Mini 1241: Lab Mafia (Game Over)

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:58 pm

Random vote: Charter

...

Really is random,

I'm not entirely sure if we were supposed to confirm our roles or not ...

Guess we'll find out.

Nice seeing you in a game again Internet Stranger.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 10:03 am

I love wasabi ..

UNVOTE: Charter

VOTE: Internet stranger for lurking.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #19 (isolation #2) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:49 pm

UNVOTE: Internet Stranger

Just wanted to grasp your attention is all.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #21 (isolation #3) » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:10 pm

In post 15, charter wrote:
Vote Nanook
because I've met him in real life!

It took a minute for me to realize, but I can actually picture the face now. Had some fun times at the beach bash.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #29 (isolation #4) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:01 am

Again, the vote was only to rustle IS's feathers. Consider it a facebook poke.

It's day 1 at the start of the game and I don't see anything wrong with wanting to have a pretty weak reasoning behind a vote at this stage. I know it wasn't random, but nothing else was being said and I did see IS on the site. I'm not going to hold that against him though ... He addressed my 'concern'.

Fenix, I don't know how I didn't see this off the bat, maybe I thought it was a joke. Was that post real?

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #31 (isolation #5) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:27 am

No it wasn't serious. The fact that IS was lurking is serious, but again just wanted to poke at IS. Lurking isn't enough of a reason for a lynch this early in the game especially.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #33 (isolation #6) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:42 am

I just want him Fenix to confirm it's authenticity. I've seen players make subtle comments as such to just to say later that they were just kidding. If it is real, I feel it's a pretty dumb move to make this early in the game and don't see what possessed him to make the announcement.

Wasabi? Is that choice based off from this game, or previous game play. I'm not familiar with him.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #40 (isolation #7) » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:03 am

Yeah I don't quite understand the vote from El simo either. I did remove my vote prior to him voting me as well. Voting me for a weak argument is exactly the same thing I did with IS. I'd be more concerned though if more players piled on.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #59 (isolation #8) » Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:24 am

In post 46, -L- wrote:-Nanook unvoted far too quickly once confronted. Why did you unvote so quickly? How did benefit your goal of "ruffling feathers"? Did it not release pressure from your target, thus invalidating your goal?

I unvoted so quickly because I didn't want to lynch IS. I simply wanted him to post something. I only picked on IS instead of some other player lurking around because I've played with IS in the past, and in the moment felt like teasing him. The goal to ruffling IS's feathers was to make him post ... Of course it released pressure when I unvoted. IS wasn't still lurking though. HE POSTED! ... Just saying. So no, my goal was not invalidated.

Third party roles suck .. If anything though I guess it helps to know now that the jester is lingering in the mix.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #67 (isolation #9) » Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:44 pm

^ I'm interested in hearing 4nxi3ty's response as well.

Mod: Please consider that starting friday evening I will have limited access until tuesday. I will do my best to check in from time to time as internet access is available ... My time however will be tied up in work.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #80 (isolation #10) » Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:11 am

In post 76, 4nxi3ty wrote:Your vote is not retalitory tho considering it is a couple pages too late. In other news Nanook, L, and Garuru are charged with suspicion of rolefishing.

I wouldn't be 'rolefishin' if it weren't for certain players claiming on the first day of the game without any reason ...

Fenix states he was kidding, and you appear to be serious.

Either way I don't see how it can benefit the game this early to announce the fact that you have a daykill. If I had such an ability I would keep that to myself and use it at a time I felt it was needed. That's me though.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #92 (isolation #11) » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:41 am

In post 91, Fenix wrote:
In post 89, charter wrote:El simo is probscum too. Still talking about Jesters.
In post 85, charter wrote:There doesn't need to be any more talk about Jesters

Do you have anything else to add? Because it appears you're just saying that repeatedly to look like you're discussing things with the rest of us.

VOTE: charter

VOTE: Fenix

The fake claim didn't bother me much in the beginning, but then I recalled the lynch all liars method. I'm good for an 4nxi3ty or Fenix lynch at this point.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #94 (isolation #12) » Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:39 am

In post 93, Fenix wrote:So your reasoning is metagame -_-

Well, it's either that or we follow RBTs suggestion,

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #157 (isolation #13) » Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:47 am

VOTE: 4nxi3ty

Not liking the dodging of questions. Voting without explanation. Fake role claiming. Oh, and the one line posts (more of a bonus if he's lynched).

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #159 (isolation #14) » Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:59 am

In post 158, chkflip wrote:So my one line posts aren't as horrible... or what?

They're just as annoying. Although after I made my last one, I can see why they are well liked.

In regards to Fenix, I still find the fake claiming out of the gate like that scummy. Why lie?

I'm undecided really between Fenix and 4nxi3ty, but 4nxi3ty just keeps adding fuel to my fire with his posting.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #162 (isolation #15) » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:33 am

In post 161, Maxous wrote:Nanook - nothing about [L]?

Nothing at all?

Is there something in particular that you wanted to know.

[L] appears townie to me if that's what you are getting at. I'm not really sure why she's being voted for.

