Prozacs Basic Theme 3 - GAME OVER

scooby · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:14 pm

Is this better now DRAMONIC?

In post 770, scooby wrote:How THE FUCK am I xvart's buddy?

Nocmen, you better start making sense because I'm not liking anything recent from you.

Dramonic OTOH just become CONFIRMED SCUM.

In post 604, trekker wrote:dramonic, why did you kill him?

Lol at (any kind of anitown role) thinking trekker had information regarding dramonic.

VOTE: DRAMONIC

dramonic · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:18 pm

...
The person Trekker accuses me of killing.
And the way Trekker died...
Are clearly from different sources.
Let's assume for a second mafia killed Trekker to frame me. Since trekker flipped VT, his accusation on me had no founding and thus cannot be used as any form of evidence against me.

No, your argument is still awful.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:19 pm

Luuuuuuuuuulllllllllll

Nocmen · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:22 pm

scooby:

Previously, you made pretty good arguments on players. The first one that rubbed me wrong was the joining on the myko wagon early D2. Since then, everything seems like neutral, trying to go with what you can, especially with the vote on xvart, where you don't see it, you ISO him, and suddenly decide he's scummy enough to lynch.

Also, claims to be scumhunting. Again, this happened earlier, but near the end of yesterday, it seemed more like hes just fending off any attack of a vote or two.

However, the more I look into it, I'm willing to make a compromise, and go after dramonic too. Depending on whether he can stop the BS games and straighforward tell us what he knows.

And if it takes a wagon to get that out of him, fine:

Unvote, Vote: Dramonic

dramonic · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:23 pm

...I beg your pardon?

Nocmen · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:32 pm

Your reply, even before trekker's flip. You didn't disbelieve it, or produce a vote. You basically alluded to having targeted one of the people who died N1. How trekker knew this, I don't know now. But that response...is off.

dramonic · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:34 pm

...It's called a joke.

Fate · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:38 pm

LOL masons are still alive

Vote: BUNNY

Since the FUCK OF A VIG/SK can't follow directions.

Masons are still alive=I decide lynch.

Bunny dies.

Katsuki · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:42 pm

VOTE: BUNNY

scooby · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:00 pm

BUNNY IS TOWN.

Bunnylover · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:01 pm

YEAH FATE THE "MASON" DECIDES TO LYNCH TODAY:

Vote: Bunnylover

.........
Oh wait, but I'm not scum.

Unvote

Oh just wait Fate, I'll find out if your telling the truth or not <3.

scooby · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:03 pm

In post 776, dramonic wrote:...
The person Trekker accuses me of killing.
And the way Trekker died...
Are clearly from different sources.
Let's assume for a second mafia killed Trekker to frame me. Since trekker flipped VT, his accusation on me had no founding and thus cannot be used as any form of evidence against me.

No, your argument is still awful.

No.

A random guy who wasn't CONSIDERED TOWN by anyone "BREADCRUMBS" information implicating you. It doesn't matter if he was gambitting or not. Antitown players had no way to know this.

That random guy misteriously dies on the night.

The fact that he flipped VT has NOTHING TO DO with the reason why he was killed, which is VERY LIKELY that scum thought he was a POWER ROLE.

scooby · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:04 pm

I don't know what makes Bunny scum in this situation when SHE HAS ALREADY SEEN FATE FAKECLAIM MASON BEFORE.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:11 pm

I will look at the game tomorrow afternoon. Right now I have errands to run.

dramonic · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:15 pm

In post 786, scooby wrote:
In post 776, dramonic wrote:...
The person Trekker accuses me of killing.
And the way Trekker died...
Are clearly from different sources.
Let's assume for a second mafia killed Trekker to frame me. Since trekker flipped VT, his accusation on me had no founding and thus cannot be used as any form of evidence against me.

No, your argument is still awful.

No.

A random guy who wasn't CONSIDERED TOWN by anyone "BREADCRUMBS" information implicating you. It doesn't matter if he was gambitting or not. Antitown players had no way to know this.

