Why is this a scumtell?
Killjoy, I assume this is your first game. What brought you to Mafiascum? Do you have other experience with mafia?
In post 18, monk wrote:
I set a trap, I didn't think you'd be the one to set it off, disappointing empking
VOTE: Empking
In post 21, whispersilk wrote:VOTE: Friend
Because he is opportunistic.
This vote is subject to change once I understand what just happened while I was trying to post.
In post 23, Whiskers wrote:Fuck I am falling down all of these stairs.
I missed RVS!
IT KEEPS.
HAPPENING!
No, you don't lynch trap setters, traps are inherently pro-town.
VOTE: Whispersilk.
I fucking hate vote tags, can I just use bold?
Goddamn ninjas.
UNVOTE: Whispersilk
VOTE: pseudonymous
In post 35, whispersilk wrote:
Personally, I don't think there is anything wrong with changing your vote during RVS, because it elicits reactions from people as it did in this case. monk has no reason to claim it was a trap, other than it really was a trap. Empking reacted and used it as a reason to vote for monk. I don't like that. Friend used it as a reason to vote for monk too. I don't like that either.
monk wrote:I set a trap, I didn't think you'd be the one to set it off, disappointing empking
Yeah, you can stop that right now. Just because I don't reply to you instantly doesn't mean I'm ignoring you, so don't try to paint it that way because it's hella scummy.
In post 18, monk wrote:
I set a trap, I didn't think you'd be the one to set it off, disappointing empking
VOTE: Empking
In post 36, Friend wrote:
I don't think there is either. You're misunderstanding my position. I think it's scummy that instead of saying "there's nothing wrong with changing your vote in RVS, it's not a big deal, calm down" he said "LOL it was a trap Empking I've caught you as scum." It makes no sense unless he's nervous about his play, which I find scummy. Town have no reason to be nervous.
In post 95, Ashblade wrote:
Pseudo is meh, his stance seems to be what TK would like to call fence-sitting (btw TK where the hell are you. ) for saying he doesn't like stuff but only minor nitpicks and staying off with any votes.
whispers is my current favorite scumpick. She's getting seriously flustered over semantics. The entire fight was... semantics. blah blah 'twist words' really it didn't make much of a difference anyway and I just don't see why it was that big of deal that he said it that way, yeah maybe it was a little much but I imagined the same kind of thing when I read that post the first time.
monk/whisper partners? I'd buy it.
Now for whisper.
In post 52, Ashblade wrote:Apparently everyone hates candy here. Meh.
UNVOTE:
I also didn't realize we were playing trap mafia otherwise I would have taken my Yu-Gi-Oh cards with me, right now all I have is a Reverse Trap in Wriggle.
Anyway...
In post 27, monk wrote:Two objectives, find opportunistic scum, end rvs. Empking decided I was scum from the littlest thing lets go
Scummy does not always equal scum, your trap was bad and poorly placed 'traps' catch townies just as much as scum. Your reaction to this just adds more to the pile.
In post 29, Hiraki wrote:Monk isn't scum due to join date.
I doubt it, pretty sure it would go either way at the moment.
Emp is slight town, monk is null to newish and Whiskers looks fluffy,
edit: and whispers isn't reading Friend.
VOTE: whisper
In post 105, Thirdkoopa wrote:
Friend: Originally I was having a pretty good TownRead but I feel like I need to see more interactions for this to solidify. The case on Ash seemed pretty opportunistic, not for that, but Friend, why did you say that you don't think Whispersilk is scum when you had your vote on Monk during your switch?
Whiskers wrote:So, ThirdKoopa, just to make sure I understand correctly, your reads are:
Friend - Null
Whisper - Null
Monk - Null
and
Pseudo - Null.
Right?
...Oh, and
Ash - Null.
In post 92, Pseudonymous wrote:In post 88, Hiraki wrote:
THANKS FOR THE INSIGHT BROOOOOOOIn post 86, Pseudonymous wrote:Heh...traps...heh.
You're quite welcome.
Some of this looks pretty silly. Monk changes his vote, which prompts Empking to change his vote to Monk, causing Monk to vote Empking for falling into his "trap," which Friend goes along with. Whisper then votes Friend for being opportunistic, and then Whiskers votes Whisper for voting trap-setters, and then me just cause.
You can't take much of that seriously. I can't really see Monk's or Empking's actions as scummy. Actually, I can't see them as anything more than silliness. Now, reading through this, Friend doesn't come off too well. Not necessarily the alleged word-twisting, but I don't get a good feeling from him.