It might mean something. Chamber has not yet said anything about his investigation result from this past night -- he's given us neither a name nor an indication of "innocent/guilty."BabyJesus wrote:And that is supposed to mean something?chamber wrote:I, however, Like the bj wagon a lot.
Glork wrote:It might mean something. Chamber has not yet said anything about his investigation result from this past night -- he's given us neither a name nor an indication of "innocent/guilty."BabyJesus wrote:And that is supposed to mean something?chamber wrote:I, however, Like the bj wagon a lot.
So it's distinctly possible that he got a guilty result on you, which would explain why he likes the wagon so much.
. But, since not very many people have hopped on the wagon, you probably don't have anything to worry about. they're masons. they "discovered" nothing at night. But your utter inability to think forself and attempt to just follow along the masons like a sheep is noted.Twomz wrote:BJ, the reason i'm still voting you is because 2 confirmed townies (who can talk at night) are acting like they've found something on you. I'm not sure why they haven't revealed what it is... i'm hopeful that they at least have some idea of what they're talking about..
I suggest letting others do the heavy lifting for a while, guy.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Instincts. I don't think he's acting like his usual self. And he's calling other people sheep. I don't have anything concrete on BJ, but that's pretty impossibly anyways. Follow me and prosper!
Maybe, but not when the people you are following are doing nothin bit choosing people at random. If they have a good reason to vote for me, I'm still waiting to hear it.Yosarian2 wrote:(shrug) When in doubt, there's nothing wrong with following a confirmed innocent. If you follow someone who's confirmed, they may be right or they may be wrong. If you're following someone who's not confirmed, they may be right, they may be wrong, or they may be scum..
that's the best you can come up with? Yikes. You're new at this, aren't you?Glork wrote:1) Your mistiming of the TU wagon. You voted him after we had confirmed his role and decided it would probably be better to look elsewhere.
2) Your voting of Shamrock because (this is paraphrased, I'm too lazy to go back adn quote directly) "people who argue WIFOM is scummy bother [you]." When Shamrock was in the group with Doc and Twomz who basically confirmed themselves as Peasant Townies.
3) Your voting of Tamuz today after he had given CES and me the impression that he knows about the nature of Masons and/or recruitability.
4) Your general non-willingness to contribute.
No individual reason is particularly solid. Added up, they make me feel pretty confident that you're a good lynch.
Unvote
Vote: BabyJesus
Mao Zedong wrote:The revolution, and the recognition of class and class struggle, are necessary for peasants and the Chinese people to overcome both domestic and foreign enemy elements. This is not a simple, clean, or quick struggle.
