......................................................
...
. . .
...
*tilts head to side*
*
*
In post 382, ace5993 wrote:Vi translation (to the best of my ability, correct me if I misinterpret anything) wrote:
220 - Votes ace because he thinks ace is slandering the CrabCanon wagon in a bad way. Also he believes CrabCanon vs. sotty is looking like an unproductive slap-fight.
253 - Concerned that CrabCanon said ace's name when he meant 4nxi3ty's name, I'm guessing the reasoning is that CrabCanon allegedly had ace's name in his head because Vi think's they're scum-buddies. More concern about ace's defense of CrabCanon.
376 - Says that the main reason he's voting aceisdue to CrabCanon - ace relationship.
I really don't like Shift's weak jump to a policy lynch when sotty is at L-2, why do you think springlullaby is a better choice than sotty right now? Here's a hint, we aren't policy lynching today (although springlullaby isn't a bad choice for other reasons). Put up a genuine case on someone or get back on sotty.
*quizzical look*In post 401, Amrun wrote:This is a town post.In post 382, ace5993 wrote:I really don't like Shift's weak jump to a policy lynch when sotty is at L-2, why do you think springlullaby is a better choice than sotty right now? Here's a hint, we aren't policy lynching today (although springlullaby isn't a bad choice for other reasons). Put up a genuine case on someone or get back on sotty.Vi translation (to the best of my ability, correct me if I misinterpret anything) wrote:
220 - Votes ace because he thinks ace is slandering the CrabCanon wagon in a bad way. Also he believes CrabCanon vs. sotty is looking like an unproductive slap-fight.
253 - Concerned that CrabCanon said ace's name when he meant 4nxi3ty's name, I'm guessing the reasoning is that CrabCanon allegedly had ace's name in his head because Vi think's they're scum-buddies. More concern about ace's defense of CrabCanon.
376 - Says that the main reason he's voting aceisdue to CrabCanon - ace relationship.
*holds left hand up with fingers together*Amrun 402 wrote:Vi, why do VIs sheep your post restrictions? lol
In post 382, ace5993 wrote:
I really don't like Shift's weak jump to a policy lynch when sotty is at L-2, why do you think springlullaby is a better choice than sotty right now? Here's a hint, we aren't policy lynching today (although springlullaby isn't a bad choice for other reasons). Put up a genuine case on someone or get back on sotty.
In post 324, saulres wrote:Confirm vote: 4nxi3ty
I highly suggest everyone else policy lynch him until he stops posting like that.
Unless Vi converted him?
In post 405, ace5993 wrote:You know what I'm willing to see where this wagon goes,Unvote, Vote: springlullaby. The timing of Shift's vote still leaves a bad taste in my mouth but I don't think it has any bearing on springlullaby's alignment and this game has been in a stall.
In no way does this mean we should be forgetting about sotty.
In post 382, ace5993 wrote:
I really don't like Shift's weak jump to a policy lynch when sotty is at L-2, why do you think springlullaby is a better choice than sotty right now?Here's a hint, we aren't policy lynching today (although springlullaby isn't a bad choice for other reasons).Put up a genuine case on someone or get back on sotty.
In post 405, ace5993 wrote:You know what I'm willing to see where this wagon goes,The timing of Shift's vote still leaves a bad taste in my mouth but I don't think it has any bearing on springlullaby's alignment and this game has been in a stall.Unvote, Vote: springlullaby.
In no way does this mean we should be forgetting about sotty.
In post 391, ace5993 wrote:springlullaby ISO:
#3 - No participation in RVS/fluff
#20, #26 - Townhunting
#27 - Fluff
#28 - Townhunting
#54 - Fluff
#84 - Still lacking of any form of scumhunting
#159 - He says sotty's aggressiveness is "good for the town", and fence-sits on CrabCanon
In post 408, Crab Canon wrote:In post 382, ace5993 wrote:
I really don't like Shift's weak jump to a policy lynch when sotty is at L-2, why do you think springlullaby is a better choice than sotty right now?Here's a hint, we aren't policy lynching today (although springlullaby isn't a bad choice for other reasons).Put up a genuine case on someone or get back on sotty.
Yeah this is probably the scummiest thing I have seen all day.In post 405, ace5993 wrote:You know what I'm willing to see where this wagon goes,The timing of Shift's vote still leaves a bad taste in my mouth but I don't think it has any bearing on springlullaby's alignment and this game has been in a stall.Unvote, Vote: springlullaby.
In no way does this mean we should be forgetting about sotty.
Unvote, vote: ace
*stares sternly at saulres*saulres wrote:LOL. OMGUS much?In post 406, 4nxi3ty wrote:unvote, vote: saulres
In post 416, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:So I was catchting up on reading and saw Spring had about 3 votes added to him?
I must have missed it, can someone tell where the case agaisnt him is?
*holds both hands with palms up*Crab Canon 415 wrote:Spring lullabye is not active lurking. She is actively being a waste of space and is very blatant about it.
*shakes head*In post 415, Crab Canon wrote:Really, vi? You don't think that vote was a very opportunistic vote switch?
*waves hands slowly and dramatically*Guy_Named_Riggs 416 wrote:So I was catchting up on reading and saw Spring had about 3 votes added to him?
I must have missed it, can someone tell where the case agaisnt him is?
*purses lips to side*Fishythefish 419 wrote:Wow. Springlullaby just gained a 4 vote wagon in just over a page, for lurking. She has been lurking all game. This feels very much like a distraction from either ace or sotty.
In post 416, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:So I was catchting up on reading and saw Spring had about 3 votes added to him?
I must have missed it, can someone tell where the case agaisnt him is?
In post 409, ace5993 wrote:Are we forgetting that I PUT UP THE CASE ON SPRINGLULLABY? This isn't a random switch to a policy lynch, I think springlullaby is scum. My concern is that Shift did NOT put up a case.
*reads own posts*In post 421, springlullaby wrote:@Vi, why do you choose to vote me instead of Guy_Named_Riggs?
I'm asking you specifically because you seem to think GNR is badfor the same reasons as mebut choose to vote me instead whereas you know lurking is my habitual MO.
*reads own post*springlullaby 421 wrote:Are you seriously suggesting that I and GNR are scumbuddies(that's what I got from the horns things)? On what basis?
*eyebrow twitch*springlullaby 421 wrote:My opinion is that my current vote is a good one. Please see lastreversed chainsaw defensein:Deciphering this for you: GNR is defending un-defendable behavior (namely lurking) becauseIn post 416, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:So I was catchting up on reading and saw Spring had about 3 votes added to him?
I must have missed it, can someone tell where the case agaisnt him is?
1) he is a lurker himself so what he is saying is in reality 'I'm a lurker and I shouldn't be lynched'
2) he is pre-emptively trying to associate town points for himself when/if I flip town because of our likeness of behavior.