That random guy misteriously dies on the night.

The fact that he flipped VT has NOTHING TO DO with the reason why he was killed, which is VERY LIKELY that scum thought he was a POWER ROLE.

So how does that implicate me then?
Scum thought he was a power-role. Just because he fakecrumbed against me doesnt make me scum =_=

Oman · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:27 pm

In post 767, dramonic wrote:why doesnt it make sense to you Oman?

Because after those kills I don't buy either you or scooby as scum. I thought he and nocmen had this thing going on but it doesn't makes sense after trekker.

David Xanatos · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:30 pm

VOTE: Katsuki

Getting bad vibes about fakeclaim potential. Katsuki less valuable as Town than Fate.

Katsuki · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:11 pm

In post 791, David Xanatos wrote:VOTE: Katsuki

Getting bad vibes about fakeclaim potential. Katsuki less valuable as Town than Fate.

What is this fakeclaim potential you speak of? I'm rather curious.

David Xanatos · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:21 pm

UNVOTE:

The one that appears when I get people completely confused. Thought you were the one Fate claimed Masons with for a moment. >_<

Banshee · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:26 pm

In post 770, scooby wrote:How THE FUCK am I xvart's buddy?

Nocmen, you better start making sense because I'm not liking anything recent from you.

To me this screams Nocmen trying to buss and Scooby protesting. Notice how Nocmen then sheeps Scooby's vote on Dramonic on the very next page.

The sharp change in tone from "How the FUCK..." to "you better start making sense because I'm not liking anything recent from you" is indicative, to me, of someone who's not sincere in his argument. When I'm mad, I stay mad for more than a sentence. I don't get the calm, serene tones of a first-grade teacher dealing with a crying child one sentence later.

VOTE: Scooby

Also, if Scooby is scum then the above implicates Nocmen pretty strongly.

scooby · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:06 pm

I'm not scum, therefore I can't be protesting to Nocmen.

The change of tone is caused by the fact that:

a) I'm annoyed because people keep posting one lines without backing up their accusations. I was not directly annoyed with Nocmen.

b) Nocmen was not doing this before.

These kinds of subjective accusations can be explained with more that "insincere sequence of senteces". You should also ponder that I'm not a native speaker.

Also

In post 742, Banshee wrote:Hi everyone.
I'm still reading the game, but I'll catch up soon. Probably during night phase, since that looks imminent.

Did you manage to read the whole game before that vote?

Banshee · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:38 pm

In post 795, scooby wrote:Did you manage to read the whole game before that vote?

Yep. Thanks for asking!

What's your suspicion level of Nocmen right now? Why do you think he accused you directly of being scumbuddies with Xvart and then, when you protested, sheeped you almost immediately?

scooby · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:52 pm

It has gone to neutral to slight scummy. I can't speak for what Nocmen does but I'm thinking Nocmen is attacking dram because his reaction to trekker's gambit is off. Which is related to my case about dramonic being responsible of the trekker kill.

Re: reading the game. What are your opinions on other players? What do you think of my case against dramonic?

CSL · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:46 pm

Vote: Bunny

FoS: scooby

You aren't town.

mykonian · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:17 pm

In post 770, scooby wrote:How THE FUCK am I xvart's buddy?

Nocmen, you better start making sense because I'm not liking anything recent from you.

Dramonic OTOH just become CONFIRMED SCUM.

In post 604, trekker wrote:dramonic, why did you kill him?

Lol at scum thinking trekker had information regarding dramonic.

VOTE: DRAMONIC

In post 774, dramonic wrote:
In post 609, trekker wrote:the one that the mafia killed. i'm implying he's mafia.

Now then, once we've established there is a logical fail in that little shit attempt of Scooby, can we get back to lynching him.

So dram is seriously defending himself by claiming

"no that one wasn't the mafias kill"

?

Don't care how you did it, Trekkers dead is odd, and scooby found out why.

vote dram

Can we lynch this scum, fate? Please?