Prozacs Basic Theme 3 - GAME OVER

Nocmen · Post Post #800 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:06 am

In post 796, Banshee wrote:
In post 795, scooby wrote:Did you manage to read the whole game before that vote?

Yep. Thanks for asking!

What's your suspicion level of Nocmen right now? Why do you think he accused you directly of being scumbuddies with Xvart and then, when you protested, sheeped you almost immediately?

In post 797, scooby wrote:It has gone to neutral to slight scummy. I can't speak for what Nocmen does but I'm thinking Nocmen is attacking dram because his reaction to trekker's gambit is off. Which is related to my case about dramonic being responsible of the trekker kill.

Re: reading the game. What are your opinions on other players? What do you think of my case against dramonic?

Just as scooby said, my reaction is because dram's reaction to the entire thing (when it was first mentioned, and now) doesn't seem like a town reaction.

Oman · Post Post #801 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:20 am

Xvart's Bunnylover vote looks terrible. Fucking terrible.

Add that it's a wagon already and I'm over the moon.

Vote Bunny

TheJakalope · Post Post #802 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:07 am

Are there really people against this?

VOTE: dram

Bunnylover · Post Post #803 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:28 am

In post 801, Oman wrote:Xvart's Bunnylover vote looks terrible. Fucking terrible.

Add that it's a wagon already and I'm over the moon.

Vote Bunny

You mean my vote on Xvart
or
Xvart vote on me?

Fate · Post Post #804 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:04 am

The way you bussed xvart by sheeping the"scum masons" was so lulzy

dramonic · Post Post #805 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:07 am

No. I'm defending myself by saying Scooby is saying I would have killed Trekker because he was onto me, except the kill trekker says he saw me doing and the flavour for his death are different and the second seems to be coming from whatever other faction had a kill night 1. Pay attention.

Ellibereth · Post Post #806 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:12 am

/back from V/LA etc.

Fate · Post Post #807 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:31 am

In post 782, Fate wrote:LOL masons are still alive

Vote: BUNNY

Since the FUCK OF A VIG/SK can't follow directions.

Masons are still alive=I decide lynch.

Bunny dies.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #808 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:48 am

scooby still looks terrible, but something I caught from mykonian may actually save him:

In post 799, mykonian wrote:
In post 770, scooby wrote:How THE FUCK am I xvart's buddy?

Nocmen, you better start making sense because I'm not liking anything recent from you.

Dramonic OTOH just become CONFIRMED SCUM.

In post 604, trekker wrote:dramonic, why did you kill him?

Lol at scum thinking trekker had information regarding dramonic.

VOTE: DRAMONIC

In post 774, dramonic wrote:
In post 609, trekker wrote:the one that the mafia killed. i'm implying he's mafia.

Now then, once we've established there is a logical fail in that little shit attempt of Scooby, can we get back to lynching him.

So dram is seriously defending himself by claiming
"no that one wasn't the mafias kill"
?

Don't care how you did it, Trekkers dead is odd, and scooby found out why.
vote dram

Can we lynch this scum, fate? Please?

VOTE: dramonic

Still trying to sort out Bunnylover, but I'm not oblivious to the recent attack on him.

dramonic · Post Post #809 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:48 pm

You "caught that", SC?
It was very well hidden too!

Reading comprehension people, work it!

Nocmen · Post Post #810 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:52 pm

In post 809, dramonic wrote:You "caught that", SC?
It was very well hidden too!

Reading comprehension people, work it!

Responses like this don;t help your cause.

dramonic · Post Post #811 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:04 pm

The evidence Scooby is trying to use to incriminate me is taken completely out of context.
It's basically something like this:

Trekker says he saw me steal an apple.
The next day, Trekker is dead and his orange was stolen.

Just because you call me a fruit thief doesn't make it relevant.

dramonic · Post Post #812 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:04 pm

bad analogy, but I think it's more clear that way.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #813 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:06 pm

Dead is dead based on available information.

dramonic · Post Post #814 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:12 pm

=_=

@Mod: Is kill flavour meaningful in this game, or is it purely set at random based on your whims?

dramonic · Post Post #815 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:15 pm

Actually this isn't even relevant. Trekkers was a townie, I know I dont have a kill, thus I knew he was BSing. Why would I kill someone I know is lying?

StrangerCoug · Post Post #816 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:22 pm

To make a feeble attempt at looking like a vigilante.

dramonic · Post Post #817 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:26 pm

... Then I could just claim the kill on him, couldn't I?

StrangerCoug · Post Post #818 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:31 pm

You asked why you'd kill someone you knew was lying, didn't you?

Any two ways about it, WIFOM is not helping you.

dramonic · Post Post #819 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:35 pm

The general idea I'm trying to get accross is that who he claimed I killed and who killed him dont share flavour at all.
Furthermore, it's proven he never had any information on me.
Yet Scooby is trying to get me lynched based on that. Do you not see how that makes no sense? =S

mykonian · Post Post #820 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:15 pm

In post 811, dramonic wrote:
The next day, Trekker is dead and his orange was stolen.

and scooby saw you with an orange...

dramonic · Post Post #821 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:50 pm

Did he claim that?

Porochaz · Post Post #822 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:02 am

In post 814, dramonic wrote:=_=

@Mod: Is kill flavour meaningful in this game, or is it purely set at random based on your whims?

Flavour is there for fun, it should affect gameplay minimally.

David Xanatos · Post Post #823 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:04 am

That's a loaded answer..

Does that mean it has minor clues, or it has zero clues? Your wording suggests the first...

Porochaz · Post Post #824 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:17 am

The flavour is for fun only.