Honest Abel wrote:Right now it looks like Abel & dicknose vs. DarkClaymore & whilst.
That's false as I'm ready to vote for whilst at any moment.
When done skillfully, Double Bussing is even known to cause actual townies to dismiss suspicion of both of the bussing individuals,under the mistaken assumption that it is a town-on-town fight, and shouldn't be taken seriously.
Honest Abel wrote:whilst, why are you not voting for DarkClaymore? He is being obnoxiously scummy. Give me some good reasons tunneling dicknose is more important than questioning/lynching DC. I really don't get it. This guy has enough against him to be lynched three times. The way you are just ignoring that and actually complimenting his posts is really scummy. You are now on my scum list, which looks like this now, from least to most scummy:
Honest Abel wrote:Also, whilst, it looks like the only reason you are against dicknose here is because he put some pressure on you earlier, which is merely reactive. Let it go and move on to something else, if you have the power to do that.
dicknose wrote:whilst wrote:I wouldn't wage a massive war against the player, I would let someone else do the arguing for me, but I would agree and hope my lynch helps the bandwagon fall through. Something like that.
Like how you aren't arguing with me but agreeing with Darky's points against me? Good job, scum.
Honest Abel wrote:The main reason dicknose looks town to me is because he went after whilst when whilst said some scummy stuff, and now he's going after DarkClaymore because he's being consistently scummy. He's not stuck on one person, he puts pressure where it's needed. it's the easiest way to judge someone to be town, that I know of. And the reason I'm pointing this out is so you know who I'd want you all to trust once I'm dead.
IAI, cavjj, and NS are just sitting back and watching the drama unfold. Right now it looks like Abel & dicknose vs. DarkClaymore & whilst. I really want to know why whilst is so pro-DarkClaymore since he's easily the scummiest character I've ever played a mafia game with.
dicknose wrote:DarkClaymore wrote:Honest Abel wrote:I think we found our scumteam, everyone.
And I think you found a scum who does exactly what I expect him to: avoid voting for the lynchbait in order to not look bad latter on.
He voted for you.
Honest Abel wrote:@DC:
First of all, to your response to me, all I can say is: WHAT?! I have no idea what you are saying there.
Honest Abel wrote:Second, you're using the argument that two scum fighting looks like two town fighting to explain why I was fighting with someone who is confirmed town. You talk to much for how little sense you make. You are clutching at straws. Somebody lynch this goon for god's sake.
dicknose wrote:whilst wrote:Pretty nice question.
dicknose wrote:whilst wrote:Oh man, that's a great reason.
Honest Abel wrote:whilst, I'm going to look over your posts in detail, buddy. You're making me very wary. I'm just talking about how instead of doing anything productive, you're complimenting DC for his nonsense questions and rebuttals to dicknose. You've only really said anything about DC's posts that had to do with making dicknose seem like the minority. Maybe this is just recently, But I will find out soon enough. Also, the fact that DC said he was about to vote you when I implied you were on the same team was a really transparent way of trying to distance himself from you. I guess I really can't tell yet if it was a real attempt at distancing or if he was just trying to make you look scummy with him.
Honest Abel wrote:I'm really not hopeful about NS posting. He's been active lurking in my other game, too. I would love to hear from him and I Am Innocent. However, I am more than ready to lynch DarkClaymore. This guy not only has got to go, but he's left so many good clues about other players that it should be cake enough to determine who his buddy is once he's gone.
DarkClaymore wrote:Do I have to explain EVERYTHING? I mean seriously. Didn't you understand from what I was saying earlier?
Scum will prefer to not actively go after the lynchbait as that will make them VERY suspicious latter on. Whilst is doing this. Heck, you know what? I'm changing my opinion. If you are scum, your play style has too many risks. It's a reason that has been holding me for a while and that's why I should really make Whilst the top of my list and
VOTE: whilst
Honest Abel wrote:So DarkClaymore trying to say that
- He's been playing lynchbait and that's a great strategy
- I didn't vote for him
- Not voting for lynchbait is scummy
Not one part of that is true.
whilst wrote:
Like I said earlier, I think cavjj is scummier than you. I'm not going to jump on your lynch wagon and put you at L-1 -- (again), I don't want D-2 to end this early. Oh yeah, can I see the rest of your list? Assuming you've updated it.
