Imperial Intrigue (Endgame, OUT OF NOWHERE)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:49 am

Wow. Modvouch.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:51 am

Prods due on tcl, Bogre, JDGA, right?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:52 am

Oh, prods are 72 hours.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:53 am

lol Rule 15 says this is a Mini Normal

Otolia · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:02 am

In post 521, Empking wrote:"Who claimed the port
house
?"

Its the port
city
if you want to play it your way. I specifically said House.

Then what post made you write that, and how is this post (mentioning the '

port house

') made you vote for me ?

gandalf5166 · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:08 am

In post 459, whispersilk wrote:
In post 456, gandalf5166 wrote:
In post 454, whispersilk wrote:While I'm typing out my statement, I would like to say now that I believe the flavour of the role pm's has created massive confusion among the town, and scum are taking full advantage of that. Therefore:

@mod:
I request in game clarification that
all members of House Argelev
, along with all loyalists to House Argelev (whether members of another house, or not), are indeed THE TOWN in this game. Thank you.

The answer is going to be no. I already told you, there are traitors within House Argelev.

Within?
As in member(s) of the family itself, or its loyalists?

And you used plural, does this mean there is more than on traitor?

I'd like to know how you know this information.

It's in my role PM. My role's flavor is essentially that it's my job to root out the traitors. And within the house itself. Obviously, those people would not be ALIGNED with House Argelev. I don't have time to read pages 20-22 now.

Empking · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:08 am

In post 529, Otolia wrote:
In post 521, Empking wrote:"Who claimed the port
house
?"

Its the port
city
if you want to play it your way. I specifically said House.

Then what post made you write that, and how is this post (mentioning the '
port house
') made you vote for me ?

The post...where you claimed?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:09 am

gandy, stop using flavor.

Empking · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:11 am

Claim your win condition as best you can. This is making sense to me.

MacDougall · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:24 am

Lol Gandalf must have the longest role PM ever devised.

Anyway my win condition is I win when all threats to House Argelev and it's loyalists are defeated.

Empking · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:25 am

In post 533, Empking wrote:Claim your win condition as best you can. This is making sense to me.

Oh I'm an idiot.

Fixed.

In post 533, Empking wrote:Gandalf:Claim your win condition as best you can. This is not making sense to me.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:27 am

In post 534, MacDougall wrote:Lol Gandalf must have the longest role PM ever devised.

Anyway my win condition is I win when all threats to House Argelev and it's loyalists are defeated.

I believe Magua has been asking you a question.

MacDougall · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:40 am

Really? Where?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:42 am

Why are you voting NL (and not Emp)?

MacDougall · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:43 am

In post 465, Magua wrote:
In post 460, SleepyKrew wrote:Magua, when you say I won't be around, do you mean lynched or killed?

Yes.

These votes for monk are just incredibad. Vezok has a certain tendency to be incredibad. Empking does not.

UNVOTE: tclawren
VOTE: Empking

MacDougall, why in God's name are you voting no lynch?

Well at that stage I was too confused to vote for anyone. I'll vote for someone eventually. I just wanted my vote on no lynch in case the day ended before I came back because I didn't want to be on anyone.

MacDougall · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:47 am

In post 538, SleepyKrew wrote:Why are you voting NL (and not Emp)?

At this stage I don't have much reason to think that Empking is scum. He's because intentionally obtuse imo. Trying to rub the scum the wrong way. I like it when town play like he is.

MacDougall · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:50 am

Edit: Typo. Meant to say "He's being" not "He's because".

SleepyKrew · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:51 am

What the fuck u scum bro?

MacDougall · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:54 am

SleepyKrew wrote:What the fuck u scum bro?

No. What kind of a question is this?

Otolia · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:58 am

In post 531, Empking wrote:
In post 529, Otolia wrote:
In post 521, Empking wrote:"Who claimed the port
house
?"

Its the port
city
if you want to play it your way. I specifically said House.

Then what post made you write that, and how is this post (mentioning the '
port house
') made you vote for me ?

The post...where you claimed?

Stop playing dumb, Empking. You are just writing BS hoping I will get mad and drop the case. This will not happen.

I claimed : House Delmar, leader of the port city of Mos Forvar. Exactly here

What in this claim is scummy ?

Reminder :

In post 177, Empking wrote:Who claimed the port house? They're prob scum too.

If you don't find this claim scummy, then why did you vote for me

twice

without

any

kind of reasoning behind.

@Everyone

: Empking's wagon needs more vote.

Otolia · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:01 pm

@MacDougall

: stop being a chicken and vote for someone. What kind of player vote No Lynch the first of a Large Theme ... Hint : Vote for Empking.

Empking · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:02 pm

Because House Delmar is not Algerov or similar to my role.

MacDougall · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:02 pm

I'm not voting for someone that I think is town.

David Xanatos · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:08 pm

What's your opinion of Vezok then?

MacDougall · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:13 pm

I'm suspicious of Shinki. She just seems to be hopping from bandwagon to bandwagon to me but hasn't shown commitment to any of them. Seems hell bent on flying under the radar. Just read her ISO. She seems much more likely scum than Empking.

As for Vezok. If what Gandalf says is true, and we have no reason to doubt it, then he'd make a good bet for scum too. There is enough suspicion in him for simply being a member of House Argelev and voting for you tbh. If you are both House Argelev, and he has voted for you, then one of you is scum. I'd be happy to vote for him too.