Mini 1238 - One After the Other - Over!

Friend · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 5:53 am

Guys, if the Ashblade wagon is I guess just not going on anymore, how do you feel about a Pseudonymous wagon?

If you read his ISO, it's 3 posts of nothing but fence-sitting and basic game "plot summary." I mean look at this...

In post 92, Pseudonymous wrote:
In post 88, Hiraki wrote:

In post 86, Pseudonymous wrote:Heh...traps...heh.
THANKS FOR THE INSIGHT BROOOOOOO

You're quite welcome.

Some of this looks pretty silly. Monk changes his vote, which prompts Empking to change his vote to Monk, causing Monk to vote Empking for falling into his "trap," which Friend goes along with. Whisper then votes Friend for being opportunistic, and then Whiskers votes Whisper for voting trap-setters, and then me just cause.

You can't take much of that seriously. I can't really see Monk's or Empking's actions as scummy. Actually, I can't see them as anything more than silliness. Now, reading through this, Friend doesn't come off too well. Not necessarily the alleged word-twisting, but I don't get a good feeling from him.

Total IIoA.

UNVOTE: Ashblade
VOTE: Pseudonymous

Whiskers · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:59 am

He needs to vote more, I'll give you that.

Meransiel · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:06 am

Vote Count 1.3

fap fap fap fap

Monk - Empking (1)
Ashblade - monk (1)
Whispersilk - Hiraki (1)
Empking -

Zdenek

(1)

Zdenek

- Killjoy, Mute (2)
Pseudonymous - Friend (1)

Not voting:

Koopa

, Pseudonymous, whispersilk, Whiskers, Ashblade (5)

Some random people that I don't really care about V/LA for some time

Deadline is September 28, at any hour I feel like it.

Empking · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:40 am

In post 177, Meransiel wrote:Zdenek - Killjoy, Mute (1)

?

(The vote count as a whole is ridiculous though. Wagon people!)

Meransiel · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:48 am

That is me denying Killjoy's existence as a person.

monk · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:07 pm

In post 176, Whiskers wrote:He needs to vote more, I'll give you that.

*looks at where whiskers vote is*

It looks to me like you're trying to avoid suspicion on yourself, by having a vote out there which when called on it you withdrew and then calling people out for not voting.

Whiskers · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:14 pm

Where is my vote? I don't even remember right now.

Oh.
Eh, IDK, I don't want to blindly sheep Friend. I mean, yeah, sure, it's usually a good thing to do, but you can't do it all the time. I have a twon read on Ash, and meh on the rest. Whispersilk is nullscum, Zdenek I wasn't really paying attention to until somepony suggested dualing wagons, and Pseudo may be scum, since friend is voting her.

Zdenek · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:27 pm

How about we wagon Empking who's nitpicking over RVS actions and avoiding this thread while posting elsewhere.

Empking · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:29 pm

I posted like literally less than two hours ago.

What have I been avoiding?

(Alse "LOLTRAP" is still the scummierst thing that's happened. Everything else is just nitpicking.)

Zdenek · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:32 pm

Prior to that post, you hadn't posted in this game in something like two days, while posting elsewhere on the site.

Empking · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:34 pm

In post 183, Empking wrote:What have I been avoiding?

Whiskers · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:35 pm

There isn't much to say? IDK though, 'cause empking usually has a useless, unexplained list of reads by now.

[preedit] According to Zden, THIS GAME.

Zdenek · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:35 pm

In post 185, Empking wrote:
In post 183, Empking wrote:What have I been avoiding?

Posting in this thread.

Empking · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:36 pm

In post 186, Whiskers wrote:There isn't much to say? IDK though, 'cause empking usually has a useless, unexplained list of reads by now.

Link please.

Empking · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:38 pm

If Zdenek cannoty give a specific reason why I would be avoiding this thread at this moment then look at this post from anoher game: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 9#p3355849

Hiraki · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:39 pm

Whiskers.

You're starting to annoy me.

Please stop doing whatever you may be doing.

Zdenek · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:46 pm

In post 189, Empking wrote:If Zdenek cannoty give a specific reason why I would be avoiding this thread at this moment then look at this post from anoher game: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 9#p3355849

Overall rate is irrelevant. It has do with the fact that you hadn't posted here; additionally, the period of inactivity followed me voting you.

Empking · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:52 pm

In post 191, Zdenek wrote:
In post 189, Empking wrote:If Zdenek cannoty give a specific reason why I would be avoiding this thread at this moment then look at this post from anoher game: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 9#p3355849

Overall rate is irrelevant. It has do with the fact that you hadn't posted here;

So you don't care whether or not its a scumtell? It was just convenient to mention?

If my going a day without posting is not a scumtell why is it worth bringing up?

Zdenek · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:59 pm

I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.

I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.

Empking · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:00 pm

In post 193, Zdenek wrote:I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.

I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.

Why?
Why did this "especially if it occurs after someone votes them" come so belatedly?

Mute · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:02 pm

In post 193, Zdenek wrote:I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.

I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.

...

are you serious?

Zdenek · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:07 pm

In post 194, Empking wrote:
In post 193, Zdenek wrote:I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.

I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.

Why?
Why did this "especially if it occurs after someone votes them" come so belatedly?

Because scum lurk to avoid pressure.
I don't think it came late.

Zdenek · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:08 pm

In post 195, Mute wrote:
In post 193, Zdenek wrote:I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.

I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.

...
are you serious?

I asked you a question earlier, what about my post about Killjoy did you find fluffy?

Empking · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:11 pm

In post 196, Zdenek wrote:
In post 194, Empking wrote:
In post 193, Zdenek wrote:I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.

I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.

Why?
Why did this "especially if it occurs after someone votes them" come so belatedly?

Because scum lurk to avoid pressure.
I don't think it came late.

It came in your fourth post on this subject + after your post responding to me asking you what I was avoiding.

Mute · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:23 pm

In post 197, Zdenek wrote:
In post 195, Mute wrote:
In post 193, Zdenek wrote:I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.

I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.

...
are you serious?

I asked you a question earlier, what about my post about Killjoy did you find fluffy?

You mean this?

In post 167, Mute wrote:..wow that took all of 10 minutes.

Vote Zdenek

Nothing substantial from this guy.

Zdenek wrote:Killjoy could very well be scum after that long post she just made. She defends Monk as town just because of his join date, which of course doesn't stop people from drawing scum. To me this claim looks like buddying with Hiraki for voicing a similar thought earlier. Attack on Whiskers for vote switching is weak. The attempt to call two of the scum team on day one and on page seven for terrible reasons is faking content and attempting to appear useful - it's pointless because of how likely it is to be wrong
(in this case, I know she is wrong)
.

All of this? I wipe my bum with better fluff than this.
His first(ish) post asking for millers? Yeah not liking it.

Whiskers and Empking are my stronger town-reads, and I've my eye on Friend. Everyone else is in the middle.

The bold was the only thing of use from your post. How are you sure of that?
also:

Zdenek wrote:How about we wagon Empking who's nitpicking over RVS actions and avoiding this thread while posting elsewhere.

there's nothing, I feel, inherently scummy about not posting in a game thread unless it gets to where (1) they require constant prodding, (2) the [few] posts they have lack substance, and (3) they give no input of their own.
unless I'm mistaken.