In post 125, Shinki wrote:I needed some effort to understand the situation here, never been in a large flavoured game like this before.
Apparently I'm a Loyalist to House Argelev, and my win condition is met when all danger to House Argelev and it's loyalists are no longe existant. (paraphrase)
PEdit: No houses then?
I can't really take sides on the SK/David wagon, 'cause both of them (players) are confusing at some point. But I guess some pressure can't hurt.
So, for now:
Vote: David Xanatos
Sorry If I mess something up, headache is killing me right now.
First post expresses confusion over the SK/DX fight, places a pressure vote on DX and FoS on SK, this to me says that she thinks that the two are of the same alignment, possibly scum bussing the hell out of each other.
In post 130, Shinki wrote:#gandalf
And how do we know that you won't betray us? lol
That's more troublesome than anything I read from David or SK. :T
PEdit: It's more dangerous than a survivor, definitely, as survivors can't change their alignment to harm another factions.
Expresses concern about Gandalf and his side changing roleclaim, also expresses that she sees that this is more harmful to town than what's going on with the SK/DX fight
In post 133, Shinki wrote:Indeed, that's not nice at all.
Unvote:
Vote: gandalf5166
Just because this situation is much less confusing than David/SK issue.
places a vote down, the rest of it is fluff, there's nothing noncommittal about this.
In post 142, Shinki wrote:#MacDougall
Not really, I was just eating cake in the meantime and when I came back he already did it.
inb4 the cake is a lie.
All the discussion concerning SK and David still a mess in my head, so I'd prefer to vote for something I find myself worth of voting, and not something that I don't quite understand.
And "Indeed, that's not nice at all" was an answer to your post, not vezokpiraka's.
This one:
In post 131, MacDougall wrote:Oh, I believe he almost certainly will betray us. Those who, historically, have faced the choice he has before him, regularly choose the path of darkness.
Wants to vote for something that she can see is scummy, (protown movement) how eactly is this noncommital? You seem to be totally skewing what Shinki is saying.
In post 180, Shinki wrote: In post 174, AGar wrote:VOTE: David Xanatos
Seven pages in and it seems like a lot has gone on.. but it really hasn't.
- SK fakes a daykill and tries to bait people into claiming alignments.
Anyone who buys the daykill is an idiot.
Anyone with half a brain should've read the OP and the sample VT role PMs and would've known "Hey, don't claim shit."
- DX tries to latch on to these as "scummy" plays and comes up with a million and one bullshit reasons as to why we should lynch SK, none of which are valid.
- Gandalf claims survivor bastard
People try and push to lynch him based on the fact that his alignment *might* change. They are stupid.
Townie brownies go to SK, Otolia, Gand, and NC for what they've put in.
Scum cum goes to DX so far. Vezok and shinki can be added to the list of borderline scumbags.
Oh, now I understand their situation, thanks.
And it's not like two votes are going to "lynch" anyone...
Anyways, I'll stick with gandalf reasoning for the time being.
Unvote:
Unvote makes sense
In post 376, Shinki wrote: In post 372, Nero Cain wrote: In post 319, Shinki wrote: In post 317, Nero Cain wrote:.........................................................................................................................................................................................
wasted shot was wasted.
If you has more kill DX or Shinki
Mind if I ask you why would you like to kill me?
ISO 0 looks like fence sitting and then hoping on one or the other so you wouldn't look as scummy.
Your Gandalf vote and the
reason
for the Gandalf vote in ISO 2 sounds pretty opportunistic to me. In ISO 3 you state "All the discussion concerning SK and David still a mess in my head, so I'd prefer to vote for something I find myself worth of voting, and not something that I don't quite understand."
Yet you still voted for something you didn't deem worthy of a vote?
but you know what I find funny? When I fosed you in 148 you said
NOTHING
but when we found out that SK is an actual day vig and I said I wanted a shot on you then you were concerned.
Not really
concerned
, I was just curious.
About your other vote, you voted me for reasons I already explained to MacDougall a few posts before, and he didn't feel like voting me as you did. So I thought it would be useless to argue something more with you.
Points out that you aren't committal to voting for your scum read, wonders why nero cain views the same reasoning as enough to vote for her
In post 490, Shinki wrote:Well, imo SK vs. David is a Town-Town discussion, getting us nowhere in the end...
What's the case on Empking again? >:
PEdit: Ya, port claim is definitely not a scum claim. As the mod said, there are 'large groups' along with the houses too.
Wants to move the focus off of what she views as a town v town thing now, while unneccessary she can't be scum with Empking because she is drawing attention away from town v town to scum, which in my mind is the worst scum play in the book.
In post 493, Shinki wrote:Btw, there is anyone that came from the East here?
I just realized something.
Flavour speculation, not necessarily a bad thing considering most of day one was flavour speculation
In post 664, Shinki wrote:Call me dumb, but I think he's not lying .-. something like 65/35 true.. I can't really understand your logic, SK.
disregard the numbers, asks for reclarification of the point. This is also after Empking's claim, since the last post that she expressed an interest in Empking it has been two hours.
In post 669, Shinki wrote: In post 668, SleepyKrew wrote:Emp said he didn't believe my claim because he didn't realize a player can be a group. He claims to not have said this because Otoloia already said it. This is a LIE. Emp posted TWICE between my claim and Oto's post. Those two posts were a vote, and then calling my claim fake (with no reasoning). Now he is just
flail
splashing around like the Magikarp he is.
I hope I didn't forget too much of it >.<
'kay, I understand it now.. but if he really flips townie cop? That would be incredibad for us, no?
And many people voted for Empking but still didn't said nothing about his claim, what do you guys think about that?
In post 671, Shinki wrote:It's been some hours already... anyways,
Vote: Empking
Well, he's at L-1 now, just a reminder
Btw, Sleepy, who would you shot tomorrow?
inb4 you
no, srsly.
Sleepy describes the case on Empking and his disbelief at empkings claim, understandable and good, she puts Emp back to L-1
In post 683, Shinki wrote:SleepyKrew wrote:Shinki, still don't see why I'm not allowed to shoot you.
I didn't say you aren't allowed, I wanted to know who'd you shoot besides me, that's all.
Nero Cain wrote:unvote
In post 664, Shinki wrote:Call me dumb,
but I think he's not lying .-. something like 65/35 true
.. I can't really understand your logic, SK.
THIS AFTER YOU SAID HE'S MOST LIKELY TOWN?!?
'k, I see that there are blind ones here too, read 668. [2]
Asks, someone to go do legwork for her thought process, nullish thing
In post 690, Shinki wrote:
After reading the case SK showed me and isolating Emp posts, he's acting more scummier than I thought, I'd bet 72/28 fake.
inb4 opportunist blablabla
Yeah, right.
Explains why she voted Emp, seems logical again disregard the numbers, I'm 99/20/50 sure that they're only meant as a guide to give some form of quantification of her stance.