Honest Abel wrote:Looks like at least DC learned a thing from the bussing article. Get it? Get it? He voted for whilst.
DC, I'm going explain again why your reasoning about me vs. BBmolla makes no sense: because he is confirmed town. You quoted something saying "two scum sometimes argue, and people dismiss is as town vs. town." BBmolla was confirmed town when he died. It doesn't apply.
dicknose wrote:DarkClaymore wrote:dicknose wrote:
He voted for you.
But he isn't atm.
Show me where he unvoted you and I'll agree with your point and vote Abel.
Honest Abel wrote:How would I explain the fact that FICTIONAL UNCITED STORYTIME YARN? I wouldn't. I'm not bothering with your nonsense anymore, DC.
DarkClaymore wrote:
I also have to say that the player I suspected acted pretty much like whilst is acting now. He was asked to vote but he refused without any solid reason. But again, I base this on a previous game and you won't like this reason.
DarkClaymore wrote:whilst wrote:
Like I said earlier, I think cavjj is scummier than you. I'm not going to jump on your lynch wagon and put you at L-1 -- (again), I don't want D-2 to end this early. Oh yeah, can I see the rest of your list? Assuming you've updated it.
You were quite against me when the day started. But suddenly somewhat changed your mind when it was obvious everyone suspect me.
DarkClaymore wrote:whilst wrote:The other points at which he votes for people to lynch are interesting to note, but none of the votes have "meant" anything, except for the vote on cavjj (as I have the second vote against cavjj). Do you get what I'm saying? The vote on wickedestjr didn't amount to anything, nor did the vote on you. It's just a pattern, imo -- his play style probably. I don't think it's anything to lynch him on. Or am I missing the point? Clarify if I am.
Here you are saying how you think most of my the votes are my playstye. Feels like a defense, as weak as it is. Strange how you try to make some of Abel's reasons seem off while you too said that I'm one of the top suspects on your list.
DarkClaymore wrote:
whilst wrote:I'm going to assume you put Wickedstjr at the top because of the fact that he could be waiting for us to lynch each other, and is not really missing in action. Am I correct? I'm asking because I've had the same rising suspicion. I don't think it's paranoia.
Still, I would put him at three or four on my list. I still want to hear his thoughts. My top two (yes, still):
1. cavjj
2. DarkClaymore
Also, here you try to outguess my reason and say you quite agree with it.
It feels like an attempt to show that you actually thought that I might be a reasonable town and that Abel was off by accusing me. This can work wonders for you if you are scum. Atm it seems like I'll be lynched. Once I get lynched and flip town, you'll be able to use some of these things you said against Abel in the next day. You can say that "I told him that he rushed too much and that some of his reasons were off".
It also appears like you are trying to please everyone. Both the town by agreeing I'm suspicious, and me by saying we agree about some stuff. That's just scummy.
DarkClaymore wrote:
whilst wrote:Actually, I wouldn't wage a massive war against the player, I would let someone else do the arguing for me, but I would agree and hope my lynch helps the bandwagon fall through. Something like that.
And that's what scum usually do. And THAT'S exactly what I was looking for by lynchbait play. And you seem to fit the pattern to some extend with me being that very suspicious player.
DC, why should we even listen to your reasoning if it has nothing to do with this game? You're acting scummy because it somehow hypothetically helps you in a game with different rules than ours? Great. I have a feeling your references to fictional/irrelevant games is a nervous tick you develop as scum because it helps you avoid answering questions honestly.
Again. It has nothing to do with the different rules. It can work perfectly here as well.
At that moment in the game (and now), you were/are in no danger of being lynched. If you were innocent, why wouldn't anyone suspect Abel for arguing with you?
dicknose wrote:What method exactly do you use to become lynchbait, Darky?
DarkClaymore wrote:I'd say starting from here. You said Abel shouldn't be suspecting me and IAI that much while you yourself made me one of the suspects a few posts before.
From that post on is seemed as if you dropped the idea of chasing me.
And you ignored how I mentioned you outguessing my reason for putting the IC on the top.