Mini 1238 - One After the Other - Over!

[Twistedspoon]

Mod: VoteCount por favor

I'll put a VC up since one has been requested (as backup mod)

Whispersilk - Hiraki (1)
Zdenek - Killjoy, Mute, Monk, empking, Whiskers (5)
Pseudonymous - Friend (1)
Mute - Zdenek (1)

Not voting:

Koopa, Pseudonymous, whispersilk, Ashblade (4)

It's 7 to lynch as that's the number total players/2 +1 whilst an even number of players are alive

this makes Zdenek on L-2, Mute, Pseudo and Whisper on L-6 and everyone else on L-7

[Friend]

Honestly, I don't find Zdenek all that scummy.

What is the case on him?

Also Pseudonymous seems to be continually flying under the radar. Why isn't there more pressure on this dude?

[Empking]

Also Pseudonymous seems to be continually flying under the radar. Why isn't there more pressure on this dude?

We haven't got to him yet. Simple as that.

[Whiskers]

The attempt to call two of the scum team on day one and on page seven for terrible reasons is faking content and attempting to appear useful - it's pointless because of how likely it is to be wrong (in this case, I know she is wrong).

But, you know, it's okay on page five-- in your first post of the game.

Vote ashblade

Pseudo is also scum.

[Friend]

Uh, he needs to be gotten to.

[Whiskers]

Yes; tomorrow?

[Zdenek]

Whiskers, is there anything in particular in Mute's post that you would like me to respond to?

Team hunting and having two suspects is different.

[Thirdkoopa]

Hi there; I've been very busy (Which the entirety of September 8th and 10th was spent celebrating my birthday) but I'll be able to respond to everything later tonight.

[Whiskers]

What post of Mute's are you referring to?

Also, I jsut noticed that Friend is pushing for a Pseudo wagon (lurker wagon) and Zdenek's first post also said Pseudo was scum, AND Friend is against the Zdenek wagon. Trying to break up the Scumwagon for lurkerhunting? cool beans, man.

[Zdenek]

What post of Mute's are you referring to?

Post 221

[Whiskers]

That post is so fucking confusing I don't even know who said what. It looks like bold allthrougought, and then at the end there's bold responding to the bold.

But I"m not going to tutor you-- Yes, I think you should respond to it. I think it would be good. Of course, if you're scum, the more you say, the more likely you are to out oyur partner.

[Zdenek]

That post is so fucking confusing I don't even know who said what. It looks like bold allthrougought, and then at the end there's bold responding to the bold.

But I"m not going to tutor you-- Yes, I think you should respond to it. I think it would be good. Of course, if you're scum, the more you say, the more likely you are to out oyur partner.

I think that post is just scum garbage and I'm not going to respond to it point by point. I figured that since you're voting me for not responding to it, there'd be something there that you actually thought warranted a response.

[Whiskers]

You're being uncooperative. While that's technically playing toward your win condition, mafia generally wants to blend in and look good. Also, Mute is not blathering, nor do I believe him to be scum. Your scumflip will strengthen that read.

[Whiskers]

Furthermore, I'm also voting you for this:

Vote ashblade

Pseudo is also scum.

For this,

Is there a miller in the game?

and for this:

So Ashblade's motivations aren't townie in the least.

Just look at his reads and notice that he doesn't say what he thinks about TK and Pseudo, two people actually guilty of reasonable scum tells (laziness and fencesitting), and decided to put a pressure vote on Monk.

Lynch him now please.

Yeah, but ashblade doesn't look scummy. Ashblade is Not Scum.

Okay

Unvote
Vote Empking

What? Way to change your reads? Way to stay firm in your beliefs? Let me rephrase this all:
"Hey, I think Ashblade is scum, here are some good reasons for it [reasons]."
"I think you're wrong."
"Oh man, I better move my vote then."
Planting your suspicion for laaaater? Why did you even move your vote here?

Oh, and this:

I started isoing him with the intent to find scummy stuff to lynch, but Ash has probvided content on EVERY post so far.

Silly me for thinking that you had a real reason.

So what are you going to do with this information?

Keep it in mind.

That's lame. I suppose it was a loaded question, but really. Oop, and this:

Whiskers is very likely town just for saying that she wants to lynch Monk because of something that is happening in another game.

You need to get out more, bro. Even if this wasn't me playing against wincon, it's

at best

a null-tell to have a grudge against another player. Also, it's a bad reason to vote somepony. Scum wants bad, random lynches, so maybe a bad, random vote isn't pro-town?
And you're scummy for suggesting it is a town read.

Meh. There are others, too, that I could point out or make a big deal over, but you've been caught. Keep reading during the rest of the game and keep eyes out for ways to improve.

[Zdenek]

Ashblade - I agreed with Friend's observation about him and voted. Pseudo is also obviously scummy.

Changing my vote from Ashblade at your request was for a good reason that I see no pro-town reason to share.

I've seen that town-tell work in the past and I'm applying it again. I am not saying that it was pro-town action at all, but that it is something that scum are unlikely to do.

[Whiskers]

TBH, you sound like me in my early games when I was caught-town.
UNVOTE: Zdenek

[Friend]

Whiskers, stick that vote on Pseudo. It's for the greater good.

[monk]

mod: could we get a prod on pseudonymous

I think I see your case on pseudonymous Friend, but what differentiates him from Third Koopa who you say has very fluffy posts here

[Friend]

ThirdKoopa vote is not bad, but he's being less blatant than pseudo.

[Whiskers]

Like... he's sneakier? He posts fluff but makes you think it's info...?

monk and pseudo are buddies?

pseudo only has three posts, Friend. why the fuck are you so pushing on his wagon? Why? Why why why?

[monk]

Whiskers, why are you linking me with Pseudo?

[Whiskers]

"[thoughtbubble]Man, he's going down, otta get a prod on him pronto before he comes under serious pressure/suspicion.[/thoughtbubble] Hey Friend, don't you think this

OTHER

guy is even MORE scummy?"

Just pointing it out. Not anything to vote over. But good you asked.

[monk]

uh huh, misrep city there.

[Whiskers]

Sure.

But that's what I saw in it, and that's what I was referring to when you asked me what I meant.

[monk]

so getting him to tell me why he's differentiated ThirdKoopa and pseudonymous is me playing buddy to pseudonymous ok