Katsuki, 153 wrote:Scum I caught will need to wait, probably until after my vacation ends. Activity restraints etc. etc.
Meanwhile sheeping Elli is the way to go.
Unvote, VOTE: SC
p.s. Elli, you know how we're "good at mafia"? That "group" of people that we don't trust there can't be trusted here as well. Lemme know if you need further explanations.
Caught scum but not voting and then sheeping Fate? Seriously? Even if you don't have time to explain your "caught scum" you can still vote them and then provide your case later. Or, here's a shocker, leave your vote where it was presumably because it was on someone you thought was scum.
Bogre, 177 wrote: UNVOTE: VOTE ELLIBERETH
You need some votes so you stop acting like an idiot. Or scum trying to fake VI.
At least Noc is making an effort.
It's pretty hard to fake being a VI when you have a significant posting history so I don't really buy that as a good reason to vote; plus voting for someone to make them straighten up? Plus, "at least Noc is making an effort" meaning at least someone you think is scummy is making an effort so isn't lynch worthy? None of this post sits well.
Blackberry, 185 wrote:OH. I ALMOST FORGOT.
PBT 1 - xvart scum
PBT 2 - xvart scum
PBT 3 - xvart ??? ... SCUM!
Xvart, do you LIKE being scum? O_o
lol. I don't particularly like being scum anymore.
Blackberry, 191 wrote:The fact that both Reckoner and xvart are voting because of flavor is very fail.
You both played in PBT other game(s)... Shouldn't you KNOW that townies get lots of interesting flavor?
As you pointed out I hadn't received a town role in either of the previous games. I suppose the "secret" type flavor could be "you are out slutting around for hookers in the casino" or something like that. His post just brought back flashbacks of Zoraster claiming to be looking for Joffery.
David Xanatos, 227 wrote:So who do I have to vote to sheep Fate?
Are you really so lazy that you aren't going to read the thread and you won't even ISO Fate to determine onto whom to sheep? This is a terrible post with the explicit intention of desiring to tell the players you are sheeping Fate (again).
Bogre, 266 wrote:1. You're attempting to build a case on reading into my motivations, and fallaciously suggesting I listed suspicions as an 'out' for voting someone else. That doesn't work. You need to realize that townies will have a pool of players they'd like to lynch, generally ordered based on scumminess, and a much larger pool of players they'd be unsure or unwilling to lynch. Scum players have a small group they're unwilling to lynch, and a large group (everyone not their team) that they'd be willing to lynch, and MORE EQUALLY willing to just kill one of them.
It isn't this simple as scum have a small pool they are not willing to lynch since they have to not only appear to be willing to lynch but also actually be willing to lynch people inside their team.
Bogre, 266 wrote:I present my counter thoughts to the town:
Blackberry is highly unwilling to commit. To wagons, to voting other people, and lets other people lead.
He pays a lot of attention to people's emotions and seems to seek tacit approval from the voting behind the aforementioned lead of others.
I find the lack of actual defense lacking and the amount of player discrediting disturbing.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Bogre
David is also doing a nice job of
not posting any content other than buddying up to the most vocal person in the game.
