Imperial Intrigue (Endgame, OUT OF NOWHERE)

Otolia · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:36 am

In post 458, Empking wrote:The Factional is IGMEOY but I understand the basically now.

Unvote, Vote: Ot

That was the most suspicious you ever done. Unless you are mixing this game with another one we are both in, you have absolutely no backing in your vote. And RVS is long gone now. So you better explained yourself on that.

Empking · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:37 am

In post 475, Otolia wrote:
In post 458, Empking wrote:The Factional is IGMEOY but I understand the basically now.

Unvote, Vote: Ot

That was the most suspicious you ever done. Unless you are mixing this game with another one we are both in, you have absolutely no backing in your vote. And RVS is long gone now. So you better explained yourself on that.

I've said it before. I think the port claim was a scum claim.

Empking · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:40 am

I've just checked the flavour for D1: Can someone explain to me why we're not lynching the player who the flavour declares as "traitors"?

kdowns · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:41 am

Because of this.. "

In post 3, Wraith wrote:

Please remember that flavor has NO BEARING on any players' role or alignment. Names used were chosen at random.

Magua · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:42 am

I'm really curious who you think that is.

EtherealCookie · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:43 am

In post 474, Empking wrote:1. Hi EC
2. SK tried to solicit opinions for town cred so...
3. EC: That question is still wanting an answer from you. (And I meant play rather than plan.)

Hi?
I'm not on 24/7.
And that was already addressed.
The idea of a scum vig revealing himself on a poorly played town is ridiculous. Shooting an experienced player that appears somewhat scummy is a better move.

Otolia · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:44 am

That was the argument of AGar but he dropped it without much explanation. You better have one. I am the leader of the port city and I am loyal to the Argelev beyond doubt. That's why I can assure that the heir I know about (David Xanatos) is aligned with me. You are ready to vote for DX because his flavor quotes are bad but you used that argument against me. Your logic is flawed.

DX gave us his flavor to back up his claims, you are asked to back up your accusations right now.

Otolia · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:45 am

EBDP : The above message is adressed to Empking of course.

Empking's Alt · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:45 am

In post 478, kdowns wrote:Because of this.. "
In post 3, Wraith wrote:

Please remember that flavor has NO BEARING on any players' role or alignment. Names used were chosen at random.

That is about the players in the flavour being random.

Magua: The army marching from the West. Monk.

EC: Hi was to Magua. It was sarcasm. Are you saying you can't answer my question?

PEdit: I'll look for the quote that game me my read on you.

EtherealCookie · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:47 am

Oh.
You wanted actual games. In that case, I can't indulge you.
I'm going off this wonderful thing called common sense here, not previous experience. There is no plus to drawing attention to oneself with a vigilante kill on someone who played poorly. He could've gotten much more town credit from just asking for a vote on who to kill if that was his intention.

Empking's Alt · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:48 am

Oh yeah. Your flavour matches DX suggesting you're not a Loyalist. You have claimed not be of House Arglelov (or whatever) making you non-town.

PEdIt: He asked for a vote. People just thought he was a liar.

EtherealCookie · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:49 am

He asked for a vote between two people and shot because nobody said anything. Not exactly the same thing.

Empking · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:49 am

In post 483, Empking's Alt wrote:
In post 478, kdowns wrote:Because of this.. "
In post 3, Wraith wrote:

Please remember that flavor has NO BEARING on any players' role or alignment. Names used were chosen at random.

That is about the players in the flavour being random.

Magua: The army marching from the West. Monk.

EC: Hi was to Magua. It was sarcasm. Are you saying you can't answer my question?

PEdit: I'll look for the quote that game me my read on you.

In post 485, Empking's Alt wrote:Oh yeah. Your flavour matches DX suggesting you're not a Loyalist. You have claimed not be of House Arglelov (or whatever) making you non-town.

PEdIt: He asked for a vote. People just thought he was a liar.

Empking · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:50 am

EC: Yes the same thing.

Otolia · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:53 am

In post 485, Empking's Alt wrote:Oh yeah. Your flavour matches DX suggesting you're not a Loyalist. You have claimed not be of House Arglelov (or whatever) making you non-town.

Stop BSing me. You are making yourself look dumb right now. Name of House =/= alignment except for the heirs of House Argelev. You are not reading the thread carefully enough to make assumptions based on your supposed intelligence.

Can you answer that question :

Why is the port claim a scum-tell ?

If you can't, then you voted for me in order to blend in and thus you are scum.

Shinki · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:56 am

Well, imo SK vs. David is a Town-Town discussion, getting us nowhere in the end...

What's the case on Empking again? >:

PEdit: Ya, port claim is definitely not a scum claim. As the mod said, there are 'large groups' along with the houses too.

Empking · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:00 am

In post 489, Otolia wrote:If you can't, then you voted for me in order to blend in and thus you are scum.

That's lolworthy. "You went out on a limb to vote a player no one else was voting to blend in."

You claimed to not be a loyalist.
You claimed not to be of the house of (whatever)
That is a scum claim.

Empking · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:01 am

Its not the port claim that's scummy. I just have a horrid problem with names and remembered the port part rather than the Delmar part.

Shinki · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:06 am

Btw, there is anyone that came from the East here?
I just realized something.

Wraith · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:06 am

Okay this is starting to get ridiculous.

You guys are not going to find out who is what alignment from the flavor. I've either left it totally ambiguous or am outright lying about certain elements to keep roles secret. Do not take this as me being a bastard mod and lying to you about your own roles, I'm just saying that this flavor speculation is getting out of hand and will not solve anything.

If the speculation continues on the scale it's on now then I will move from "ambiguous" to "deliberately deceptive" in my mod flavor, and/or ban paraphrasing of role PM flavor altogether.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:30 am

So Otolia, David is conftown to you because of flavor? Well, sucks for David.
Empking wagon choo choo.

David Xanatos · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:47 am

I'm just curious, have any other games got so in depth about flavour that the mod has taken/threatened action based on it? xD

SleepyKrew · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:48 am

David. RVS stance. Go.

David Xanatos · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:09 am

I don't understand what you mean by the question, frankly.

Are you asking me what my stance on RVS is in general, as in, do I favour RVS over RQS, or over something else?

*note: I've got food poisoning right now. Feeling quite bad, if I don't respond promptly, I'm likely calling for Huey.*

SleepyKrew · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:12 am

Overall general stance on RVS. Hell, stance on RQS as well.
I've asked this at least 3 times already.