Dear Amrun,
here is your personal wall. anyone else may read at their convenience. Also @aukmid. your answer will be found near the bottom. basically it was to spite maruchan but for more reasoning and explanation, please read.
Here is the previous comments to mine. This is the conversation about saulres that I was supposedly quashing. How much Amrun, would you like us to talk about how saulres not laying down an RVS vote? Glowball and maruchan made their point, and glowball voted. What else do you want? Should we continue talking about it? What do you feel it means that saulres didnt rvs in the first place. Do you feel that after being prodded into making an rvs, it was justified that he wanted to change his to make a joke? Do you think he is playing this way because he's scum trying to be town? Or town trying not to be mislynched? Or because he is just genuinely new? Anyways on to the conversation that I so vehemently quashed. Btw the only one that even took these questions as something to respond to, and that it actually distracted was saulres. I'm not sure where you see all these other distractions. Yes maruchan, but he was the one talking about RQS before I brought it up.
Maruchan wrote:Also, quick note:
@ Anyone Planning on Starting RQS
I suggest not doing it. That is all.
why werent you still talking about saulres maruchan? Shame on you.
glowball wrote:What do you have against RQS? Not that I disagree, but I am interested in why specifically you are against it...
I see you have been distracted from saulres. Scum point for maruchan for distracting
Nobody Special wrote:Maruchan wrote:Also, quick note:
@ Anyone Planning on Starting RQS
I suggest not doing it. That is all.
Why do you hate America?
oh really, misrepping maruchans suggestion to not do RQS as unamerican, scummy indeed
Maruchan wrote:glowball wrote:What do you have against RQS? Not that I disagree, but I am interested in why specifically you are against it...
I have nothing against it personally, I just want to save an unsuspecting townie from getting attacked by a certain other player in this game.
Maruchan further distracting and quashing the conversation about saulres. If anything he should have amruns votes.
and here are my first two posts at about the 2 hour mark of the game.
lane0168 wrote:VOTE: MARUCHAN
Doesn't like it if people dont participate in RVS, and doesn't like it when people do participate, or start, RQS. Whether or not someone wants to spew questions, the conversation will start eventually. Probably in the wrong direction.
Being one not to take much weight in what someone does or does not do in RVS, I did not feel that I would be voting for someone who didnt RVS or even continue the conversation that had already been quashed. Quashed quashed quashed. This was still rvs, but I meant my point when I said it. So I guess kind of it was RVS, kind of not. Either way, it was another thing to note, but not put a lot of weight into.
lane0168 wrote:@Nobody Special. what is wrong with knit hats? and why do you feel its a knit hat, and not a birthday party hat? i feel like its a birthday party hat.
SRQS (slightly random question stage)
Does everyone feel the same way about knit hats?
Is it a knit hat or a birthday party hat?
Still assuming we were in RVS stage and the 2 hour mark, and having many people still not responding in the thread yet, I decided I would have a little fun with nobody special, and try to get a feel for how he answers question. Sometimes its not only the questions that are asked, but also the answers, and the way the answers were given. As for the RQS portion of this, that was just to spite maruchan.
Anyways, there's my answers. I feel I did fairly good. Can we move on from the knit hats now? Or are you not satisfied with my quashing of the quashed conversation.
Amrun, when glow and maru started talking about RQS instead of Saulres, hence quashing the conversation before I had ever made a post, why did you not find this suspicious? Cause you can not honestly tell me that I am the person who quashed the conversation.
One last thing, you say I quashed the conversation for a little bit and then it resumed. I'd like to point out that the initial conversation was for saulres not voting in RVS. The second was saulres asking if it'd be suspicious to change his RVS which sparked ANOTHER AND SEPERATE conversation for an entirely different time and action.