Double Vote Mafia -Mini 1239- Over

[Whiskers]

FoS: nintendoaddict

And, nintendo, don't twist my words. It's the arrogance, and the avoidance of a simple question that makes me think she's scum.

This (twisting your words) and being stupid about the rules makes NA scum.
Me refusing to answer your question makes me scum.

I'm less than impressed with both cases.

[Nobody Special]

See this? This is me not caring what you think.

[Christine]

Christine, there's no way you think they're scum together.

Have you never heard of a Gambit? If they are both scum, then they make this big deal against each other. One of them flips scum, then the other rights to End Game being cleared for tracking down scum. Seen it happen far too many times to not be suspicious of it.

[Friend Mairsil]

See this? This is me not caring what you think.

hahaha


@cristine - thats why theres normally a cop in the game to avoid situations like that

[Christine]

Why yes, yes there is, Friend. In the meantime, I will be voting for both.

[Whiskers]

Hey, Filly Maresil. We don't definitely have a cop.

Why is Nopony Special not caring what I have to say funny?

[Friend Mairsil]

its more how he said it. and while we might not have one. the odds of us having one is way higher. i mean have you ever played a game without one in it, or a way to compensate for not having one? i bet even if you have they tend to be very far spaced apart.

[Voidedmafia]

I do agree scum would try to push for a 1 for 1 if he was already going down. But I do not see AVox as scum-going-down at the moment. Most of his suspicions have been pretty warranted, and I only saw a little bit of opportunistic stuff early game. I also think AVox is more likely to be town from how Voided tried to get him lynched in a scummier-than-ever way. On top of that, Voided's recent posts have been, "Yup, gonna agree with what killer says!" There's a good chance he's scum, and scum don't try the kind of stuff Voided tried if AVox is a scum-partner.

Shoo fly, don't buddy me.

UNVOTE: Whiskers
VOTE: Voided

So...if scum don't do the stuff I did, doesn't that make me not scum? *scratches head* or is that supposed to be for Vox and not me?

btw, why exactly was what I was doing scummier-than-ever? I don't think you've explained that.

I'm here. I have my suspects, my votes are staying for now.

I don't like the AV wagon. At all.

Because...? (that's for Hiraki, too).

I really kind of want to wait for a vote count before I vote, but, I don't mind hammering at the same time. Or putting at L1 or L2.

Unvote, Unvote.

Vote: AurorusVox
Vote: Voided

And your reasoning is what?

its more how he said it. and while we might not have one. the odds of us having one is way higher. i mean have you ever played a game without one in it, or a way to compensate for not having one? i bet even if you have they tend to be very far spaced apart.

Meh, non-cop games can be rather common. Granted, they are more the exception, but they're not as rare as you're making them out to be.

I've already made my cases. Try reading.

I read one (Whiskers). It's crap.

Try harder, man. You can do better -_-.

[AurorusVox]

Christine, there's no way you think they're scum together.

Have you never heard of a Gambit? If they are both scum, then they make this big deal against each other. One of them flips scum, then the other rights to End Game being cleared for tracking down scum. Seen it happen far too many times to not be suspicious of it.

Because that thinking totally works when I'm trying to push for us both to be lynched at the same time

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD
1v1s are good for town
There are MORE TOWN THAN SCUM
If every town one for one traded to kill a scum
TOWN WOULD WIN

[Voidedmafia]

I think she's stuck with what happens after the lynches, Vox. I think.

[Whiskers]

Also, I made the point where you, AVox, a scum in danger of being lynched, would prefer a "1-for-1" double-lynch to a scum single-lynch.

[ThAdmiral]

malpascp has been prodded

[AurorusVox]

Also, I made the point where you, AVox, a scum in danger of being lynched, would prefer a "1-for-1" double-lynch to a scum single-lynch.

If I was scum in danger I would be doing my hardest to NOT get lynched, not offering my neck.

[Christine]

How is it day one and we already have so many WIFOMs?!

AVox, if you were scum, offering your neck would then vet you as townie, getting the lynch off of you, and a ride to end game. I hate WIFOMs.

[Christine]

How is it day one and we already have so many WIFOMs?!

AVox, if you were scum, offering your neck would then vet you as townie, getting the lynch off of you, and a ride to end game. I hate WIFOMs.

[Friend Mairsil]

hey cristine who do you believe scum is? is it just AV or do you have other nominees?

[Christine]

Happy Birthday FM!!!!!


To be honest, and I will admit this as a mafia fault of mine, when there is a large conflict going on between two people, I have a hard time really seeing past that. So, until this AVox-Voided bit is sorted through, all I can think is that at least one has to be scum, and it would not be surprising that they are both scum. I do have a few suspicions about Whiskers, but I think that is because of how aggressive he is being, and it just startles me for a Day 1 strategy.

[AurorusVox]

O_O"

Isn't the conflict between me and Whiskers?

[Voidedmafia]

Yeah...

Besides, either the debacle between vox and me has been settled, or one of us missed a post somewhere.

And I still really haven't seen why I'm a suspect. (that's to anyone who voted me after KJ did without reasoning; KJ has his own question of mine to answer)

[Friend Mairsil]

thank you mamas

[Christine]

I still think one of the two of you are scum, so my vote is staying.

[killerjester]

@Void, in #165 you talk about how it's possible AVox fell victim to bad timing, rather than truly voting me out of opportunism. You're providing rationale for an implied town perspective. In the same post you accuse AVox of being scummy and vote him.

You're scummier-than-ever for the contraction in agenda within a single post. I believe AVox to be town simply because he was the target of your attack - I think scum would be less wishy washy when bussing their own partner.

[Voidedmafia]

@Void, in #165 you talk about how it's possible AVox fell victim to bad timing, rather than truly voting me out of opportunism. You're providing rationale for an implied town perspective. In the same post you accuse AVox of being scummy and vote him.

You're scummier-than-ever for the contraction in agenda within a single post. I believe AVox to be town simply because he was the target of your attack - I think scum would be less wishy washy when bussing their own partner.

I supplied a possible reason, yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean that I believe what happened--and with Vox's further posts after that, I didn't.

Furthermore, it is entirely possible to turn your whole read around after reading two posts after each other, is it not? While I didn't really do a whole 180 (more like a 90), the same message is being applied here in regards to 86 and 98.

I have not been wishy-washy, or at least I've tried not to be. My switch to Nin was based on the fact that, while I was mainly against the double-lynch today, signs pointed toward it happening anyways, and I wished to then vote for both since I found one to be scum (Vox) and one that, between the two choices presented, was the scummiest of the two (Nin). Note that I have never wavered from believing Vox is scummy since I made that vote (which, btw, while made from past actions, solidified in the present, in case Vox tries that angle again).

[Nobody Special]

I have nothing to say at this point. My votes stay.

[AurorusVox]

I'm almost tempted to self vote to get this game beyond the pitiful grinding halt that has occurred.
Obv I won't do that but come on guys.
We've rehashed Vox versus whoever a whole bunch of times.

I want more input from basically half the game.
We have two votes - why does this mean people are using this as an excuse to lollurk and not really commit to reads? It should be the OPPOSITE.