IS states because of the questions [L] was asking, attempt to strong to appear town.
4nxi3ty because maxous stated she's town.
Wasabi because of the "why am I scum" question.

I don't agree with those reasons.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #202 (isolation #16) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:10 pm

In post 182, 4nxi3ty wrote:Srry i've been a bit lazy with this game.

L, nanook, and el simo are scum.

will explain why when i have the time.

Have any time yet? ... Just curious.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #207 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:57 am

In post 203, el simo wrote:So I'm going to go ahead and call L and Nanook as scum.

Nanook for obvious reasons, his weak unvote, his opportunistic lynch all liars push, and he was on both the Fenix wagon and now the easy lynch Anxiety wagon.
Anxiety is the easy lynch wagon? I'm sorry, but could you tell me what about Anxiety makes him appear town? Was it the fake claim? Dodging of questions? ... What? I'm just curious

Out of L's posts, only one of his posts doesn't have a pointless question or two, and that post was about the questions anyway! Quite a clear attempt to look like he is participating. You can tell these questions aren't authentic because he doesn't concern himself when some of them were answered and instead just ignores them. Also pushing the Anxiety wagon hoorah!

Interestingly enough, Nanook refuses to vote L because she appears townie while pushing Anxietys easy lynch with L.
L also Nanook asked some pretty pressing questions, but proceeded to do nothing with the answers.

I don't understand the underlined. Who asked what questions pertaining to who? As far as I know any questions geared at me, I've answered. If I haven't then please point them out
Coaching? If I were to stab at a third partner I'd say it was Garuru based purely on the similarities between L and Nooks interactions and L and Gururus interactions. Questions them rather seriously, doesn't state suspicion and doesn't follow them up.
Are you saying that I don't follow up on suspicion? I don't know how many times it needs to be said, but the voting for IS strictly was a poke at IS. I knew it would grasp his attention. I'm not carrying out a vote on someone strictly for lurking and if you find me scummy for that, then so be it.
Certainly not a damning tell but it will be very telling when their roles flip.
Appears opportunistic on your part

I'm fine with either of their lynches, but seeing as no one wants to bite into Nanook,
vote: [L]
.
So, since no one else will bite you're going to take the easy wagon? Isn't that what you're accusing me of doing? I on the other hand have my vote on Anxiety as he is so obviously lying about his role. There was no need for him to claim, the same goes for Fenix. Again, I would vote to lynch either player this day.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #212 (isolation #18) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:32 am

In post 208, 4nxi3ty wrote:sorta prod dodging.

@mod, nanook had a bolded 'vote:L' in his post, does that count as a vote?

Yeah, that wasn't a vote from me ...

Sorta? You are dodging.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #215 (isolation #19) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:41 am

In post 123, Maxous wrote:
Wheter or not you agree it was a smart move, there was an explained(and rather obvious) motive for Fenix to 'lie' as you were. Just stating lynch all liars looks opportunistic here. I am more inclined to beleive town would not use that reasoning.
If you believe Fenix is scum trying to use some kind of reverse psychology I would like to read why.

What was the explained or obvious motive behind Fenix's 'lie'?

I can't see why town would want to lie about having a one time vig ability. I think scum would be dumb for doing the same. I just don't get why people feel that they have to play as such. Call me old school if you want, but the breed of players I was used to playing with played quite differently then those who play now. It's an issue I have to deal with, but calling me scum because I question it is absurd from my view point.

I don't see the point in lying about having a one time vig ability. Your answer could be to stir up conversation, or to look for others questioning it.

So in conclusion, I guess I just plainly think that it's dumb on for either party to do so. It sure is hell isn't pro active, so I can't see why a town player would want to use it. All that is WIFOM anyways, because for all you know, Fenix could be scum trying to appear town by making such a dumb move knowing in the back of his head that others would cross it off as ignorance.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #246 (isolation #20) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:35 pm

Did a quick read on Maxous .. The only person that she voted was myself, ... Not sure why she was targetted.

VOTE: 4nxi3ty

My thoughts haven't changed much. He appears to want to be lynched, so why not lynch him?

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #272 (isolation #21) » Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:49 am

@ El simo - First I'm scum because I removed a vote and placed it on IS as a gentle poke. Then I'm scum because I took the 'easy' road yesterday by voting for Anxiety instead of L. You make the statement that L and I are scum, L obviously is not.

Maybe you should rethink some things.

I'll gather some more stuff later this evening after work. This tunneling crap is just getting old.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #325 (isolation #22) » Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:17 pm

Posting to avoid replacement ... Be back later.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #333 (isolation #23) » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:23 pm

Yeah, not much has changed in regards to who I'd like to be lynched.

You can say that I'm tunneling, ...

Whatever floats your boat. I'm not seeing the case on IS. Fenix has increased on the scumdar though. Could be scum or sk, so not bad for another option.

I just feel in my gut that 4nxi3ty's actions throughout this game have been nothing more than dodgy. He needs to die.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #337 (isolation #24) » Sat Oct 08, 2011 9:02 am

In post 335, 4nxi3ty wrote:i want detailed reads of internet stranger from charter, rbt, and nanook... thank you in advance.

