’m sorry but setting it up as some grand 'Tarp' on the off chance he was dumb enough to ‘forget’ he claimed Vanilla to catch him later when you could have lynched him over a claimed Power Role is just pointless.
[/quote]Rainbowdash wrote:You know what town normally does when they see two town reads fighting?The STOP THE FIGHT by trying to prove why both people are town to everypony else, or at least prove why their pick is more likely scum.You did neither, but just sat back the entire time.
I’ve bolded the part that I find laughably scummy.
1. I’d love to see examples Day 1 of ‘proving Towniness’ that actually have any credibility.
2. You are knocking someone who didn’t push a wagon on Town Power Role while you yourself did? Fantastic work their Chief.
David Xanatos wrote:You know, in that game you were actually worse. You self-hammered as Town, putting the game into MYLO... that's not exactly something to be proud of having meta for. If you'd no-lynched, or let the deadline expire, it would have went to 5-2.. better odds at least, combined with the NL and the mafia lynch... I simply can't see the logic in your play that game. You know for a fact you are Town, and by self-hammering you gave the Scum an advantage. -_-
Trying to look for scum behavior in the wagons by looking for how scum wanted to save the claimed Town PR by wagoning you isn’t very fruitful or even logical, IMO.
I don’t know what you are even trying to say in the bolded portion. I’ll respond to it if you clarify.
1. Way to put words in my mouth. When did I say I “know” you are scum or say that I was waiting for L-1?
Killer wrote:Considering how suspicious everyone finds him, I feel he's harboring his vote by placing it on Nero. With the classic, "Just following my D1 play!" as his sole excuse.
silverbullet999 wrote:
-Banshee
In regards to your wall vote post
Same as I stated before.
Where is the iso you did of me or was the vca all that it was?
The fact that you've done that before as town, ironically, makes me believe it more likely to be a scum gambit here since you immediately referred to your meta as proof of your towniness.
silverbullet999 wrote:EBWOP
-Banshee
Also post the iso of me anyway, throw it in a spoiler. It's easier to have the whole thing thrown in a post if it's a culmination of what you agree with so far in regards to me or what not.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Andrew wrote:@everyone you know how you demanded junpei's track. and he said vezok. what if vezok said he did go somewhere. who would you believe.
This is scummy strirring the pot. You’ve asking us to take sides in a theoretical scenario that hasn’t happened. Vezok and Junpei did not contradict each other.
im not 'stirring' the pot. i remember soeone saying 'if vezok says something else, junpei hangs'.
Andrew wrote:ok so moi outed me. cool. after wanting more votes on pappum.
Wanting more votes on another scummy candidate doesn’t mean I shouldn’t do what I think is best for Town. And at this stage I’m doubting very much you are Town. So I wanted to directly post the inforamtion.
fair enough
Andrew wrote:compare that to my posts in the thread
Are you asking me to compare them to the QT thread? I’m not clear on your point here.
in the game thread. my other game threads. all my QT threads. the 'lurk' as you call it, is not lurk. its coming on once a day
Andrew wrote:lol whats wrong with that
So as theortical Town Neighborizer you’d rather skip the ability to take a Town read into the QT to bounce reads off of Day 1 and instead want to hold off? Unless your ability is more restricted than you have indicated I don’t see a Town reason for doing that.
its not more restricted than i said. iwas thinking thinking thinking and thought you. as a theoritcal scum neighborizer, would instead grab a scum buddy or someone that lurks, or a crap guy? i noticed your good play in our vengeful game ages ago. theortically i wouldnt get some strong playes?
Scum on the other hand would have to balance the danger of bringing a Town player into the QT and risk getting fingered for play on two fronts (Thread and QT)
no they dont... how so.
Andrew wrote:because i dont even know what that is.i have scumhunting in the thread. you never intiated any reads on any players privately. all my reads i posted on the game
I didn’t initiate reads as a means of testing you. The other Neighborizer did offer reads up unbidden. You did not.
ok... did he then post those reads in the game thread?
Andrew wrote:i had a feeling i was the less town
So instead of trying to demonstrate through Pro-Town actions you just asked instead?
pro town is not town. if everyone acts pro town, who do you lynch. scum act pro town.
Andrew wrote:same as why i didnt wanna day recruit fast. and bro i asked jason and he said you could invite anyone. i then asked if one was scum, whether he could invite his scumbuddies. he said yea. hello??
Hello whut? You are the Neighborizer. You are the ONLY one who can invite someone to the QT. Why would you even be concerned about being able to invite a scum-buddy unless you are scum?
see my reply above to david
Andrew wrote:read again
I did read. You said, paraphrased “I saw something the other Neighborizer said that was a scum slip and implicated Player Y as scum with them. So I recruited Player Y”. In the same QT post (36 BTW) you said to the effect of “I believe you are scummy for what the other Neighborizor said”.
Why you didn’t just recruit a Town read of yours is beyond me.
i have no main town reads. i considered grabbing a null read, but i wanted to grab that particular guy to see what he said etc
andrew94 wrote:junpei seriously. hes first post. he just made a general statement that looked like he was doing something when he was not. that so hard to get?
Junpei wrote:
1) YOU SAID WAFFLING. Jesus, not that he said he'd do something and didn't. In fact, he didn't say that he'd do anything in that post at all. This response post by you is scummier than if you had said "I'll tell you tonight in mafia chat, Silver".
andrew94 wrote:im pretty sure i was attempting to say next time someone claims pr.
Junpei wrote:
2) bullshit, you never implied anywhere anything about the very next PR claim, or the next PR claim in general. Scum points.
andrew94 wrote:Junpei, your post 1527, where u find all these examples. i notice you missed out thadmiral and some others who did the same thing
andrew94 wrote:@everyone you know how you demanded junpei's track. and he said vezok. what if vezok said he did go somewhere. who would you believe.
Junpei wrote:
3) That is the most idiotic question I've ever heard. That's saying "HEY GUYS U KNO DAT GUY U PUT ON L-2 ND SHIT WEL IF HE SED SOMETHIN AND IT WAS PROOOFED WONG BAI VEZOK WEL WOULD YOU LYNCH VEZOK HUE?." If Vezok came out and said my report was wrong there is no doubt in my mind I'd be insta-lynched. The good news is that Vezok would be the next day.
Junpei wrote:@Meransiel, why wouldn't they want to neighborize MoI?
Castle Bravo wrote:MagnaofIllusion wrote:Castle Bravo wrote:Huh? Are you saying they can recruit scum?
Neigbhorizors recruit players to a Neighborhood. No-one in the Neighborhood is alignment confirmed. Town and scum both are fully capable of having a Neighborizor role. I can link to tons of examples as necessary.
Oh well that's a stupid role then. They should both recruit someone in each other's neighborhood to prove they're not cult leaders. But cults always lose so who cares? Town can get a lot of silly bad roles.
Let's lynch rodion. He's scummy.