Quilford - what the heck happened to your 'guarantee'
here
Amrun - 173 wrote: As stated, I do find fourseen scummy, but why are you avoiding the vifam issue?
?
He looks like a day 1 mislynch TBH.
Don't agree with his reasoning and suspicions but he looks to be actively trying to find scum. Weak reasoning early game does'nt indicate mafia.
It's hard to word this next one - but scum don't usually become the centre of attention like he did early in the game attacking people for the first reasons he could find.(looked more like
actual
scumhunting)
ckd - 187 wrote: why do you think that vifam is not paying a newbie card?
Because I don't see when/where he has tried to justify his actions etc. by claiming he is inexperienced.
Mastermind of Sin - 189 wrote: Maxous needs more votes before we lynch Vifam.
Nope, that's you my
white-knighting friend.
4 votes on the wagon. When Amrun asks who the scum is.
I can't be bothered to do a in-depth analysis.
You could of gave any reason or name as to who you thought was scum, but no, you did'nt actually have a reason to think that anyone was scum on the wagon.
Fourseen Circumstance wrote: unvote Lowell. Vote Maxious
I know I'm gonna love the explanation for this.