Well, considering that you have still yet taken the time to explain why you have a scum read on me ... well, i'll let you figure out my answer to that request.

Also, you made a comment that IS was scum and that you would explain later as to why. Still waiting for that explanation. You even voted for him without adding a reason in the post. Why others can't see this non-sense is beyond me.

Maybe I'm missing something.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #364 (isolation #25) » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:13 am

In post 349, charter wrote:
Unvote, vote Stranger

Next best thing to Fenix.

The bit with Fenix didn't bother me so much. Jumping on IS like he did just appeared planned. Earlier in the game he mentioned that IS may be Fenix's scum partner. Called IS probscum. Then voted IS because "He's the next best thing instead of Fenix".

The above was paraphrased, but you get the point.

I don't think Charter ever really has explained WHY he find IS to be scum, which is a very similar problem in relation to 4nxi3ty.

The dodgy behavior with the one liners isn't much useful right now either, so ...

I could be down for a VOTE: Charter

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #369 (isolation #26) » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:58 am

In post 368, charter wrote:
In post 364, NanookTheWolf wrote:
In post 349, charter wrote:
Unvote, vote Stranger

Next best thing to Fenix.

The bit with Fenix didn't bother me so much. Jumping on IS like he did just appeared planned. Earlier in the game he mentioned that IS may be Fenix's scum partner. Called IS probscum. Then voted IS because "He's the next best thing instead of Fenix".

The above was paraphrased, but you get the point.

I don't think Charter ever really has explained WHY he find IS to be scum, which is a very similar problem in relation to 4nxi3ty.

The dodgy behavior with the one liners isn't much useful right now either, so ...

I could be down for a VOTE: Charter

So you know what you just did? You just threw together a one liner and voted me for it. Pot meet kettle. You know who else has done this? Everyone voting me. So all of you just say hello to each other.

One liner or not, at least it includes my reasoning. Plus your one liners are a bit more literal. You dodge questions directed at you or just plain don't answer them.

I've never played a game with you before either on the site, so I don't know if it's your style necessarily or not. I know that the one person who's style that I'm come to accustomed to is playing similarily in regards to one liners.

So you can throw me in the mix if you want, but I still don't think that voting for someone without an explanation (One liner or not) is all that helpful.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #388 (isolation #27) » Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:18 am

In post 387, Riceballtail wrote:I'm basically (only because of the kill flavor) confirmed town through Wasabi's claim. I'll be going last.

You're not confirmed ... we're not even sure that the scum in this game have guns considering the eating flavour in the death scenes.

I'll go when asked.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #391 (isolation #28) » Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:39 pm

In post 390, charter wrote:Where the hell did RBT claim at?

RBT didn't claim. Wasabi was the town gunsmith and found that RBT didn't have a gun when he checked her out.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #410 (isolation #29) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:43 pm

In post 406, 4nxi3ty wrote:nanook, claim pls?

Townie here.

In post 409, el simo wrote:I'd still like to lynch Nanook plz.

Then why not vote me?

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #444 (isolation #30) » Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:27 am

Unofficial Vote Count

1. el simo
2. charter - IS
7. Riceballtail - Elsimo
8. Fenix
9. 4nxi3ty
10. NanookTheWolf
11. Internet Stranger - 4nxi3ty, RBT, Fenix

Not Voting:charter, NanookTheWolf

With Seven Alive its Four to Lynch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I posted the above just to see where we're at ..

Right now IS is at L - 1, I'm not really gunhoe to support the lynch however as the three players on it haven't exactly been town reads of mine throughout the game.

I understand El simo's frustration with RBT, but I don't think voting for her will change her logic at all. Obviously she's wrong about being confirmed, but I don't feel that's enough for a lynch in her particular scenario.

I haven't really cared for Fenix since the fake claim, and the same applies to 4nxi3ty.

Since there aren't any votes on Fenix or 4nxi3ty, I'll go back to VOTE: charter.

Charter b/c I find it quite strange that someone who's been pressing for IS's lynch is not voting for IS today. He did yesterday, but has held off. I guess the same could be said about my vote today, however I haven't really been pressing for anyone today either. I've got a lot of things going on right now in my real life and just haven't had the same devotion to this game, for that I apologize.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #456 (isolation #31) » Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:25 pm

In post 455, charter wrote:Your play definitely backs that up.

That's a bit rude ... don't you think?

You can vote who you want, hammer or not.

For the record though, you're still dodging scum.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #459 (isolation #32) » Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:41 pm

In post 458, Internet Stranger wrote:Also. I find it odd that scum hasn't hammered me yet.

Maybe that's b/c the scum are on your wagon already ...

Or ...

Maybe charter is trying to gain some townie points by prolonging your lynch.

Guess we'll have to wait and see.

May I just make the statement that posting from my cell phone is truly a great feature that I'm learning to love.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #496 (isolation #33) » Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:46 am

^^^

Could that be deleted please?

GO SCUM!