hiplop wrote:mastin2 wrote:GreyICE also ignores me to RVote.
Phoebus votes me without a word. But it's a Policy Vote. Phoebus's only game with me was when I was a Lyncher. It was a Large Normal. ("Lyncher. In. A. Normal. Whut?" Yeeeeeeeeeeeah, that game's kinda the reason we have setup reviewers, now.It also had a cult which could kill, and a mafia mason, among others.) He saw me as anti-town, he thinks of me in general as anti-town. Simple enough logic. I don't feel he would've bandwagoned me as scum.
At least, not like this--he votes me without a word. Implying his dislike, rather than flat-out stating it. It has a serious town Tone to the vote. (Yes, Votes have Tone. I cover this in my Guide To Scumhunting.)
This reeks of 1: bandwagoning (and perhaps hypocrisy--depends on how you interpret the "WIN"; the tone is rather ambiguous), and 2: bussing Tomie.Empking wrote:WIN
Vote: Tomie
Bowser--who trusted my reads in his last post--follows this trust to a logical conclusion. Serious town points, for Bowser.
No doubt Warrior's a newb. This ignorance reads as newb-town rather than newb-scum. The Late-RV is generally a signature town move.
Scumhunts on something which on the surface does look bad. This shows a legitimate interest in trying to find the scum. Muffin is among the first to do this. And is therefore town.Muffin wrote:And phoebus is scum
VOTE: Phoebus
1: Scum tone. Pappums uses safe wording. 2: This is fluff. Asking me what I intend to achieve with that strategy is something to make Pappums look like he's contributing to discussion, when in fact this question is useless. 3: It also plants doubt in the town's mind as to my legitimacy.Pappums wrote:Hey mastin what exactly are you trying to accomplish with these "reads" of yours?
Fencesitting. Leaves open a back door to track through if necessary, if the need arises for mastin-suspicion. Gives nothing productive to the discussion--doesn't mention why it's odd, doesn't say why he doesn't see scum motivation in it...doesn't give anything.I dont see any scum motivation behind it, I just think its kind of odd.
It's a worthless scum post. It has a clear scum motive behind it: trying to appear more town than he really is. And guess what? So far, the town appears to have mostly bought it.
Pressures hiplop, yet doesn't vote hiplop. It also subtly plants the idea that "Mastin's reads are worthless". (When I've rather conclusively shown you how my reads were in fact serious, and quite objective in their basis.)In what way could mastin's lolreads possibly be misconstrued by anyone as "trying to look helpful" ? He claims to have reads on people who have only posted their "/confirm".
Two scum in here, guaranteed. Edmund is one, and Pappums is the other. (This is one of the main reasons GreyICE is at the bottom of my scum-list: he really is the most likely to be wrong.)The Mod wrote:somerandomguy ( 2 ) - PranaDevil, warriormode
zMuffinMan ( 2 ) - somerandomguy, edmund.angles
Hirarky ( 2 ) - paupam's rat, GreyICE
I'd also expect one scum here as well. It's not Hiraki or Muffin, so if there's scum, it's Uprising/chk.paupam's rat ( 1 ) - Hirarky
Bowser ( 1 ) - Uprising
Phoebus ( 1 ) - zMuffinMan
This does need 1-2 scum on it, but I've pretty well explained my reads on pretty much all of them, showing why Tomie's my main suspect, here.mastin2 ( 6 ) - Toon Fighter, Tomie Uzumaki, Maxous, malpascp, Phoebus, hiplop
This is 3-5 of the scum. So, in conclusion, 0-2 (most likely one) is in the leftovers. Like, oh...
There! Very likely one scum. Empking fits the pattern.Tomie Uzumaki ( 3 ) - mastin2, Empking, Bowser
This is only through page three. (...I'm not going to finish this tonight, am I? >_< So much for my promise... :/)
This entire post. Way more than enough proof in here that hes a strong player. He's done much more than you have GREYICE
so in other news, lewarcher is scum. Making a big deal out of nothing...
In over half the quotes there he has just called people scum because they were voting and then decided to state who were the scum without giving reasons(just like he did when he made those lists)
@hiplop, why are you defending mastin when he can be defending himself. Why does he need any help? This looks like scumbuddies to me or at least buddying.
@lewarcher, I understood the term but I didn't realize he was applying it to the person he was quoting.
